[aur-general] aurdupes 0.6 released

gadget3000 gadget3000 at msn.com
Tue Sep 6 05:21:17 EDT 2011

2011/8/30 Lukáš Jirkovský <l.jirkovsky at gmail.com>

> On 30 August 2011 12:09, gadget3000 <gadget3000 at msn.com> wrote:
> > ipset-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49724) was created
> to
> > update ipset (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16553). The
> > maintainer is happy for it to be removed (see comments).
> Deleted, thanks.
> Hi everyone,

It's been a week since I tried to get in contact with some of these
maintainers and some packages have been deleted since, so here is the final
aurdupes -A list.

*Packages created to update others:*
stardict-ncce-ce-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40850) I
think was created to fix the source links of stardict-ncce-ce (
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19437) after the project was
removed from sourceforge. It currently has no maintainer or votes and
stardict-ncce-ce is also orphaned.

stardict-ncce-ec-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40851) did
the same thing for stardict-ncce-ec (
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19438). It also is orphaned and
has no votes and stardict-ncce-ec is also orphaned.

*Packages created for other reasons:*
idjc-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35076) is poorly
named and should be called idjc-git
spideroak-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47096) is poorly
named and should be called spideroak-beta. It is actively maintained.
xf86-video-intel-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22968) is
poorly named and should probably be called xf86-video-intel-alpha. I'm not
sure what is the norm around alpha packages so please let me know what
happens with this one.
yaffs2utils-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46674) is
poorly named and should be called yaffs2utils-snapshot but it's maintained
by someone with an @archlinux email address so I think I'm mistaken on this
one. Let me know what you think.
josm-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13569) is poorly
named and should be called something like josm-devel
metslib-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43739). I'm not
sure why this was created because the maintainer of metslib-newest and
metslib is the same. Metslib-newest is more up to date than metslib though.


More information about the aur-general mailing list