[aur-general] TU Resignation

[Karol Blazewicz]

On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Thomas S Hatch <thatch45 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Ray Rashif <schiv at archlinux.org> wrote:
>
>> On 21 November 2011 00:10, Jelle van der Waa <jelle at vdwaa.nl> wrote:
>> > On 19/11/11 19:44, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I have a lot of regret doing this, and I have been working hard to find
>> >> the
>> >> time to keep up with my TU duties, but every day I have less and less
>> time
>> >> because work is continually ramping up, and what free time I have left
>> >> ends
>> >> up going to Salt (http://saltstack.org).
>> >>
>> >> So, very sadly, I need to resign from my position as an Arch Linux TU. I
>> >> hope I can be of assistance to Arch in the future and I am still
>> planning
>> >> on maintaining the Varch project: https://github.com/thatch45/varch
>> >>
>> >> So with deep regret, I must resign my brief stint as a TU, it was fun,
>> and
>> >> I greatly appreciate the opportunity, but it is very unfair of me to not
>> >> be
>> >> maintaining my packages.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >>
>> >> -Thomas S Hatch
>> >
>> > Sad to see you leave, good luck with Salt!
>> >
>> > --
>> > Jelle van der Waa
>> >
>>
>> One awesome person less :(
>>
>> Good luck with everything else!
>>
>> --
>> GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
>>
>
> Thanks everyone, maybe sometime in the future things will clear up enough
> for me to come back, but not at the rate things are going now. Life has
> changed so much since I joined Arch!
>
> Keep making the worlds best Linux Distro better!
>
> -Thomas S Hatch
>

Can somebody enlighten me what happened with this ML discussion?
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/thread.html
shows a bit of a mess but it doesn't explain why
[aur-general] TU Resignation   Thomas S Hatch
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/016543.html
looks identical to the previous message:
[aur-general] Developer / TU key signing, first master key available
Thomas Bächler http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/016540.html
What's even more baffling is that the next 2 messages:
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/016544.html
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/016546.html
look identical too (the sender and date looks OK).

I'm not well-versed in the ML-foo so please rename this thread / start
a new one if you think it's more appropriate.