[aur-general] Request to add a rule

[Christopher luna]

Thank you very much for your help :)
I really think AUR should not be like a torrent site.
Im not a moralist, and I have used abandonware myself. XD

But I really think aur is not the place for that, and of course, is not the place for "office ultrawarez full editon 2011" (lol) but it can be the place for a demo edition.

thank you Ray rashif for helping to clarify this, and thank you to everyone

:D


--- El vie 28-oct-11, Ray Rashif <schiv at archlinux.org> escribió:

> De: Ray Rashif <schiv at archlinux.org>
> Asunto: Re: [aur-general] Request to add a rule
> A: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" <aur-general at archlinux.org>
> Fecha: viernes, 28 de octubre de 2011, 17:29
> On 29 October 2011 06:14, Ray Rashif
> <schiv at archlinux.org>
> wrote:
> > * Uploading a "Microsoft Office 2011 Demo" PKGBUID
> that retrieves an
> > official *non-redistributable* archive containing
> clean executables is
> > WRONG.
> 
> Ammendment to this part:
> 
> * Uploading a "Microsoft Office 2011 Demo" PKGBUILD that
> retrieves
> *from a third-party site* an official *non-redistributable*
> archive
> containing clean executables is WRONG.
> 
> * Uploading a "Microsoft Office 2011 Demo" PKGBUILD that
> retrieves
> *from the official site* an official *non-redistributable*
> archive
> containing clean executables is RIGHT, *unless linking
> from
> third-party sites is explicitly forbidden*.
> 
> 
> --
> GPG/PGP ID: 8AADBB10
>