[aur-general] Naming convention for Python 2 and 3 apps
cyberdupo56 at gmail.com
Mon Dec 10 19:40:12 EST 2012
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:52:12AM +0100, Karol Woźniak wrote:
> It seems that none cares after all, huh?
> But I still do want to do it as right as it can possibly be, mostly because
> I now need flake8 for both python 2 and 3.
> So if nobody complains, I'll go with my initial thought (see my previous
> post here) sometime near the end of the week.
I think flake8, python2-flake8 for the package names and flake8, flake82
for the executables is fine. flake82 looks a little unwieldy, but I
don't think there's anything fundamentally wrong with that name. Maybe
include a note in the .install or somewhere so that users know that it
has been renamed.
Someone else has picked up flake8-python3 since I orphaned it, so you
may need to get him/her to drop it again.
More information about the aur-general