From nobody at archlinux.org  Sun Jan  1 04:07:04 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2012 09:07:04 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120101090704.25481.51641@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 2 fully signed off packages
* 5 packages missing signoffs
* 5 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (3 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64)
    1/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) ==

* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (x86_64)
    1/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (2 total) ==

* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any)
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64)


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13
* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686), since 2011-11-30
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64), since 2011-11-30


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. tomegun - 6 signoffs
2. stephane - 4 signoffs
3. bpiotrowski - 2 signoffs


From eldermarco at gmail.com  Sun Jan  1 06:40:11 2012
From: eldermarco at gmail.com (Elder Marco)
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 09:40:11 -0200
Subject: [aur-general] Removal Request: cwpsu
Message-ID: <CAJa2Z+4RJtQJF9MY2bndb0OEbRerbriaY-JEKeJA6QHyUL1yNg@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

I've renamed cwpsu[1] to seismicunix[2]. Please if possible, remove the
package cwpsu.

Regards,

[1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52161
[2] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55467

-- 
Elder Marco

GNU/Linux User: #471180

"Contra o positivismo, que p?ra perante os fen?menos e diz: 'H? apenas
fatos', eu digo: 'Ao contr?rio, fatos ? o que n?o h?; h? apenas
interpreta??es'. "(Nietzsche)

From atsutane at freethoughts.de  Sun Jan  1 06:44:27 2012
From: atsutane at freethoughts.de (Thorsten =?ISO-8859-1?B?VPZwcGVy?=)
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 12:44:27 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Removal Request: cwpsu
In-Reply-To: <CAJa2Z+4RJtQJF9MY2bndb0OEbRerbriaY-JEKeJA6QHyUL1yNg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJa2Z+4RJtQJF9MY2bndb0OEbRerbriaY-JEKeJA6QHyUL1yNg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120101124427.0aceac41@hell>

On Sun, 1 Jan 2012 09:40:11 -0200
Elder Marco <eldermarco at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I've renamed cwpsu[1] to seismicunix[2]. Please if possible, remove
> the package cwpsu.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> [1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52161
> [2] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55467
> 

Done.

-- 
Jabber: atsutane at freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/
Key: 295AFBF4     FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 222 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120101/2e07a106/attachment.asc>

From stefan-husmann at t-online.de  Sun Jan  1 09:12:29 2012
From: stefan-husmann at t-online.de (Stefan Husmann)
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2012 15:12:29 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [deletion request] cairo-dock-plug-ins-bzrc
Message-ID: <4F0069CD.8080100@t-online.de>

Hello,

sorry, I made a typo when uploading. cairo-dock-plug-ins-bzrc (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55470)
should have been just an update for cairo-dock-plug-ins-bzr (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49658).

Please delete the first one.

Regards Stefan

From l.jirkovsky at gmail.com  Sun Jan  1 10:07:06 2012
From: l.jirkovsky at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?THVrw6HFoSBKaXJrb3Zza8O9?=)
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 16:07:06 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [deletion request] cairo-dock-plug-ins-bzrc
In-Reply-To: <4F0069CD.8080100@t-online.de>
References: <4F0069CD.8080100@t-online.de>
Message-ID: <CAFa9FQsut0pPU1OVBotC6T7MQ=HmOnYUcRHbzS5paCY_SdGrXg@mail.gmail.com>

On 1 January 2012 15:12, Stefan Husmann <stefan-husmann at t-online.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> sorry, I made a typo when uploading. cairo-dock-plug-ins-bzrc
> (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55470)
> should have been just an update for cairo-dock-plug-ins-bzr
> (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49658).
>
> Please delete the first one.
>
> Regards Stefan

Done

From karnathtorjian at gmail.com  Sun Jan  1 10:15:27 2012
From: karnathtorjian at gmail.com (karnath)
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 19:15:27 +0400
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: abiword+plugins-light
Message-ID: <20120101151527.GA18520@main>

Good day.

Package [1] is outdated, has no votes, orphaned, as is its pkgbuild, and
it's purpose are to be disputed (there are already light and minimal
versions on aur)

[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30077

-- 
E-Mail  : karnathtorjian at gmail.com

From barthalion at gmail.com  Sun Jan  1 10:41:02 2012
From: barthalion at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QmFydMWCb21pZWogUGlvdHJvd3NraQ==?=)
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2012 16:41:02 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: abiword+plugins-light
In-Reply-To: <20120101151527.GA18520@main>
References: <20120101151527.GA18520@main>
Message-ID: <4F007E8E.1030403@gmail.com>

Done.

-- 
Bart?omiej Piotrowski
Arch Linux Trusted User
http://archlinux.org/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120101/f2235b9e/attachment.asc>

From diogobaeder at yahoo.com.br  Sun Jan  1 22:43:17 2012
From: diogobaeder at yahoo.com.br (Diogo Baeder)
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 19:43:17 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [aur-general] wingide maintainer
Message-ID: <1325475797.74670.YahooMailNeo@web160301.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>

Hello,

The wingide package is out-of-date, and I tried to contact the maintainer, but with no reply. I'd like to maintain it myself, then, if there's no other suggestion that I can use to update the package.

This is the URL for the package at the AUR repos:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15672


Thanks!
?
Diogo Baeder
http://www.diogobaeder.com.br

From gostrc at gmail.com  Mon Jan  2 00:44:58 2012
From: gostrc at gmail.com (Thomas Dziedzic)
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 23:44:58 -0600
Subject: [aur-general] wingide maintainer
In-Reply-To: <1325475797.74670.YahooMailNeo@web160301.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
References: <1325475797.74670.YahooMailNeo@web160301.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <CANFDciGSm5NO2QWN3MPVFoqRvie2=UuTdYc6AfC5btDaOp5mxA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Diogo Baeder <diogobaeder at yahoo.com.br> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The wingide package is out-of-date, and I tried to contact the maintainer, but with no reply. I'd like to maintain it myself, then, if there's no other suggestion that I can use to update the package.
>
> This is the URL for the package at the AUR repos:
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15672
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Diogo Baeder
> http://www.diogobaeder.com.br

disowned

From nobody at archlinux.org  Mon Jan  2 04:07:04 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 09:07:04 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120102090704.29042.14448@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 2 fully signed off packages
* 5 packages missing signoffs
* 5 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (3 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64)
    1/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) ==

* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (x86_64)
    1/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (2 total) ==

* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any)
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64)


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13
* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686), since 2011-11-30
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64), since 2011-11-30


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. bluewind - 3 signoffs
2. allan - 2 signoffs


From admin at polslinux.it  Mon Jan  2 08:45:14 2012
From: admin at polslinux.it (admin at polslinux.it)
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 14:45:14 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] about non-updated packages
Message-ID: <20120102144514.100632pruoebztuy@webmail.polslinux.it>

Hello :)
I would like to maintain these packages that haven't been updated for  
long time:

Lives (03/12/2011)
Xampp (25/09/2011)
Firefox-pgo (14/08/2011)
Dropbox-experimental (26/12/2011)

which respective links are:

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1642
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14141
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22296
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29432

Let me know if this is possible,
thanks in advance,

Polslinux

From ibiru at archlinux.org  Mon Jan  2 09:00:16 2012
From: ibiru at archlinux.org (Ionut Biru)
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:00:16 +0200
Subject: [aur-general] about non-updated packages
In-Reply-To: <20120102144514.100632pruoebztuy@webmail.polslinux.it>
References: <20120102144514.100632pruoebztuy@webmail.polslinux.it>
Message-ID: <4F01B870.1070803@archlinux.org>

On 01/02/2012 03:45 PM, admin at polslinux.it wrote:
> Hello :)
> I would like to maintain these packages that haven't been updated for
> long time:
> 

> Firefox-pgo (14/08/2011)

this can be deleted. We have pgo enabled in our default package since
firefox 4


-- 
Ionu?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 554 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120102/a2fff402/attachment.asc>

From barthalion at gmail.com  Mon Jan  2 09:37:10 2012
From: barthalion at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QmFydMWCb21pZWogUGlvdHJvd3NraQ==?=)
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:37:10 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] about non-updated packages
In-Reply-To: <20120102144514.100632pruoebztuy@webmail.polslinux.it>
References: <20120102144514.100632pruoebztuy@webmail.polslinux.it>
Message-ID: <4F01C116.60505@gmail.com>

First write to maintainers with update or orphan request. After 2 weeks
without respond, you can send request here.

-- 
Bart?omiej Piotrowski
Arch Linux Trusted User
http://archlinux.org/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120102/56fb702f/attachment.asc>

From massimiliano.torromeo at gmail.com  Mon Jan  2 15:39:32 2012
From: massimiliano.torromeo at gmail.com (Massimiliano Torromeo)
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 21:39:32 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] about non-updated packages
In-Reply-To: <20120102144514.100632pruoebztuy@webmail.polslinux.it>
References: <20120102144514.100632pruoebztuy@webmail.polslinux.it>
Message-ID: <1762499.J2sN3ZMdF9@diavel>

In data luned? 2 gennaio 2012 14:45:14, admin at polslinux.it ha scritto:
> Dropbox-experimental (26/12/2011)

How is this even considered not updated "for a long time"!?

Anyway, I updated it now.

-- 
Massimiliano Torromeo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120102/64c89b05/attachment.asc>

From massimiliano.torromeo at gmail.com  Mon Jan  2 17:19:44 2012
From: massimiliano.torromeo at gmail.com (Massimiliano Torromeo)
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 23:19:44 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] about non-updated packages
In-Reply-To: <CAJMSj1y1+A4du2v3wvvoTBED4XnXgBHwdanyc6fXFCfTMS3O3Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20120102144514.100632pruoebztuy@webmail.polslinux.it>
 <1762499.J2sN3ZMdF9@diavel>
 <CAJMSj1y1+A4du2v3wvvoTBED4XnXgBHwdanyc6fXFCfTMS3O3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAN=w4Y00zFd2CjLGdqVCb1HnjoGB1QMnrds_QFythH3J6gMLjw@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Paolo Stivanin <paolostivanin at gmail.com> wrote:
> You was at version 1.1.X and a lot of version have come after that!

You are wrong sir. dropbox-experimental was at 1.3.4 and version 1.3.5
was released only a week ago.

https://github.com/mtorromeo/archlinux-packages/commits/master/dropbox-experimental/PKGBUILD

From admin at polslinux.it  Mon Jan  2 17:19:38 2012
From: admin at polslinux.it (Paolo Stivanin <Polslinux>)
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 23:19:38 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] about non-updated packages
In-Reply-To: <1762499.J2sN3ZMdF9@diavel>
References: <20120102144514.100632pruoebztuy@webmail.polslinux.it>
 <1762499.J2sN3ZMdF9@diavel>
Message-ID: <20120102231938.546833qv54b2yet6@webmail.polslinux.it>

Sorry but i haven't looked at 'last update time' but to the last  
version given.
In fact you were stopped at 1.1.X version and a lot of version have  
come after it!

Massimiliano Torromeo <massimiliano.torromeo at gmail.com> ha scritto:

> In data luned? 2 gennaio 2012 14:45:14, admin at polslinux.it ha scritto:
>> Dropbox-experimental (26/12/2011)
>
> How is this even considered not updated "for a long time"!?
>
> Anyway, I updated it now.
>
> --
> Massimiliano Torromeo


From edumlopes at yahoo.com.br  Mon Jan  2 18:39:52 2012
From: edumlopes at yahoo.com.br (Eduardo Martins Lopes)
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 15:39:52 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [aur-general] orphaned community packages (intel-tbb, arpack,
	libmatio, xml-rpc and aspell-pt)
Message-ID: <1325547592.61298.YahooMailNeo@web122512.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>

Hello guys,?
I have an aur package (opencv-tbb?https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42121) that depends on intel-tbb, but this one is an orphaned community package and i would like to maintain it. Can i upload a pkbuild to the AUR (perhaps with the same name) ? There a few other orphans that would like to adopt, if it's possible:
	* libmatio - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/libmatio/?
	* arpack ?-?http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/arpack/
	* xmlrpc-c - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/xmlrpc-c/
	* aspell-pt -?http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/aspell-pt/
Although i do not use the last ones (except for the dictionary), they fall within the scope of my interests.

Kind regards,
--
Eduardo Martins Lopes - duca

From karol.blazewicz at gmail.com  Mon Jan  2 18:47:56 2012
From: karol.blazewicz at gmail.com (Karol Blazewicz)
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 00:47:56 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] warez in the AUR
Message-ID: <CAO0v=MNbTAsGGBCc-io5C63Bkx6Dz5yXKw=T2LLiDibLx6485w@mail.gmail.com>

We have two warez-orphans:
* battle-chess https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46739
* space-quest-1 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46928

and two packages that have a maintainer that didn't comply with the
notice served (i.e. trontonic's comment on the AUR page of these
packages) in the customary two weeks:
* the-incredible-machine-1 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46491
* the-incredible-machine-2 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46493


I would like to ask a TU to fix these packages as outlined in
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-December/016992.html
Thank you.

From nobody at archlinux.org  Tue Jan  3 04:07:04 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 09:07:04 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120103090704.1660.86377@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 7 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 2 fully signed off packages
* 12 packages missing signoffs
* 5 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (7 total) ==

* fpc-src-2.6.0-1 (any)
* fpc-2.6.0-1 (i686)
* gpac-3824-1 (i686)
* lazarus-0.9.30.2-2 (i686)
* fpc-2.6.0-1 (x86_64)
* gpac-3824-1 (x86_64)
* lazarus-0.9.30.2-2 (x86_64)


== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) ==

* fpc-src-2.6.0-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* expac-0.07-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* fpc-2.6.0-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gpac-3824-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* lazarus-0.9.30.2-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* fpc-2.6.0-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* gpac-3824-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* lazarus-0.9.30.2-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64)
    1/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) ==

* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (x86_64)
    1/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (2 total) ==

* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any)
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64)


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13
* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686), since 2011-11-30
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64), since 2011-11-30


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. dreisner - 2 signoffs


From schiv at archlinux.org  Tue Jan  3 06:57:37 2012
From: schiv at archlinux.org (Ray Rashif)
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 19:57:37 +0800
Subject: [aur-general] orphaned community packages (intel-tbb, arpack,
 libmatio, xml-rpc and aspell-pt)
In-Reply-To: <1325547592.61298.YahooMailNeo@web122512.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
References: <1325547592.61298.YahooMailNeo@web122512.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <CAFEhRJd_0CYkLjwLJ88ZPX8ZvqMrUsL__O3UJXmpG6ADviS3bg@mail.gmail.com>

On 3 January 2012 07:39, Eduardo Martins Lopes <edumlopes at yahoo.com.br> wrote:
> Hello guys,
> I have an aur package (opencv-tbb?https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42121) that depends on intel-tbb, but this one is an orphaned community package and i would like to maintain it. Can i upload a pkbuild to the AUR (perhaps with the same name) ? There a few other orphans that would like to adopt, if it's possible:
> ? ? ? ?* libmatio - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/libmatio/
> ? ? ? ?* arpack ?-?http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/arpack/
> ? ? ? ?* xmlrpc-c - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/xmlrpc-c/
> ? ? ? ?* aspell-pt -?http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/aspell-pt/
> Although i do not use the last ones (except for the dictionary), they fall within the scope of my interests.

Hello

I was supposed to bring intel-tbb to extra and build opencv against
it. I will do that soon, so you don't have to worry about that one
anymore and opencv from repos will have intel-tbb improvement.

As for the others, it depends on the maintainer, the package
popularity, whether it is in use as a make or optional dependency etc.


--
GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1

From eyeswide at gmail.com  Tue Jan  3 13:43:52 2012
From: eyeswide at gmail.com (Jonathan Frazier)
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 13:43:52 -0500
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: nfs-utils-ipv6
Message-ID: <20120103184352.GA25774@tyche.lan>

please remove this as it is no longer needed.

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42300

Jonathan

From rodseth at gmail.com  Tue Jan  3 13:47:59 2012
From: rodseth at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alexander_R=F8dseth?=)
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 19:47:59 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] warez in the AUR
In-Reply-To: <CAO0v=MNbTAsGGBCc-io5C63Bkx6Dz5yXKw=T2LLiDibLx6485w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAO0v=MNbTAsGGBCc-io5C63Bkx6Dz5yXKw=T2LLiDibLx6485w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAG7ayyuCxc46YmH5Vy_WYA_WfFt1dPg_-vMp--COTQXO6WBg6Q@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

While I don't really think a PKGBUILD can count as warez (and believe
the subject is misleading), I agree with "the ioni-solution" of not
linking directly to copyrighted content in the "source" array.
Adopting, modifying and disowning the four packages in question.

-- 
Best regards,
?Alexander R?dseth
?Arch Linux Trusted User
?(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

From rafael.f.f1 at gmail.com  Tue Jan  3 16:00:35 2012
From: rafael.f.f1 at gmail.com (rafael ff1)
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 19:00:35 -0200
Subject: [aur-general] Deletion request
Message-ID: <CALLTvwf8fZ-7fFq=1sC4vVyh80U5=oV=tN9=r0ysEMsitRW7xw@mail.gmail.com>

lib32-nvidia-utils-71xx [1] is not updated since 2007, doesn't comply
with multilib (installs libs in /opt/lib32/usr/lib), orphan, flagged
as out-of-date since Feb 2011 and... no one seems to complain about
it.

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12008

Please delete

From karol.blazewicz at gmail.com  Tue Jan  3 16:23:14 2012
From: karol.blazewicz at gmail.com (Karol Blazewicz)
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 22:23:14 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] warez in the AUR
In-Reply-To: <CAG7ayyuCxc46YmH5Vy_WYA_WfFt1dPg_-vMp--COTQXO6WBg6Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAO0v=MNbTAsGGBCc-io5C63Bkx6Dz5yXKw=T2LLiDibLx6485w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAG7ayyuCxc46YmH5Vy_WYA_WfFt1dPg_-vMp--COTQXO6WBg6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAO0v=MOsYLsoP4A-Gm-Z=TkB9XyaMKeLGQkg_pHLbizfDSkdtw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Alexander R?dseth <rodseth at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While I don't really think a PKGBUILD can count as warez (and believe
> the subject is misleading)

I'll try to be be more precise in the future :-)

[...]
> Adopting, modifying and disowning the four packages in question.

The links are still present in the PKGBUILDs. We still have no rules
against this and I'm not sure I can invoke forum rules here:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Forum_Etiquette#Legality

From maxroder at web.de  Tue Jan  3 16:45:02 2012
From: maxroder at web.de (Max Roder)
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:45:02 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request
Message-ID: <4F0376DE.6050503@web.de>

Hi,

please remove html-mason [1], as it's just a (0-votes) copy of
perl-html-mason (out of date, in addition).

Max

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33124

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120103/7ab64a02/attachment.asc>

From evangelos at foutrelis.com  Tue Jan  3 16:50:44 2012
From: evangelos at foutrelis.com (Evangelos Foutras)
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 23:50:44 +0200
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request
In-Reply-To: <4F0376DE.6050503@web.de>
References: <4F0376DE.6050503@web.de>
Message-ID: <CAA407myzLDMVBM_eJMJ56B2XWLZsDudM9BuRnSQx963nOo8Veg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Max Roder <maxroder at web.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please remove html-mason [1], as it's just a (0-votes) copy of
> perl-html-mason (out of date, in addition).

Removed, thank you.

From gostrc at gmail.com  Tue Jan  3 17:52:28 2012
From: gostrc at gmail.com (Thomas Dziedzic)
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 16:52:28 -0600
Subject: [aur-general] Deletion request
In-Reply-To: <CALLTvwf8fZ-7fFq=1sC4vVyh80U5=oV=tN9=r0ysEMsitRW7xw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALLTvwf8fZ-7fFq=1sC4vVyh80U5=oV=tN9=r0ysEMsitRW7xw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CANFDciGg4ceZRb3KJjegV0pM2eKQL+76RVh8018AYh+v5YHtLg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:00 PM, rafael ff1 <rafael.f.f1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> lib32-nvidia-utils-71xx [1] is not updated since 2007, doesn't comply
> with multilib (installs libs in /opt/lib32/usr/lib), orphan, flagged
> as out-of-date since Feb 2011 and... no one seems to complain about
> it.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12008
>
> Please delete

removed

From jfg4444 at yahoo.ca  Tue Jan  3 18:22:31 2012
From: jfg4444 at yahoo.ca (jfg4444 at yahoo.ca)
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:22:31 -0500
Subject: [aur-general] forgot username linked to e-mail
Message-ID: <1624442.uX5IfCDuam@myhost>

Would you help me get back AUR user account, of which I've lost my username? Its address is jfg4444 at yahoo.ca
Thanks in advance!

From d at falconindy.com  Tue Jan  3 18:51:01 2012
From: d at falconindy.com (Dave Reisner)
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 18:51:01 -0500
Subject: [aur-general] forgot username linked to e-mail
In-Reply-To: <1624442.uX5IfCDuam@myhost>
References: <1624442.uX5IfCDuam@myhost>
Message-ID: <20120103235101.GC693@rampage>

On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 06:22:31PM -0500, jfg4444 at yahoo.ca wrote:
> Would you help me get back AUR user account, of which I've lost my username? Its address is jfg4444 at yahoo.ca
> Thanks in advance!

Email sent.


From edumlopes at yahoo.com.br  Tue Jan  3 19:23:53 2012
From: edumlopes at yahoo.com.br (Eduardo Martins Lopes)
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 16:23:53 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [aur-general] orphaned community packages (intel-tbb, arpack,
	libmatio, xml-rpc and aspell-pt)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEhRJd_0CYkLjwLJ88ZPX8ZvqMrUsL__O3UJXmpG6ADviS3bg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1325547592.61298.YahooMailNeo@web122512.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
 <CAFEhRJd_0CYkLjwLJ88ZPX8ZvqMrUsL__O3UJXmpG6ADviS3bg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1325636633.29760.YahooMailNeo@web122520.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>

Hello Ray and thanks for your reply! 



On 3 January 2012 07:39, Eduardo Martins Lopes <edumlopes at yahoo.com.br> wrote:
>> Hello guys,
>> I have an aur package (opencv-tbb?https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42121) that depends on intel-tbb, but this one is an orphaned community package and i would like to maintain it. Can i upload a pkbuild to the AUR (perhaps with the same name) ? There a few other orphans that would like to adopt, if it's possible:
>> ? ? ? ?* libmatio - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/libmatio/
>> ? ? ? ?* arpack ?-?http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/arpack/
>> ? ? ? ?* xmlrpc-c - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/xmlrpc-c/
>> ? ? ? ?* aspell-pt -?http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/aspell-pt/
>> Although i do not use the last ones (except for the dictionary), they fall within the scope of my interests.

>Hello

>I was supposed to bring intel-tbb to extra and build opencv against
>it. I will do that soon, so you don't have to worry about that one
>anymore and opencv from repos will have intel-tbb improvement.

These are great news!

>As for the others, it depends on the maintainer, the package
>popularity, whether it is in use as a make or optional dependency etc.

Actually the question regarding 
the names is about creating an aur package with the same name of the orphaned ones since the aur is where i can maintain those packages. 

From stephane at archlinux.org  Tue Jan  3 20:01:34 2012
From: stephane at archlinux.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=E9phane?= Gaudreault)
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:01:34 -0500
Subject: [aur-general] Drop mplayer2 from [community]
Message-ID: <2471999.VIf9PZFCMM@assurancetourix>

Mplayer2 was very promising last year when they forked from the original 
mplayer project. One of the main goal of this project was to provide more 
frequent release and updates. Unfortunatly, they failled to provide something 
else after the initial release. This initial release no longer build with 
current tools/libs and contain several major bugs. A workaround was to update 
our pkg to a recent git snapshot. Since then, I do not see any reason to 
continue to update this package which is currently broken.

If there is no objection, I will drop the package from [community]. Users 
should consider to follow mplayer2-git from AUR or the original mplayer from 
[extra].

Cheers,

St?phane

From angvp at archlinux.org  Tue Jan  3 20:25:46 2012
From: angvp at archlinux.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Angel_Vel=E1squez?=)
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:25:46 -0300
Subject: [aur-general] Drop mplayer2 from [community]
In-Reply-To: <2471999.VIf9PZFCMM@assurancetourix>
References: <2471999.VIf9PZFCMM@assurancetourix>
Message-ID: <4F03AA9A.9060207@archlinux.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03/01/12 22:01, St?phane Gaudreault wrote:
> Mplayer2 was very promising last year when they forked from the
> original mplayer project. One of the main goal of this project was
> to provide more frequent release and updates. Unfortunatly, they
> failled to provide something else after the initial release. This
> initial release no longer build with current tools/libs and contain
> several major bugs. A workaround was to update our pkg to a recent
> git snapshot. Since then, I do not see any reason to continue to
> update this package which is currently broken.
> 
> If there is no objection, I will drop the package from [community].
> Users should consider to follow mplayer2-git from AUR or the
> original mplayer from [extra].
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> St?phane

If it's broken move it to AUR .. or ask if some tu wants to maintain
on community.

- -- 
Angel Vel?squez
angvp @ irc.freenode.net
Arch Linux Developer / Trusted User
Linux Counter: #359909
http://www.angvp.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPA6qaAAoJEEKh2xXsEzutg5YH/AsUvTTlxj6NPntsfNasrRwG
U+0PYIXvGrx/AB+IVBsEvOGP9GBeRJVAM3TDQMrm6bqPszW5fH7B2jn/kix7PSlu
pPWfhXmA2qbVWfFVgGpsYT2vFHwn20ezdxFYvGkfkrA9xU9NyzUNlraFe2aIdokF
FeHM0BMUxiJCwariI0OCPOPSZ6LSmGQxIhTIDgelXpujFXVzYgl4Ykz3mNNP0iOp
5weFptJvDpMlm4uCyMpHRV2Cj9k5wPLjCik5J7FcTbUzzcLwb4pqogszFlkUw+83
PQgpuveSRbp/LrUIXkCaSe004+jyUTLTWG+6PhX9HTwDthlTHJWrsU8R1f6SuRI=
=FRsy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

From lists at baums-on-web.de  Tue Jan  3 20:35:43 2012
From: lists at baums-on-web.de (Heiko Baums)
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 02:35:43 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Drop mplayer2 from [community]
In-Reply-To: <4F03AA9A.9060207@archlinux.org>
References: <2471999.VIf9PZFCMM@assurancetourix>
 <4F03AA9A.9060207@archlinux.org>
Message-ID: <20120104023543.5014e000@darkstar>

Am Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:25:46 -0300
schrieb Angel Vel?squez <angvp at archlinux.org>:

> If it's broken move it to AUR .. or ask if some tu wants to maintain
> on community.

If it's broken and doesn't compile anymore, why should it be moved to
AUR? Just drop it.

Heiko

From angvp at archlinux.org  Tue Jan  3 20:40:30 2012
From: angvp at archlinux.org (=?UTF-8?B?QW5nZWwgVmVsw6FzcXVleg==?=)
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:40:30 -0300
Subject: [aur-general] Drop mplayer2 from [community]
In-Reply-To: <20120104023543.5014e000@darkstar>
References: <2471999.VIf9PZFCMM@assurancetourix>
 <4F03AA9A.9060207@archlinux.org> <20120104023543.5014e000@darkstar>
Message-ID: <4F03AE0E.8070106@archlinux.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03/01/12 22:35, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:25:46 -0300 schrieb Angel Vel?squez
> <angvp at archlinux.org>:
> 
>> If it's broken move it to AUR .. or ask if some tu wants to
>> maintain on community.
> 
> If it's broken and doesn't compile anymore, why should it be moved
> to AUR? Just drop it.
> 
> Heiko

Because if maybe somebody find it orphan and lonely and knows how to
fix it, can adopt it ;) instead to re-upload to AUR .. can be moved to
AUR and with a comment that is broken.

Usually our workflow is that .. going to AUR and if it's dead and
unbuildable by some time.. then just drop it.

- -- 
Angel Vel?squez
angvp @ irc.freenode.net
Arch Linux Developer / Trusted User
Linux Counter: #359909
http://www.angvp.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPA64OAAoJEEKh2xXsEzutccAH+wV1h4qOF5UAkmaBhNzoduLP
3lO7A0XvvvJAM9+CDSG3TMgbuI151/gvd/nUS02qdztxO3OP8E6zRSMS3AMCWJOX
Fq1JRqYB0XAU6w8RmBYwR/Ey1ngfoR1CPVcJf0Xv1l181tMYsC5uYUo6b+SC8iCj
u+Qml91/jdPWURroZoa/E4Jq+IzoiAhfQye2RwHMiKFZzagH5pnTDMOicAP3fHR/
Go6jENtU2vErlvdxKBOLt1CEunYZwJD2/BrMVRP8caJQX/UmW7q2dAvC/u1VfGWe
oyiQvUblO1gZaAGNAqpD/jBal453610gd/goTVIqaMeAjWlyAsFykWjqrTGXgpw=
=v33B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

From stephane at archlinux.org  Tue Jan  3 20:45:34 2012
From: stephane at archlinux.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=E9phane?= Gaudreault)
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:45:34 -0500
Subject: [aur-general] Drop mplayer2 from [community]
In-Reply-To: <4F03AE0E.8070106@archlinux.org>
References: <2471999.VIf9PZFCMM@assurancetourix>
 <20120104023543.5014e000@darkstar> <4F03AE0E.8070106@archlinux.org>
Message-ID: <2025470.puLhUPlM9e@assurancetourix>

Le 3 janvier 2012 22:40:30 Angel Vel?squez a ?crit :
> On 03/01/12 22:35, Heiko Baums wrote:
> > Am Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:25:46 -0300 schrieb Angel Vel?squez
> > 
> > <angvp at archlinux.org>:
> >> If it's broken move it to AUR .. or ask if some tu wants to
> >> maintain on community.
> > 
> > If it's broken and doesn't compile anymore, why should it be moved
> > to AUR? Just drop it.
> > 
> > Heiko
> 
> Because if maybe somebody find it orphan and lonely and knows how to
> fix it, can adopt it ;) instead to re-upload to AUR .. can be moved to
> AUR and with a comment that is broken.
> 
> Usually our workflow is that .. going to AUR and if it's dead and
> unbuildable by some time.. then just drop it.

There is already an mplayer2-git pkg in AUR that is more up to date. Anyway, 
it cost nothing to drop it to AUR if someone else could find it useful.

St?phane

From emulava at gmail.com  Tue Jan  3 22:54:54 2012
From: emulava at gmail.com (Java Script)
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 22:54:54 -0500
Subject: [aur-general] Forgotten AUR User Login Name
Message-ID: <CABeayBu4pkgBQHgLe_HusZmxiqkgS80mXGJ0woguAwguNWTo9A@mail.gmail.com>

Hello. I'm at a loss as to logging into the AUR. I've forgotten the
user-name tied to my account.

Could someone please confirm my AUR user-name at the same email registered
to this mailing list?

From d at falconindy.com  Tue Jan  3 23:07:29 2012
From: d at falconindy.com (Dave Reisner)
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 23:07:29 -0500
Subject: [aur-general] Forgotten AUR User Login Name
In-Reply-To: <CABeayBu4pkgBQHgLe_HusZmxiqkgS80mXGJ0woguAwguNWTo9A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABeayBu4pkgBQHgLe_HusZmxiqkgS80mXGJ0woguAwguNWTo9A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120104040729.GE693@rampage>

Email sent.

On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 10:54:54PM -0500, Java Script wrote:
> Hello. I'm at a loss as to logging into the AUR. I've forgotten the
> user-name tied to my account.
> 
> Could someone please confirm my AUR user-name at the same email registered
> to this mailing list?

From bernardobarros2 at gmail.com  Wed Jan  4 00:22:29 2012
From: bernardobarros2 at gmail.com (Bernardo Barros)
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 21:22:29 -0800
Subject: [aur-general] Drop mplayer2 from [community]
In-Reply-To: <2025470.puLhUPlM9e@assurancetourix>
References: <2471999.VIf9PZFCMM@assurancetourix>
 <20120104023543.5014e000@darkstar> <4F03AE0E.8070106@archlinux.org>
 <2025470.puLhUPlM9e@assurancetourix>
Message-ID: <CAOEEKGUD3rG0Z5m05XNBDgST0OzvXTg27kZ8epK7d_ps-M4sWw@mail.gmail.com>

9 months is not that much time.. mplayer2-git works fine here.

From nobody at archlinux.org  Wed Jan  4 04:07:04 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 09:07:04 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120104090704.7631.60677@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 2 fully signed off packages
* 12 packages missing signoffs
* 5 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) ==

* fpc-src-2.6.0-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* expac-0.07-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* fpc-2.6.0-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gpac-3824-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* lazarus-0.9.30.2-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* fpc-2.6.0-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* gpac-3824-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* lazarus-0.9.30.2-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64)
    1/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) ==

* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (x86_64)
    1/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (2 total) ==

* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any)
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64)


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13
* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686), since 2011-11-30
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64), since 2011-11-30


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. thomas - 3 signoffs
2. bisson - 2 signoffs
3. dreisner - 1 signoffs


From schiv at archlinux.org  Wed Jan  4 08:09:04 2012
From: schiv at archlinux.org (Ray Rashif)
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 21:09:04 +0800
Subject: [aur-general] orphaned community packages (intel-tbb, arpack,
 libmatio, xml-rpc and aspell-pt)
In-Reply-To: <1325636633.29760.YahooMailNeo@web122520.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
References: <1325547592.61298.YahooMailNeo@web122512.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
 <CAFEhRJd_0CYkLjwLJ88ZPX8ZvqMrUsL__O3UJXmpG6ADviS3bg@mail.gmail.com>
 <1325636633.29760.YahooMailNeo@web122520.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <CAFEhRJcJ2_pMmMriNUu4Dcpi5cLKKGoiAgLYaFOFtO6Y9FxrbQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 4 January 2012 08:23, Eduardo Martins Lopes <edumlopes at yahoo.com.br> wrote:
> Actually the question regarding the names is about creating an aur package
> with the same name of the orphaned ones since the aur is where i can
> maintain those packages.

Oh no you can't do that. You have to use a different name. For
packages that are out of date it is better to provide the maintainer
(via email or other means) with updated scripts or patches. If they
are not responsive then bring the matter up with everyone. One of us
can at least help to apply the changes verbatim.

-- 
GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1

From superbobry at gmail.com  Wed Jan  4 13:30:40 2012
From: superbobry at gmail.com (Sergei Lebedev)
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 22:30:40 +0400
Subject: [aur-general] Remove `ulex`
Message-ID: <CAFQn-38XgbmFSMMZmGVbFQv3pWnXX83UZPmgs-Q+1Lp3+YUPDQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

Can you please remove `ulex` [1] package, since it was renamed to
`ocaml-ulex` [2], which follows OCaml Packaging Guidelines [3]?

Thanks,
Sergei

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42617
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55537
[3] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/OCaml_Package_Guidelines

From xyne at archlinux.ca  Wed Jan  4 15:00:37 2012
From: xyne at archlinux.ca (Xyne)
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 21:00:37 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Remove `ulex`
In-Reply-To: <CAFQn-38XgbmFSMMZmGVbFQv3pWnXX83UZPmgs-Q+1Lp3+YUPDQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFQn-38XgbmFSMMZmGVbFQv3pWnXX83UZPmgs-Q+1Lp3+YUPDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120104210037.5bbec1f8@archlinux.ca>

Sergei Lebedev wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Can you please remove `ulex` [1] package, since it was renamed to
> `ocaml-ulex` [2], which follows OCaml Packaging Guidelines [3]?
> 
> Thanks,
> Sergei
> 
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42617
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55537
> [3] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/OCaml_Package_Guidelines


done, thanks

From rafael.f.f1 at gmail.com  Wed Jan  4 22:55:32 2012
From: rafael.f.f1 at gmail.com (rafael ff1)
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 01:55:32 -0200
Subject: [aur-general] AUR site down?
Message-ID: <CALLTvwc3Ko3H4YJrqfMDtWX_M86PaBwuhC628poW70irc8c1Vg@mail.gmail.com>

Can't access neither ping AUR web page. Is it down?

$ ping aur.archlinux.org
PING aur.archlinux.org (208.92.232.29) 56(84) bytes of data.
^C
--- aur.archlinux.org ping statistics ---
62 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 61011ms

From d at falconindy.com  Wed Jan  4 23:04:14 2012
From: d at falconindy.com (Dave Reisner)
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 23:04:14 -0500
Subject: [aur-general] AUR site down?
In-Reply-To: <CALLTvwc3Ko3H4YJrqfMDtWX_M86PaBwuhC628poW70irc8c1Vg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALLTvwc3Ko3H4YJrqfMDtWX_M86PaBwuhC628poW70irc8c1Vg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120105040414.GG693@rampage>

On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 01:55:32AM -0200, rafael ff1 wrote:
> Can't access neither ping AUR web page. Is it down?
> 
> $ ping aur.archlinux.org
> PING aur.archlinux.org (208.92.232.29) 56(84) bytes of data.
> ^C
> --- aur.archlinux.org ping statistics ---
> 62 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 61011ms

It would have responded on the 63rd packet.

d

P.S. yes, we know

From jon at pandorica.net  Wed Jan  4 23:50:59 2012
From: jon at pandorica.net (Jonathan Wilson)
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 21:50:59 -0700
Subject: [aur-general] Orphan request - android-2.2, android-2.3
Message-ID: <CAPNsw_UhEy5zSgu+_NLGzwgK1wXfj4yg-pR0_qE1qDE2S7tAJA@mail.gmail.com>

The packages android-2.2 and android-2.3 are both maintained by Figo.zhang
and have been obsolete for many months. I emailed the dev about 6 weeks
ago, and received no response. Please orphan the packages, and I will pick
them up and maintain them.

Thanks.

From gostrc at gmail.com  Thu Jan  5 00:04:38 2012
From: gostrc at gmail.com (Thomas Dziedzic)
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 23:04:38 -0600
Subject: [aur-general] Orphan request - android-2.2, android-2.3
In-Reply-To: <CAPNsw_UhEy5zSgu+_NLGzwgK1wXfj4yg-pR0_qE1qDE2S7tAJA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPNsw_UhEy5zSgu+_NLGzwgK1wXfj4yg-pR0_qE1qDE2S7tAJA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CANFDciFPyi85gTfbWoj2zaxuCrCoyDWYH71qDjJ+QVaiBF61tA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Jonathan Wilson <jon at pandorica.net> wrote:
> The packages android-2.2 and android-2.3 are both maintained by Figo.zhang
> and have been obsolete for many months. I emailed the dev about 6 weeks
> ago, and received no response. Please orphan the packages, and I will pick
> them up and maintain them.
>
> Thanks.

done

From i.caught.air at gmail.com  Thu Jan  5 00:34:09 2012
From: i.caught.air at gmail.com (Alex Belanger)
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:34:09 -0500
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request - libace
Message-ID: <4F053651.9030305@gmail.com>

After flagging out-of-date the package 'ace' and contacting the 
maintainer without a response, I created my own package 'libace' in a 
desesperate way to help others.

Few months passed.
Yesterday I noticed the maintainer came back to orphan his package, so I 
adopted it.

I'm now the maintainer of 'ace' and 'libace' - both identical packages.
I would like the temporary 'libace' removed in favor of the oldest one.

Thanks.

From barthalion at gmail.com  Thu Jan  5 00:43:59 2012
From: barthalion at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QmFydMWCb21pZWogUGlvdHJvd3NraQ==?=)
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 06:43:59 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request - libace
In-Reply-To: <4F053651.9030305@gmail.com>
References: <4F053651.9030305@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F05389F.9030909@gmail.com>

Done.

-- 
Bart?omiej Piotrowski
Arch Linux Trusted User
http://archlinux.org/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120105/ca494970/attachment.asc>

From nobody at archlinux.org  Thu Jan  5 04:07:04 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 09:07:04 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120105090704.31350.59257@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 4 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 2 fully signed off packages
* 11 packages missing signoffs
* 5 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) ==

* pkgtools-23-3 (i686)
* vdrift-2011.10.22-2 (i686)
* pkgtools-23-3 (x86_64)
* vdrift-2011.10.22-2 (x86_64)


== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (9 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gpac-3824-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* pkgtools-23-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gpac-3824-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64)
    1/2 signoffs
* pkgtools-23-3 (x86_64)
    1/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) ==

* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (x86_64)
    1/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (2 total) ==

* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any)
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64)


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13
* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686), since 2011-11-30
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64), since 2011-11-30


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. dan - 7 signoffs
2. tomegun - 5 signoffs
3. allan - 5 signoffs
4. pierre - 5 signoffs
5. thomas - 3 signoffs


From l.jirkovsky at gmail.com  Thu Jan  5 05:33:16 2012
From: l.jirkovsky at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?THVrw6HFoSBKaXJrb3Zza8O9?=)
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 11:33:16 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: nfs-utils-ipv6
In-Reply-To: <20120103184352.GA25774@tyche.lan>
References: <20120103184352.GA25774@tyche.lan>
Message-ID: <CAFa9FQvOCAaFaXsqtaUMooE8aqR2hk9wifYq1u-xQt8ELjJh0A@mail.gmail.com>

On 3 January 2012 19:43, Jonathan Frazier <eyeswide at gmail.com> wrote:
> please remove this as it is no longer needed.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42300
>
> Jonathan

Done, thank you.

From massimiliano.torromeo at gmail.com  Thu Jan  5 08:26:56 2012
From: massimiliano.torromeo at gmail.com (Massimiliano Torromeo)
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 14:26:56 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] PKGBUILD for prospective Red Eclipse 1.2
In-Reply-To: <1325769498.4662.14.camel@mell>
References: <1325769498.4662.14.camel@mell>
Message-ID: <CAN=w4Y2oK-T=f6kxKz+UDxxZfWkiVFV6T29JWCxB-TpdrU0Pkw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,
makedepends should only contain dependencies that are required to
build tha package but not to run the resulting application and
therefore should not contain dependencies already specified in
depends.

You can find all the informations you need on PKGBUILDs on the wiki:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD

Apart from that the suggestions look good and I will apply them as
soon as 1.2 is released.

Thanks.

On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Martin Erik Werner
<martinerikwerner at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, with the new (hopefully soonish) release of Red Eclipse 1.2 the
> PKGBUILD for it could use some modification.
>
> I've included here my suggestion for the new version, which should work
> once 1.2 is released (though incompatible with current 1.1). I'm using
> something similar currently for the redeclipse-svn package at
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38550 .
>
> I am not completely sure how the (make)depends should be
> organized/duplicated, are there any clear guidelines for that anywhere?
>
>
> ### $ cat PKGBUILD
> # Contributor: Massimiliano Torromeo <massimiliano.torromeo at gmail.com>
> # Updater: Martin Erik Werner ("arand") <martinerikwerner at gmail.com>
>
> pkgname=redeclipse
> pkgver=1.2
> pkgrel=1
> pkgdesc="A single-player and multi-player first-person ego-shooter,
> built as a total conversion of Cube Engine 2"
> arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
> url="http://redeclipse.net"
> license=('custom' 'CC-BY-SA-3.0' 'ZLIB' 'MIT')
> depends=('sdl_image' 'libgl' 'sdl_mixer')
> makedepends=('mesa' 'imagemagick' 'sdl_image' 'libgl' 'sdl_mixer')
> source=(http://downloads.sourceforge.net/${pkgname}/${pkgname}_
> ${pkgver}_linux_bsd.tar.bz2)
>
> md5sums=('replaceme')
>
> build() {
> ? ? ? ?cd "$srcdir/$pkgname/src"
> ? ? ? ?make
> }
>
> package() {
> ? ? ? ?cd "$srcdir/$pkgname"
>
> ? ? ? ?make -C DESTDIR="$pkgdir" prefix=/usr system-install
>
> ? ? ? ?install -Dm644 license.txt
> "$pkgdir/usr/share/licenses/$pkgname/LICENSE"
> ? ? ? ?install -Dm644 trademark.txt
> "$pkgdir/usr/share/licenses/$pkgname/TRADEMARK"
> }
> ###
>
> Thanks
> --
> Martin Erik Werner <martinerikwerner at gmail.com>

From martinerikwerner at gmail.com  Thu Jan  5 09:30:11 2012
From: martinerikwerner at gmail.com (Martin Erik Werner)
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:30:11 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] PKGBUILD for prospective Red Eclipse 1.2
In-Reply-To: <CAN=w4Y2oK-T=f6kxKz+UDxxZfWkiVFV6T29JWCxB-TpdrU0Pkw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1325769498.4662.14.camel@mell>
 <CAN=w4Y2oK-T=f6kxKz+UDxxZfWkiVFV6T29JWCxB-TpdrU0Pkw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1325773811.4662.28.camel@mell>

Hi, thanks for picking it up!

So it is the case that the depends() should be treated as included in
the makedepends()? RE does need libsdl in order to compile, AND in order
to run.
E.g. on Debian, the build-depends is libsdl-mixer1.2-dev, and the
runtime depends is libsdl-mixer1.2

But in a PKGBUILD I only need to specify the runtime depend?

The PKGBUILD documentation could be interpreted to imply this, but in
that case I don't feel it makes a very good job in doing so :)

--
Martin Erik Werner <martinerikwerner at gmail.com>

On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 14:26 +0100, Massimiliano Torromeo wrote:
> Hi,
> makedepends should only contain dependencies that are required to
> build tha package but not to run the resulting application and
> therefore should not contain dependencies already specified in
> depends.
> 
> You can find all the informations you need on PKGBUILDs on the wiki:
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD
> 
> Apart from that the suggestions look good and I will apply them as
> soon as 1.2 is released.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Martin Erik Werner
> <martinerikwerner at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi, with the new (hopefully soonish) release of Red Eclipse 1.2 the
> > PKGBUILD for it could use some modification.
> >
> > I've included here my suggestion for the new version, which should work
> > once 1.2 is released (though incompatible with current 1.1). I'm using
> > something similar currently for the redeclipse-svn package at
> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38550 .
> >
> > I am not completely sure how the (make)depends should be
> > organized/duplicated, are there any clear guidelines for that anywhere?
> >
> >
> > ### $ cat PKGBUILD
> > # Contributor: Massimiliano Torromeo <massimiliano.torromeo at gmail.com>
> > # Updater: Martin Erik Werner ("arand") <martinerikwerner at gmail.com>
> >
> > pkgname=redeclipse
> > pkgver=1.2
> > pkgrel=1
> > pkgdesc="A single-player and multi-player first-person ego-shooter,
> > built as a total conversion of Cube Engine 2"
> > arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
> > url="http://redeclipse.net"
> > license=('custom' 'CC-BY-SA-3.0' 'ZLIB' 'MIT')
> > depends=('sdl_image' 'libgl' 'sdl_mixer')
> > makedepends=('mesa' 'imagemagick' 'sdl_image' 'libgl' 'sdl_mixer')
> > source=(http://downloads.sourceforge.net/${pkgname}/${pkgname}_
> > ${pkgver}_linux_bsd.tar.bz2)
> >
> > md5sums=('replaceme')
> >
> > build() {
> >        cd "$srcdir/$pkgname/src"
> >        make
> > }
> >
> > package() {
> >        cd "$srcdir/$pkgname"
> >
> >        make -C DESTDIR="$pkgdir" prefix=/usr system-install
> >
> >        install -Dm644 license.txt
> > "$pkgdir/usr/share/licenses/$pkgname/LICENSE"
> >        install -Dm644 trademark.txt
> > "$pkgdir/usr/share/licenses/$pkgname/TRADEMARK"
> > }
> > ###
> >
> > Thanks
> > --
> > Martin Erik Werner <martinerikwerner at gmail.com>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120105/fc50d377/attachment.asc>

From massimiliano.torromeo at gmail.com  Thu Jan  5 10:06:41 2012
From: massimiliano.torromeo at gmail.com (Massimiliano Torromeo)
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 16:06:41 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] PKGBUILD for prospective Red Eclipse 1.2
In-Reply-To: <1325773811.4662.28.camel@mell>
References: <1325769498.4662.14.camel@mell>
 <CAN=w4Y2oK-T=f6kxKz+UDxxZfWkiVFV6T29JWCxB-TpdrU0Pkw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1325773811.4662.28.camel@mell>
Message-ID: <CAN=w4Y2xC7hv1pRDYGCzS1_awLMdSb=uC3fBVkqrGfEKXgYUaQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Martin Erik Werner
<martinerikwerner at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, thanks for picking it up!
>
> So it is the case that the depends() should be treated as included in
> the makedepends()? RE does need libsdl in order to compile, AND in order
> to run.

Correct.

> E.g. on Debian, the build-depends is libsdl-mixer1.2-dev, and the
> runtime depends is libsdl-mixer1.2

In Arch there are no -dev packages; All the libs also include the headers.

> But in a PKGBUILD I only need to specify the runtime depend?
>
> The PKGBUILD documentation could be interpreted to imply this, but in
> that case I don't feel it makes a very good job in doing so :)

From nobody at archlinux.org  Fri Jan  6 04:07:04 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 09:07:04 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120106090704.25856.83934@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 2 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 3 fully signed off packages
* 12 packages missing signoffs
* 5 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) ==

* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (i686)
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (x86_64)


== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gpac-3824-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* pkgtools-23-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gpac-3824-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64)
    1/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (x86_64)
    1/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) ==

* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (x86_64)
    1/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (3 total) ==

* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any)
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64)
* pkgtools-23-3 (x86_64)


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13
* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686), since 2011-11-30
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64), since 2011-11-30


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. eric - 10 signoffs
2. bpiotrowski - 5 signoffs
3. foutrelis - 3 signoffs
4. thomas - 1 signoffs
5. dreisner - 1 signoffs


From crisjss at gmail.com  Fri Jan  6 06:51:13 2012
From: crisjss at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Crist=F3v=E3o?= Sousa)
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 11:51:13 +0000
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: aspell-pt-pre_ao
Message-ID: <1721125.xf0pLAnYqC@kapa42>

Please delete this package of mine 
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55583
because I put wrong name "aspell-pt-pre_ao" (notice the underscore)

Good one is "aspell-pt-pre-ao" (without underscore).

Thnaks,
C. Sousa

From evangelos at foutrelis.com  Fri Jan  6 06:55:38 2012
From: evangelos at foutrelis.com (Evangelos Foutras)
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 13:55:38 +0200
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: aspell-pt-pre_ao
In-Reply-To: <1721125.xf0pLAnYqC@kapa42>
References: <1721125.xf0pLAnYqC@kapa42>
Message-ID: <CAA407mwEkkPOoqjBzEGuK3sDKUgDDwgoc5j7_BZTfGQ+Tk6hmw@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Crist?v?o Sousa <crisjss at gmail.com> wrote:
> Please delete this package of mine
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55583
> because I put wrong name "aspell-pt-pre_ao" (notice the underscore)

Removed.

From nobody at archlinux.org  Sat Jan  7 04:07:05 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 09:07:05 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120107090705.29899.29628@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 10 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 3 fully signed off packages
* 20 packages missing signoffs
* 7 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (10 total) ==

* gogglesmm-0.12.5-2 (i686)
* me-tv-2.0.1-3 (i686)
* openscenegraph-3.0.1-3 (i686)
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (i686)
* xfmedia-0.9.2-10 (i686)
* gogglesmm-0.12.5-2 (x86_64)
* me-tv-2.0.1-3 (x86_64)
* openscenegraph-3.0.1-3 (x86_64)
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (x86_64)
* xfmedia-0.9.2-10 (x86_64)


== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (18 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gogglesmm-0.12.5-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* me-tv-2.0.1-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* openscenegraph-3.0.1-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* pkgtools-23-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* xfmedia-0.9.2-10 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gogglesmm-0.12.5-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* me-tv-2.0.1-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* openscenegraph-3.0.1-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64)
    1/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (x86_64)
    1/2 signoffs
* xfmedia-0.9.2-10 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) ==

* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (x86_64)
    1/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (3 total) ==

* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any)
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64)
* pkgtools-23-3 (x86_64)


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (7 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13
* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686), since 2011-11-30
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64), since 2011-11-30
* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (i686), since 2011-12-23
* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (x86_64), since 2011-12-23


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. ttopper - 6 signoffs
2. thomas - 1 signoffs


From stefanwilkens at gmail.com  Sat Jan  7 11:40:27 2012
From: stefanwilkens at gmail.com (Stefan Wilkens)
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 17:40:27 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [Removal Request] Multiple packages.
Message-ID: <CA+4o_oHeaxpR=aY4UwV3x2sNxGYWHyMG4TKA_9M7GnZ50vrUyA@mail.gmail.com>

Did a bit of a sweep, more to come after this as I'm going through the
orphans starting in 2005. For those of you interested in maintaining
the AUR, we're somewhat active here:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User_talk:Thebishop

package: xmms-alarm
link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=738
reason: no updates since 2005, upstream dead, no alternative links

package: iptlogger
link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1441&detail=1
reason: no updates since 2005, upstream development stopped 2007,
depends on netfilter for (2.4 and 2.6x kernels) and php4

package: squidguard
link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1464
reason: replaced by maintained version here
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24284

package: klipoquery
link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1567
reason: no development since 2005, depends on kde 3.x and kdelibs 3.x.
While we do still have kdelibs 3.x, kde3 has long since gone.

package: ksystemlog
link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2206
reason: original upstream 404, has since been intergrated with kde
http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/kdeadmin-ksystemlog/

package: bulldozer
link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2085
reason: upstream site 404, depends on gnu-make 3.80 (we're on 3.82)

package: libcoaster
link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2363
reason: upstream 404

package: gshrooms
link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2379
reason: no development since 2005, depends on gaim which is no longer available

cheers.

From superbobry at gmail.com  Sat Jan  7 15:20:55 2012
From: superbobry at gmail.com (Sergei Lebedev)
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 00:20:55 +0400
Subject: [aur-general] Disown request for `menhir`
Message-ID: <CAFQn-381Umh3K2Pt0iqYzVH0VqAH=1tYbhwTD0Fvduw5LQK0_g@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

Is it possible to disown `menhir` [*] package? It has been flagged as OOD
since October, and maintainer seems to ignore the comments completely.

Thanks,
Sergei

[*] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15726

From gostrc at gmail.com  Sat Jan  7 15:24:12 2012
From: gostrc at gmail.com (Thomas Dziedzic)
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 14:24:12 -0600
Subject: [aur-general] Disown request for `menhir`
In-Reply-To: <CAFQn-381Umh3K2Pt0iqYzVH0VqAH=1tYbhwTD0Fvduw5LQK0_g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFQn-381Umh3K2Pt0iqYzVH0VqAH=1tYbhwTD0Fvduw5LQK0_g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CANFDciHvzVROcULw5HGKnE2UTqaRU1hMjoeJE9gCZsY_akzdJA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Sergei Lebedev <superbobry at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to disown `menhir` [*] package? It has been flagged as OOD
> since October, and maintainer seems to ignore the comments completely.
>
> Thanks,
> Sergei
>
> [*] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15726

have you emailed the maintainer? if not, please do so

From superbobry at gmail.com  Sat Jan  7 17:50:03 2012
From: superbobry at gmail.com (Sergei Lebedev)
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 02:50:03 +0400
Subject: [aur-general] Disown request for `menhir`
In-Reply-To: <CANFDciHvzVROcULw5HGKnE2UTqaRU1hMjoeJE9gCZsY_akzdJA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFQn-381Umh3K2Pt0iqYzVH0VqAH=1tYbhwTD0Fvduw5LQK0_g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANFDciHvzVROcULw5HGKnE2UTqaRU1hMjoeJE9gCZsY_akzdJA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAFQn-3_dR_UyqtzLgb7Um_czfYoZG-G8CV-CBQRwoUKDTxwL1Q@mail.gmail.com>

Okay, I will, thanks!

On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Thomas Dziedzic <gostrc at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Sergei Lebedev <superbobry at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is it possible to disown `menhir` [*] package? It has been flagged as OOD
> > since October, and maintainer seems to ignore the comments completely.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sergei
> >
> > [*] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15726
>
> have you emailed the maintainer? if not, please do so
>

From rafael.f.f1 at gmail.com  Sat Jan  7 21:14:20 2012
From: rafael.f.f1 at gmail.com (rafael ff1)
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 00:14:20 -0200
Subject: [aur-general] Deletion request
Message-ID: <CALLTvwfSfiiMjPpCByPBA-iJikoGdkZiSOM-YJj9fcGVD7x5eA@mail.gmail.com>

'mmc-lin' is a duplicate of 'mobilemediaconverter'. Even though the
first one seems to be more up-to-date, it is broken for some time and
the maintainer didn't even posted a comment nor a fix for the bug
reported.

[1] mmc-lin: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31686
[2] mobilemediaconverter https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18409

Please delete 'mmc-lin'

Thanks

From cuihao.leo at gmail.com  Sat Jan  7 22:31:01 2012
From: cuihao.leo at gmail.com (=?GB2312?B?tN7lsCAoQ1VJIEhhbyk=?=)
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 11:31:01 +0800
Subject: [aur-general] Orphan request: ttf-hanazono
Message-ID: <CAJm2p=JV=9PW6uogp2WeEa8bWbfOxpobWkhNcAVVnsW=ADhiyA@mail.gmail.com>

Please orphan ttf-hanazono:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22874

The package has been marked outdated for nearly 2 months. I have
emailed current maintainer 2 weeks ago but no reply.

I noticed that current maintainer is unactive now. Many of his
packages are outdated.

I want to adopt it and keep it updated. Please disown it.

Thanks.

From rodseth at gmail.com  Sat Jan  7 22:36:12 2012
From: rodseth at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alexander_R=F8dseth?=)
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 04:36:12 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Orphan request: ttf-hanazono
In-Reply-To: <CAJm2p=JV=9PW6uogp2WeEa8bWbfOxpobWkhNcAVVnsW=ADhiyA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJm2p=JV=9PW6uogp2WeEa8bWbfOxpobWkhNcAVVnsW=ADhiyA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAG7ayyvBs7z5fKQmvein70+9inLrR-Z7Fq+jzHQBrSv+3MUM3g@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Disowned ttf-hanazono. Thank you.

-- 
Cordially,
?Alexander R?dseth
?Arch Linux Trusted User
?(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

From barthalion at gmail.com  Sun Jan  8 01:23:19 2012
From: barthalion at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QmFydMWCb21pZWogUGlvdHJvd3NraQ==?=)
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 07:23:19 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Deletion request
In-Reply-To: <CALLTvwfSfiiMjPpCByPBA-iJikoGdkZiSOM-YJj9fcGVD7x5eA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALLTvwfSfiiMjPpCByPBA-iJikoGdkZiSOM-YJj9fcGVD7x5eA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F093657.3040605@gmail.com>

Done.

-- 
Bart?omiej Piotrowski
Arch Linux Trusted User
http://archlinux.org/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120108/fcc5c8f5/attachment-0001.asc>

From nobody at archlinux.org  Sun Jan  8 04:07:05 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 09:07:05 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120108090705.21300.38016@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 4 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 3 fully signed off packages
* 22 packages missing signoffs
* 7 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) ==

* ndiswrapper-1.57-3 (i686)
* vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (i686)
* ndiswrapper-1.57-3 (x86_64)
* vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (x86_64)


== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gogglesmm-0.12.5-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* me-tv-2.0.1-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* ndiswrapper-1.57-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* openscenegraph-3.0.1-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* pkgtools-23-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* xfmedia-0.9.2-10 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gogglesmm-0.12.5-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* me-tv-2.0.1-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* ndiswrapper-1.57-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* openscenegraph-3.0.1-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64)
    1/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (x86_64)
    1/2 signoffs
* xfmedia-0.9.2-10 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) ==

* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (x86_64)
    1/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (3 total) ==

* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any)
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64)
* pkgtools-23-3 (x86_64)


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (7 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13
* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686), since 2011-11-30
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64), since 2011-11-30
* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (i686), since 2011-12-23
* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (x86_64), since 2011-12-23


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==



From markus at unterwaditzer.net  Sun Jan  8 04:23:32 2012
From: markus at unterwaditzer.net (Markus Unterwaditzer)
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 10:23:32 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [Review request] chrontel-wetab-rpm
Message-ID: <3a2b093b-a35a-4d9c-9a4f-a40230902904@email.android.com>

Could somebody look at this package

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55619

and tell me if the PKGBUILD is okay and "standards compilant"?

From bluewind at xinu.at  Sun Jan  8 04:53:12 2012
From: bluewind at xinu.at (Florian Pritz)
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 10:53:12 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [Review request] chrontel-wetab-rpm
In-Reply-To: <3a2b093b-a35a-4d9c-9a4f-a40230902904@email.android.com>
References: <3a2b093b-a35a-4d9c-9a4f-a40230902904@email.android.com>
Message-ID: <4F096788.50504@xinu.at>

On 08.01.2012 10:23, Markus Unterwaditzer wrote:
> Could somebody look at this package
> 
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55619
> 
> and tell me if the PKGBUILD is okay and "standards compilant"?

You could replace the version in _rpmname with $pkgver so it's easier to
update.

Why is $arch x86_64 only and not i686? Does it fail to build on i686?

Use install -Dm755 in package() when you are installing binaries.
-D will create the target directory automatically so you don't need
mkdir and -m755 will ensure that the permissions are correct.

> cp "${srcdir}/${_rpmextractname}/resources/fw7036.bin" "${pkgdir}/lib/firmware/chrontel"

If you do something like this please either add a slash at the end so
it's obvious that chrontel is a directory or just add the whole filename.

Looks good otherwise.

-- 
Florian Pritz

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120108/1631a1d2/attachment.asc>

From markus at unterwaditzer.net  Sun Jan  8 05:54:18 2012
From: markus at unterwaditzer.net (Markus Unterwaditzer)
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 11:54:18 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [Review request] chrontel-wetab-rpm
In-Reply-To: <4F096788.50504@xinu.at>
References: <3a2b093b-a35a-4d9c-9a4f-a40230902904@email.android.com>
 <4F096788.50504@xinu.at>
Message-ID: <520e94b9-3170-449e-b50f-144c1a4f9676@email.android.com>

The architecture is x86_64, because the package itself is for the WeTab only, which is x86_64. I dont think it fails to build on i686, but there it would be useless.

Thanks for the suggestions.

Florian Pritz <bluewind at xinu.at> wrote:

On 08.01.2012 10:23, Markus Unterwaditzer wrote:
> Could somebody look at this package
> 
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55619
> 
> and tell me if the PKGBUILD is okay and "standards compilant"?

You could replace the version in _rpmname with $pkgver so it's easier to
update.

Why is $arch x86_64 only and not i686? Does it fail to build on i686?

Use install -Dm755 in package() when you are installing binaries.
-D will create the target directory automatically so you don't need
mkdir and -m755 will ensure that the permissions are correct.

> cp "${srcdir}/${_rpmextractname}/resources/fw7036.bin" "${pkgdir}/lib/firmware/chrontel"

If you do something like this please either add a slash at the end so
it's obvious that chrontel is a directory or just add the whole filename.

Looks good otherwise.

-- 
Florian Pritz


From jesse.jaara at gmail.com  Sun Jan  8 05:59:53 2012
From: jesse.jaara at gmail.com (Jesse Juhani Jaara)
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:59:53 +0200
Subject: [aur-general] [Review request] chrontel-wetab-rpm
In-Reply-To: <520e94b9-3170-449e-b50f-144c1a4f9676@email.android.com>
References: <3a2b093b-a35a-4d9c-9a4f-a40230902904@email.android.com>
 <4F096788.50504@xinu.at>
 <520e94b9-3170-449e-b50f-144c1a4f9676@email.android.com>
Message-ID: <1454982.Zf2NIIHMWq@pii>

> The architecture is x86_64, because the package itself is for the WeTab
> only, which is x86_64. I dont think it fails to build on i686, but there it
> would be useless.
Seems the wetab has a regular Intel Atom CPU so it is possible to run i686
on it too....

From lucak3 at gmail.com  Sun Jan  8 06:11:19 2012
From: lucak3 at gmail.com (Luca Bennati)
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 12:11:19 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Cleanup request
Message-ID: <CAK6tggzvJ+zOLM2WfhyuuRRrLO=XULpMF9R0uwBZ5YjkiTpSUA@mail.gmail.com>

This is the context:
gle (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1863) is outdated and
orphaned. I prepared a new PKGBUILD, but then I found those other packages
on AUR:
gle-graphics (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31267) also
outdated but not orphaned
gle4 (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12162) outdated, orphaned
and a clear dup

Now, while it is clear that gle4 should be removed or at least merged, I
would like to ask which package between gle and gle-graphics would be
merged in the other.
Upstream site names it 'GLE', but in some part of the tarball it's called
'gle-graphics'.
What is the official stance?

From markus at unterwaditzer.net  Sun Jan  8 07:55:39 2012
From: markus at unterwaditzer.net (Markus Unterwaditzer)
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 13:55:39 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [Review request] chrontel-wetab-rpm
In-Reply-To: <1454982.Zf2NIIHMWq@pii>
References: <3a2b093b-a35a-4d9c-9a4f-a40230902904@email.android.com>
 <4F096788.50504@xinu.at>
 <520e94b9-3170-449e-b50f-144c1a4f9676@email.android.com>
 <1454982.Zf2NIIHMWq@pii>
Message-ID: <1326027339.24149.0.camel@localhost.localdomain>

Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2012, 12:59 +0200 schrieb Jesse Juhani Jaara:
> > The architecture is x86_64, because the package itself is for the WeTab
> > only, which is x86_64. I dont think it fails to build on i686, but there it
> > would be useless.
> Seems the wetab has a regular Intel Atom CPU so it is possible to run i686
> on it too....
> 
Okay, whatever, i'll change it to x86_64 and i686


From markus at unterwaditzer.net  Sun Jan  8 08:21:47 2012
From: markus at unterwaditzer.net (Markus Unterwaditzer)
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 14:21:47 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [Review request] chrontel-wetab-rpm
In-Reply-To: <4F096788.50504@xinu.at>
References: <3a2b093b-a35a-4d9c-9a4f-a40230902904@email.android.com>
 <4F096788.50504@xinu.at>
Message-ID: <1326028907.24149.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>

Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2012, 10:53 +0100 schrieb Florian Pritz:
> On 08.01.2012 10:23, Markus Unterwaditzer wrote:
> > Could somebody look at this package
> > 
> > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55619
> > 
> > and tell me if the PKGBUILD is okay and "standards compilant"?
> 
> You could replace the version in _rpmname with $pkgver so it's easier to
> update.

That's not that easy, because the download contains a hyphen instead of
a underscore. So i use search and replace in my PKGBUILD now.

> 
> Why is $arch x86_64 only and not i686? Does it fail to build on i686?
> 
> Use install -Dm755 in package() when you are installing binaries.
> -D will create the target directory automatically so you don't need
> mkdir and -m755 will ensure that the permissions are correct.
> 

Done.

> > cp "${srcdir}/${_rpmextractname}/resources/fw7036.bin" "${pkgdir}/lib/firmware/chrontel"
> 
> If you do something like this please either add a slash at the end so
> it's obvious that chrontel is a directory or just add the whole filename.

Done, i've replaced it with the install command.


From stefan-husmann at t-online.de  Sun Jan  8 15:37:52 2012
From: stefan-husmann at t-online.de (Stefan Husmann)
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 21:37:52 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Deletion request: tumbler-devel
Message-ID: <4F09FEA0.7050908@t-online.de>

Hello,

please delete tumbler-devel, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42721 .

It is older than the stable version in [extra], which also uses the same sources.

Regards Stefan

From rodseth at gmail.com  Sun Jan  8 16:14:27 2012
From: rodseth at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alexander_R=F8dseth?=)
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 22:14:27 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Deletion request: tumbler-devel
In-Reply-To: <4F09FEA0.7050908@t-online.de>
References: <4F09FEA0.7050908@t-online.de>
Message-ID: <CAG7ayytNswNgOEHusQnh5pSsX-8bJBD7O3gD_EYEHz+iHe0_9g@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Removed. Thank you.

-- 
Cordially,
?Alexander R?dseth
?Arch Linux Trusted User
?(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

From nobody at archlinux.org  Mon Jan  9 04:07:04 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 09:07:04 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120109090704.17155.64107@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 6 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 3 fully signed off packages
* 24 packages missing signoffs
* 5 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) ==

* fcron-3.0.6-5 (i686)
* gogglesmm-0.12.6-1 (i686)
* packagekit-0.6.19-5 (i686)
* fcron-3.0.6-5 (x86_64)
* gogglesmm-0.12.6-1 (x86_64)
* packagekit-0.6.19-5 (x86_64)


== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (22 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* fcron-3.0.6-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gogglesmm-0.12.6-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* me-tv-2.0.1-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* ndiswrapper-1.57-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* openscenegraph-3.0.1-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* pkgtools-23-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* xfmedia-0.9.2-10 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* fcron-3.0.6-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* gogglesmm-0.12.6-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* me-tv-2.0.1-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* ndiswrapper-1.57-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* openscenegraph-3.0.1-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (x86_64)
    1/2 signoffs
* xfmedia-0.9.2-10 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) ==

* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (x86_64)
    1/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (3 total) ==

* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any)
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64)
* pkgtools-23-3 (x86_64)


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13
* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25
* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (i686), since 2011-12-23
* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (x86_64), since 2011-12-23


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. tomegun - 7 signoffs
2. bpiotrowski - 5 signoffs
3. bluewind - 4 signoffs
4. stativ - 1 signoffs
5. foutrelis - 1 signoffs


From ballogyor at gmail.com  Mon Jan  9 10:53:26 2012
From: ballogyor at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?B?QmFsbPMgR3n2cmd5?=)
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:53:26 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Rename/delete/orphan request
Message-ID: <CAK4rBJQDj7=1cs3qqAYbyG6GwKOqExGS9zHaLG44u-afbX9cEA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi TUs,

1. I renamed the following packages, please move votes and comments
and delete the older one:
- liferea-unity -> liferea-indicator -
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54493
- flickrapi -> python2-flickrapi -
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40323
- python-configglue -> python2-configglue -
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37016
- lazr.restfulclient -> python2-lazr-restfulclient -
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32386
- lazr.uri -> python2-lazr-uri - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32383
- ubuntuone-storage-protocol -> python2-ubuntuone-storageprotocol -
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30080
- wadllib -> python2-wadllib - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32385
- gwibber-dev -> gwibber-devel - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43709

2. Please delete the following orphan, unmaintained packages:
- alacarte-xfce-devel (duplicate of alacarte-xfce) -
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44362
- pan-gtk3 (duplicate of pan) - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50009

3. I would like to request to orphan libindicator package, because it
builds only the gtk3-based library, but I need the gtk2-based library
also for some of my packages. I tried to contact with the maintainer
on 28.11.2011 and 06.12.2011 by e-mail about this, but he didn't
responded my mails. The AUR page of the package:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31343

--
Thanks,
City-busz

From ballogyor at gmail.com  Mon Jan  9 11:03:54 2012
From: ballogyor at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?B?QmFsbPMgR3n2cmd5?=)
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:03:54 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Rename/delete/orphan request
In-Reply-To: <CAK4rBJQDj7=1cs3qqAYbyG6GwKOqExGS9zHaLG44u-afbX9cEA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAK4rBJQDj7=1cs3qqAYbyG6GwKOqExGS9zHaLG44u-afbX9cEA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAK4rBJTU=3hGWPX9pBzo2_JngrV9r=qoUjZxjrf4h4+SED3MAA@mail.gmail.com>

+1 rename request:
- indicator-popper -> popper - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42667

--
Thanks,
City-busz

2012/1/9 Ball? Gy?rgy <ballogyor at gmail.com>:
> Hi TUs,
>
> 1. I renamed the following packages, please move votes and comments
> and delete the older one:
> - liferea-unity -> liferea-indicator -
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54493
> - flickrapi -> python2-flickrapi -
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40323
> - python-configglue -> python2-configglue -
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37016
> - lazr.restfulclient -> python2-lazr-restfulclient -
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32386
> - lazr.uri -> python2-lazr-uri - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32383
> - ubuntuone-storage-protocol -> python2-ubuntuone-storageprotocol -
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30080
> - wadllib -> python2-wadllib - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32385
> - gwibber-dev -> gwibber-devel - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43709
>
> 2. Please delete the following orphan, unmaintained packages:
> - alacarte-xfce-devel (duplicate of alacarte-xfce) -
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44362
> - pan-gtk3 (duplicate of pan) - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50009
>
> 3. I would like to request to orphan libindicator package, because it
> builds only the gtk3-based library, but I need the gtk2-based library
> also for some of my packages. I tried to contact with the maintainer
> on 28.11.2011 and 06.12.2011 by e-mail about this, but he didn't
> responded my mails. The AUR page of the package:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31343
>
> --
> Thanks,
> City-busz

From superbobry at gmail.com  Mon Jan  9 13:20:17 2012
From: superbobry at gmail.com (Sergei Lebedev)
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 22:20:17 +0400
Subject: [aur-general] Disown request for `menhir`
In-Reply-To: <CAFQn-3_dR_UyqtzLgb7Um_czfYoZG-G8CV-CBQRwoUKDTxwL1Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFQn-381Umh3K2Pt0iqYzVH0VqAH=1tYbhwTD0Fvduw5LQK0_g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANFDciHvzVROcULw5HGKnE2UTqaRU1hMjoeJE9gCZsY_akzdJA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFQn-3_dR_UyqtzLgb7Um_czfYoZG-G8CV-CBQRwoUKDTxwL1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAFQn-3_Jv7b3i9rF4r1HVA0=CrrX8BQ1QNS445wvdTtA4JNRPw@mail.gmail.com>

Thomas,

I've emailed the maintainer and got no reply so far, should I wait any
longer?

Sergei

On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 2:50 AM, Sergei Lebedev <superbobry at gmail.com> wrote:

> Okay, I will, thanks!
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Thomas Dziedzic <gostrc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Sergei Lebedev <superbobry at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > Is it possible to disown `menhir` [*] package? It has been flagged as
>> OOD
>> > since October, and maintainer seems to ignore the comments completely.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Sergei
>> >
>> > [*] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15726
>>
>> have you emailed the maintainer? if not, please do so
>>
>
>

From gostrc at gmail.com  Mon Jan  9 13:44:06 2012
From: gostrc at gmail.com (Thomas Dziedzic)
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:44:06 -0600
Subject: [aur-general] Disown request for `menhir`
In-Reply-To: <CAFQn-3_Jv7b3i9rF4r1HVA0=CrrX8BQ1QNS445wvdTtA4JNRPw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFQn-381Umh3K2Pt0iqYzVH0VqAH=1tYbhwTD0Fvduw5LQK0_g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANFDciHvzVROcULw5HGKnE2UTqaRU1hMjoeJE9gCZsY_akzdJA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFQn-3_dR_UyqtzLgb7Um_czfYoZG-G8CV-CBQRwoUKDTxwL1Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFQn-3_Jv7b3i9rF4r1HVA0=CrrX8BQ1QNS445wvdTtA4JNRPw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CANFDciFwMfGVbDSGL3Rj7vrfBGwPJSs6pB_udByA5TFynYAeRg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Sergei Lebedev <superbobry at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> I've emailed the maintainer and got no reply so far, should I wait any
> longer?
>
> Sergei
>
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 2:50 AM, Sergei Lebedev <superbobry at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Okay, I will, thanks!
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Thomas Dziedzic <gostrc at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Sergei Lebedev <superbobry at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hello,
>>> >
>>> > Is it possible to disown `menhir` [*] package? It has been flagged as
>>> OOD
>>> > since October, and maintainer seems to ignore the comments completely.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Sergei
>>> >
>>> > [*] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15726
>>>
>>> have you emailed the maintainer? if not, please do so
>>>
>>
>>

yes, usually we give a week for the maintainer to respond. if in 6
more days he doesn't respond, please post again, possibly with a new
request to disown it and mention that maintainer hasn't responded to
your email.

thanks

From joel at teichroeb.net  Mon Jan  9 18:12:38 2012
From: joel at teichroeb.net (Joel Teichroeb)
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 15:12:38 -0800
Subject: [aur-general] Removal Request
Message-ID: <CA+CzEk9K5Srq18g5-3kX6A5z_ahKaHcd7CqDiiaa3rH_+fviJQ@mail.gmail.com>

Could you remove these packages? They were used for older versions of
wayland and are no longer needed.

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30346 wayland-dri2proto-git
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30347 wayland-eagle-git
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30348 wayland-libdrm-git
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42695 wayland-mesa-git-bin
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46431 libwayland-git

Thanks,
Joel Teichroeb

From gostrc at gmail.com  Mon Jan  9 18:34:51 2012
From: gostrc at gmail.com (Thomas Dziedzic)
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:34:51 -0600
Subject: [aur-general] Removal Request
In-Reply-To: <CA+CzEk9K5Srq18g5-3kX6A5z_ahKaHcd7CqDiiaa3rH_+fviJQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+CzEk9K5Srq18g5-3kX6A5z_ahKaHcd7CqDiiaa3rH_+fviJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CANFDciH3c93_nAnnBTBF99GY0QNxQC6m27S8R0oF1mHXutSgcw@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Joel Teichroeb <joel at teichroeb.net> wrote:
> Could you remove these packages? They were used for older versions of
> wayland and are no longer needed.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30346 wayland-dri2proto-git
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30347 wayland-eagle-git
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30348 wayland-libdrm-git
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42695 wayland-mesa-git-bin
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46431 libwayland-git
>
> Thanks,
> Joel Teichroeb

done

From nobody at archlinux.org  Tue Jan 10 04:07:05 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:07:05 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120110090705.32399.61194@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 16 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 4 fully signed off packages
* 39 packages missing signoffs
* 5 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (16 total) ==

* dsniff-2.4b1-21 (i686)
* exim-4.77-2 (i686)
* libgda3-3.1.5-11 (i686)
* librcc-0.2.6-5 (i686)
* perl-berkeleydb-0.50-2 (i686)
* poedit-1.4.6.1-6 (i686)
* python-bsddb-5.2.0-3 (i686)
* xemacs-21.5.31-4 (i686)
* dsniff-2.4b1-21 (x86_64)
* exim-4.77-2 (x86_64)
* libgda3-3.1.5-11 (x86_64)
* librcc-0.2.6-5 (x86_64)
* perl-berkeleydb-0.50-2 (x86_64)
* poedit-1.4.6.1-6 (x86_64)
* python-bsddb-5.2.0-3 (x86_64)
* xemacs-21.5.31-4 (x86_64)


== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (37 total) ==

* dsniff-2.4b1-21 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* exim-4.77-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* expac-0.07-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* fcron-3.0.6-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gogglesmm-0.12.6-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* libgda3-3.1.5-11 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* librcc-0.2.6-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* me-tv-2.0.1-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* ndiswrapper-1.57-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* openscenegraph-3.0.1-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* perl-berkeleydb-0.50-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* pkgtools-23-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* poedit-1.4.6.1-6 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* python-bsddb-5.2.0-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* xemacs-21.5.31-4 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* xfmedia-0.9.2-10 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* dsniff-2.4b1-21 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* exim-4.77-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* fcron-3.0.6-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* gogglesmm-0.12.6-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* libgda3-3.1.5-11 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* librcc-0.2.6-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* me-tv-2.0.1-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* ndiswrapper-1.57-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* openscenegraph-3.0.1-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* perl-berkeleydb-0.50-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* poedit-1.4.6.1-6 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* python-bsddb-5.2.0-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* xemacs-21.5.31-4 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* xfmedia-0.9.2-10 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) ==

* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (x86_64)
    1/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (4 total) ==

* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any)
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64)
* pkgtools-23-3 (x86_64)
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (x86_64)


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13
* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25
* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (i686), since 2011-12-23
* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (x86_64), since 2011-12-23


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. stephane - 8 signoffs
2. ttopper - 4 signoffs
3. dreisner - 4 signoffs


From yangtsesu at gmail.com  Wed Jan 11 00:13:02 2012
From: yangtsesu at gmail.com (Yangtse Su)
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:13:02 +0800
Subject: [aur-general] gstreamer-vaapi out of date
Message-ID: <1326258782.11808.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>

gstreamer-vaapi out of date,I have make a git version of this pkg.
But now,the git version do not works with gstreamer0.10 in the source.
For the users do not want to use too many aur packages but only need
gstreamse-vaapi,I think gstreamse-vaapi will be the best.
After all ,I will take gstreamer-vaapi.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120111/b510f3d0/attachment.asc>

From nobody at archlinux.org  Wed Jan 11 04:07:04 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:07:04 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120111090704.21034.82034@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 4 fully signed off packages
* 31 packages missing signoffs
* 5 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (29 total) ==

* dsniff-2.4b1-21 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* exim-4.77-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* expac-0.07-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* fcron-3.0.6-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* libgda3-3.1.5-11 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* librcc-0.2.6-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* ndiswrapper-1.57-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* perl-berkeleydb-0.50-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* pkgtools-23-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* poedit-1.4.6.1-6 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* python-bsddb-5.2.0-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* xemacs-21.5.31-4 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* dsniff-2.4b1-21 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* exim-4.77-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* fcron-3.0.6-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* libgda3-3.1.5-11 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* librcc-0.2.6-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* ndiswrapper-1.57-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* perl-berkeleydb-0.50-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* poedit-1.4.6.1-6 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* python-bsddb-5.2.0-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* xemacs-21.5.31-4 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) ==

* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (x86_64)
    1/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (4 total) ==

* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any)
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64)
* pkgtools-23-3 (x86_64)
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (x86_64)


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13
* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25
* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (i686), since 2011-12-23
* percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (x86_64), since 2011-12-23


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. tomegun - 11 signoffs
2. dan - 4 signoffs


From rodseth at gmail.com  Wed Jan 11 05:35:55 2012
From: rodseth at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alexander_R=F8dseth?=)
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:35:55 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] gstreamer-vaapi out of date
In-Reply-To: <1326258782.11808.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1326258782.11808.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <CAG7ayysGpAnbCk+5P=bDUKEn376sSx+Wkb55DRwfoA6HU-4VNA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Yes, we can probably disown gstreamer-vaapi, so that you can adopt it.
But, have you e-mailed the current maintainer (LukynZ) and waited 2 weeks first?

-- 
Best regards,
?Alexander R?dseth
?Arch Linux Trusted User
?(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

From rodseth at gmail.com  Wed Jan 11 06:40:13 2012
From: rodseth at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alexander_R=F8dseth?=)
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:40:13 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] warez in the AUR
In-Reply-To: <CAO0v=MOsYLsoP4A-Gm-Z=TkB9XyaMKeLGQkg_pHLbizfDSkdtw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAO0v=MNbTAsGGBCc-io5C63Bkx6Dz5yXKw=T2LLiDibLx6485w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAG7ayyuCxc46YmH5Vy_WYA_WfFt1dPg_-vMp--COTQXO6WBg6Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO0v=MOsYLsoP4A-Gm-Z=TkB9XyaMKeLGQkg_pHLbizfDSkdtw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAG7ayyvqdTg7WXsi6BXk+TRkE8ix_vr4=kQu1jr7QrJp-s4GwA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

I don't think the forum etiquette rules applies to AUR packages.
If I understand you correctly, the point is that it would be natural
to create rules for AUR that are within the same spirit as the forum
etiquette rules?
I can agree with this, but the forum etiquette rules are, IMO, unclear
on both the topic of abandonware and also on which laws for which
countries are "applicable".

Crafting a similar etiquette rule for AUR would surely spark several
lengthy discussions and should probably involve more than just one TU.

If you wish to push the issue further, I'm not sure where to go from
here. Perhaps a new forum thread?

-- 
Sincerely,
?Alexander R?dseth
?Arch Linux Trusted User
?(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

From karol.blazewicz at gmail.com  Wed Jan 11 06:50:58 2012
From: karol.blazewicz at gmail.com (Karol Blazewicz)
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:50:58 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] warez in the AUR
In-Reply-To: <CAG7ayyvqdTg7WXsi6BXk+TRkE8ix_vr4=kQu1jr7QrJp-s4GwA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAO0v=MNbTAsGGBCc-io5C63Bkx6Dz5yXKw=T2LLiDibLx6485w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAG7ayyuCxc46YmH5Vy_WYA_WfFt1dPg_-vMp--COTQXO6WBg6Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO0v=MOsYLsoP4A-Gm-Z=TkB9XyaMKeLGQkg_pHLbizfDSkdtw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAG7ayyvqdTg7WXsi6BXk+TRkE8ix_vr4=kQu1jr7QrJp-s4GwA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAO0v=MN5N_kONDawbGy0wKx4gfsMHyKpOUHS=GjrV9iBgr=5zw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Alexander R?dseth <rodseth at gmail.com> wrote:
> If you wish to push the issue further, I'm not sure where to go from
> here. Perhaps a new forum thread?

Nah, let's leave it as it is. Thanks for your work on this subject.
There's already a thread on the forums and a couple threads on the ML
+ a wiki discussion and Arch is not my personal project so I don't
want to force anyone into accepting my point of view.

From barthalion at gmail.com  Wed Jan 11 11:29:10 2012
From: barthalion at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QmFydMWCb21pZWogUGlvdHJvd3NraQ==?=)
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:29:10 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Cleanup request
In-Reply-To: <CAK6tggzvJ+zOLM2WfhyuuRRrLO=XULpMF9R0uwBZ5YjkiTpSUA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAK6tggzvJ+zOLM2WfhyuuRRrLO=XULpMF9R0uwBZ5YjkiTpSUA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F0DB8D6.8080200@gmail.com>

On 01/08/2012 12:11 PM, Luca Bennati wrote:
> This is the context:
> gle (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1863) is outdated and
> orphaned. I prepared a new PKGBUILD, but then I found those other packages
> on AUR:
> gle-graphics (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31267) also
> outdated but not orphaned
> gle4 (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12162) outdated, orphaned
> and a clear dup
> 
> Now, while it is clear that gle4 should be removed or at least merged, I
> would like to ask which package between gle and gle-graphics would be
> merged in the other.
> Upstream site names it 'GLE', but in some part of the tarball it's called
> 'gle-graphics'.
> What is the official stance?

I've merged gle4 botes with gle.
Gle-graphics doesn't seem to be out-of-date for me. Anyway, I would keep
it in AUR, if it isn't part of gle package.

-- 
Bart?omiej Piotrowski
Arch Linux Trusted User
http://archlinux.org/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120111/99d85c00/attachment.asc>

From barthalion at gmail.com  Wed Jan 11 11:50:30 2012
From: barthalion at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QmFydMWCb21pZWogUGlvdHJvd3NraQ==?=)
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:50:30 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [Removal Request] Multiple packages.
In-Reply-To: <CA+4o_oHeaxpR=aY4UwV3x2sNxGYWHyMG4TKA_9M7GnZ50vrUyA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+4o_oHeaxpR=aY4UwV3x2sNxGYWHyMG4TKA_9M7GnZ50vrUyA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F0DBDD6.4030406@gmail.com>

Removed: xmms-alarm
         iptlogger
         klipoquery
         ksystemlog
         bulldozer
         libcoaster
         gshrooms

Squidguard has better naming scheme than squidguard-1.4 If maintainer of
*-1.4 would like to take it, it will be great. (Of course I will merge
votes then.)

-- 
Bart?omiej Piotrowski
Arch Linux Trusted User
http://archlinux.org/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120111/adb032cd/attachment.asc>

From barthalion at gmail.com  Wed Jan 11 12:00:55 2012
From: barthalion at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QmFydMWCb21pZWogUGlvdHJvd3NraQ==?=)
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:00:55 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Rename/delete/orphan request
In-Reply-To: <CAK4rBJTU=3hGWPX9pBzo2_JngrV9r=qoUjZxjrf4h4+SED3MAA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAK4rBJQDj7=1cs3qqAYbyG6GwKOqExGS9zHaLG44u-afbX9cEA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK4rBJTU=3hGWPX9pBzo2_JngrV9r=qoUjZxjrf4h4+SED3MAA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F0DC047.5070808@gmail.com>

All (should be) done, thanks.

-- 
Bart?omiej Piotrowski
Arch Linux Trusted User
http://archlinux.org/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120111/c32d079f/attachment-0001.asc>

From lucak3 at gmail.com  Wed Jan 11 13:13:24 2012
From: lucak3 at gmail.com (Luca Bennati)
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:13:24 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Cleanup request
In-Reply-To: <4F0DB8D6.8080200@gmail.com>
References: <CAK6tggzvJ+zOLM2WfhyuuRRrLO=XULpMF9R0uwBZ5YjkiTpSUA@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F0DB8D6.8080200@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAK6tggywnQhNcHxFde_cOuv6uZMGAHHEG-=bsJKC5FStsUZW0g@mail.gmail.com>

2012/1/11 Bart?omiej Piotrowski <barthalion at gmail.com>

> On 01/08/2012 12:11 PM, Luca Bennati wrote:
> > This is the context:
> > gle (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1863) is outdated and
> > orphaned. I prepared a new PKGBUILD, but then I found those other
> packages
> > on AUR:
> > gle-graphics (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31267) also
> > outdated but not orphaned
> > gle4 (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12162) outdated,
> orphaned
> > and a clear dup
> >
> > Now, while it is clear that gle4 should be removed or at least merged, I
> > would like to ask which package between gle and gle-graphics would be
> > merged in the other.
> > Upstream site names it 'GLE', but in some part of the tarball it's called
> > 'gle-graphics'.
> > What is the official stance?
>
> I've merged gle4 botes with gle.
> Gle-graphics doesn't seem to be out-of-date for me. Anyway, I would keep
> it in AUR, if it isn't part of gle package.

Sorry, it seems I wasn't clear with my explanation: gle and gle-graphics
are the same project, I was asking which was considered the upstream name.
I guess you could just merge gle with gle-graphics and be done with it.

From stefanwilkens at gmail.com  Wed Jan 11 13:41:56 2012
From: stefanwilkens at gmail.com (Stefan Wilkens)
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:41:56 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [Removal Request] Multiple packages.
In-Reply-To: <4F0DBDD6.4030406@gmail.com>
References: <CA+4o_oHeaxpR=aY4UwV3x2sNxGYWHyMG4TKA_9M7GnZ50vrUyA@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F0DBDD6.4030406@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CA+4o_oHQi+znbQ0cBD3Qd=7Tvm5s59_TvGVB-ULswhUCNTusvg@mail.gmail.com>

2012/1/11 Bart?omiej Piotrowski <barthalion at gmail.com>:
> Removed: xmms-alarm
> ? ? ? ? iptlogger
> ? ? ? ? klipoquery
> ? ? ? ? ksystemlog
> ? ? ? ? bulldozer
> ? ? ? ? libcoaster
> ? ? ? ? gshrooms
>
> Squidguard has better naming scheme than squidguard-1.4 If maintainer of
> *-1.4 would like to take it, it will be great. (Of course I will merge
> votes then.)
>
> --
> Bart?omiej Piotrowski
> Arch Linux Trusted User
> http://archlinux.org/
>

I'll pass your suggestion on to squidguard's maintainer, thank so far Bart?omiej

From Sekereg at gmx.com  Wed Jan 11 14:51:14 2012
From: Sekereg at gmx.com (=?UTF-8?B?Sm9zw6kgUmFtw7NuIEdhcmPDrWE=?=)
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:51:14 -0600
Subject: [aur-general] Removal Request: libgpod-sharp-git
Message-ID: <4F0DE832.2050708@gmx.com>

Please remove libgpod-sharp-git[1], its orphaned and pulls from the same
source as libgpod-git[2].

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40252
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32393

From gostrc at gmail.com  Wed Jan 11 16:16:26 2012
From: gostrc at gmail.com (Thomas Dziedzic)
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:16:26 -0600
Subject: [aur-general] Removal Request: libgpod-sharp-git
In-Reply-To: <4F0DE832.2050708@gmx.com>
References: <4F0DE832.2050708@gmx.com>
Message-ID: <CANFDciFrbyKFHVXxp4RNK3xoA5XpY2=B=wU8-mVY_YKvModeVA@mail.gmail.com>

2012/1/11 Jos? Ram?n Garc?a <Sekereg at gmx.com>:
> Please remove libgpod-sharp-git[1], its orphaned and pulls from the same
> source as libgpod-git[2].
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40252
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32393

done

From pablo at glatelier.org  Wed Jan 11 18:56:03 2012
From: pablo at glatelier.org (Pablo Olmos de Aguilera C.)
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 20:56:03 -0300
Subject: [aur-general] New package: ttytter
Message-ID: <CAL9T76f4n6Vo3nD5cFOKaZjiMuneA4mUxPNDOLQfUuF9mXoPTQ@mail.gmail.com>

Well... this isn't new really... until a couple of weeks ago (prolly
less) there were an outdated version. I tried to communicate with the
maintainer, but he never answered. Now I found that the package
doesn't exist so I guess he must deleted it.

Anyway, I had the former package so I just updated it to the latest
version, and kept the previous contributors. Tell me if it's okay =).

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55743

Regards
-- 
Pablo Olmos de Aguilera Corradini - @PaBLoX
http://www.glatelier.org/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/pablooda/
Linux User: #456971 - http://counter.li.org/

From plewis at aur.archlinux.org  Wed Jan 11 18:59:35 2012
From: plewis at aur.archlinux.org (Peter Lewis)
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:59:35 +0000
Subject: [aur-general] New package: ttytter
In-Reply-To: <CAL9T76f4n6Vo3nD5cFOKaZjiMuneA4mUxPNDOLQfUuF9mXoPTQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL9T76f4n6Vo3nD5cFOKaZjiMuneA4mUxPNDOLQfUuF9mXoPTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1480888.gCqS8GnE2y@whiskers>

Hi Pablo,

On Wednesday 11 Jan 2012 20:56:03 Pablo Olmos de Aguilera C. wrote:
> Well... this isn't new really... until a couple of weeks ago (prolly
> less) there were an outdated version. I tried to communicate with the
> maintainer, but he never answered. Now I found that the package
> doesn't exist so I guess he must deleted it.

Actually, I moved it to [community] since it seemed popular :-)

I dropped a comment on the old AUR package before deleting it - didn't you 
receive the email? Sorry for the duplicate effort...

Pete.


From lists at baums-on-web.de  Wed Jan 11 19:51:46 2012
From: lists at baums-on-web.de (Heiko Baums)
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 01:51:46 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] New package: ttytter
In-Reply-To: <1480888.gCqS8GnE2y@whiskers>
References: <CAL9T76f4n6Vo3nD5cFOKaZjiMuneA4mUxPNDOLQfUuF9mXoPTQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <1480888.gCqS8GnE2y@whiskers>
Message-ID: <20120112015146.2ebc142a@darkstar>

Am Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:59:35 +0000
schrieb Peter Lewis <plewis at aur.archlinux.org>:

> Actually, I moved it to [community] since it seemed popular :-)

Then it would be an idea to removing it from AUR again. ;-)

Heiko

From l.jirkovsky at gmail.com  Thu Jan 12 01:54:19 2012
From: l.jirkovsky at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?THVrw6HFoSBKaXJrb3Zza8O9?=)
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 07:54:19 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] New package: ttytter
In-Reply-To: <20120112015146.2ebc142a@darkstar>
References: <CAL9T76f4n6Vo3nD5cFOKaZjiMuneA4mUxPNDOLQfUuF9mXoPTQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <1480888.gCqS8GnE2y@whiskers> <20120112015146.2ebc142a@darkstar>
Message-ID: <CAFa9FQs6WFAveUP+weA5A1c4r5UYh1bhJjhOCz7UW-EAfdx8-w@mail.gmail.com>

On 12 January 2012 01:51, Heiko Baums <lists at baums-on-web.de> wrote:
> Am Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:59:35 +0000
> schrieb Peter Lewis <plewis at aur.archlinux.org>:
>
>> Actually, I moved it to [community] since it seemed popular :-)
>
> Then it would be an idea to removing it from AUR again. ;-)
>
> Heiko

Done

From nobody at archlinux.org  Thu Jan 12 04:07:05 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:07:05 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120112090705.8222.92936@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 4 fully signed off packages
* 11 packages missing signoffs
* 3 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (11 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* ndiswrapper-1.57-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* pkgtools-23-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* ndiswrapper-1.57-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (4 total) ==

* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any)
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64)
* pkgtools-23-3 (x86_64)
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (x86_64)


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13
* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. ibiru - 7 signoffs
2. thomas - 6 signoffs
3. stativ - 2 signoffs
4. tomegun - 1 signoffs
5. pierre - 1 signoffs


From plewis at aur.archlinux.org  Thu Jan 12 05:03:05 2012
From: plewis at aur.archlinux.org (Peter Lewis)
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 10:03:05 +0000
Subject: [aur-general] New package: ttytter
In-Reply-To: <CAFa9FQs6WFAveUP+weA5A1c4r5UYh1bhJjhOCz7UW-EAfdx8-w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL9T76f4n6Vo3nD5cFOKaZjiMuneA4mUxPNDOLQfUuF9mXoPTQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120112015146.2ebc142a@darkstar>
 <CAFa9FQs6WFAveUP+weA5A1c4r5UYh1bhJjhOCz7UW-EAfdx8-w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1854949.G4RQFdbNPd@whiskers>

> >> Actually, I moved it to [community] since it seemed popular :-)
> > 
> > Then it would be an idea to removing it from AUR again. ;-)

Lol, sorry, I got distracted.

Thanks Lukas.

Pete.

From nicola at kernel-panic.dnsdojo.net  Thu Jan 12 07:47:15 2012
From: nicola at kernel-panic.dnsdojo.net (Nicola Bignami)
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:47:15 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request
Message-ID: <4F0ED653.8060907@kernel-panic.dnsdojo.net>

icecat-ka --- Orphan, outdated, no longer available upstream.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38420

icecat-oc --- Orphan, outdated, no longer available upstream.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38433

savekernel --- Orphan, outdated, no longer available upstream.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15004

skulltag-x86_64  --- Orphan, replaced by skulltag package that now 
supports also 64bit.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40360

From rodseth at gmail.com  Thu Jan 12 07:52:42 2012
From: rodseth at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alexander_R=F8dseth?=)
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:52:42 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request
In-Reply-To: <4F0ED653.8060907@kernel-panic.dnsdojo.net>
References: <4F0ED653.8060907@kernel-panic.dnsdojo.net>
Message-ID: <CAG7ayyvb4mBUKB0jHPTpLMpKnEXXuJ9ZyHu662-=dads0qtztg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Removed. Thank you.

-- 
Cordially,
?Alexander R?dseth
?Arch Linux Trusted User
?(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

From danielepaolella at email.it  Thu Jan 12 09:39:10 2012
From: danielepaolella at email.it (Daniele Paolella)
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:39:10 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: python-medusa
Message-ID: <4F0EF08E.6030401@email.it>

Please remove: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19970

* No more package depends on it;
* its home page is gone;
* last upstream release is 6 years old.

Thank you.

 
 
 --
 Caselle da 1GB, trasmetti allegati fino a 3GB e in piu' IMAP, POP3 e SMTP autenticato? GRATIS solo con Email.it http://www.email.it/f
 
 Sponsor:
 Vuoi arredare casa con stile? MisterCupido.com realizza perfette Riproduzioni d'Opere d'Arte! Scopri subito le nostre migliori proposte in offerta!
 Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=11451&d=12-1

From rodseth at gmail.com  Thu Jan 12 10:53:19 2012
From: rodseth at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alexander_R=F8dseth?=)
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:53:19 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: python-medusa
In-Reply-To: <4F0EF08E.6030401@email.it>
References: <4F0EF08E.6030401@email.it>
Message-ID: <CAG7ayys9YdDLN_JxZoTOD2QAh-d_HwtmGhDWqN=VWjm=ZwsHag@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Removed. Thank you.

-- 
Cordially,
?Alexander R?dseth
?Arch Linux Trusted User
?(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

From davorin.ucakar at gmail.com  Thu Jan 12 14:59:07 2012
From: davorin.ucakar at gmail.com (Davorin =?utf-8?B?VcSNYWthcg==?=)
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:59:07 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: xcursor-openzone-white
Message-ID: <12071502.3Jqvr38mrH@lumpy>

Hi,

please remove xcursor-openzone-white 
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29947) it has been merged into 
xcursor-openzone.

Davorin U?akar

From stefanwilkens at gmail.com  Thu Jan 12 15:12:21 2012
From: stefanwilkens at gmail.com (Stefan Wilkens)
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:12:21 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [Removal Request] Multiple packages
Message-ID: <CA+4o_oF2UKGovhqYn9yKfSZ9RfQDgYpXFQ3U0LKx0NWi99tarw@mail.gmail.com>

dug up a few more relics for the dustbin, please remove.

name: mb-desktop-xine
AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3757
reason: upstream 404, orphan

name: kpiqtorial
AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3906
reason: upstream development 0, depends on aRts for which we dropped
support in 2008 and doesn't compile when configured without arts.

name: list
AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=824
reason: source link 404, project 404.

name: podnova
AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3953
reason: source link 404, no alternative sources

name: fxsudoku
AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4053
reason: upstream 404, dev is an arch user but can't find any ref to
this on his new site.

name: kompile
AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4092
reason: upstream 404, domain gone

name: kooltime
AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4114
reason: upstream 404, new location of the domain does not contain the app.

name: kdeicons-kids
AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4270
reason: upstream 404

From gostrc at gmail.com  Thu Jan 12 15:20:42 2012
From: gostrc at gmail.com (Thomas Dziedzic)
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:20:42 -0600
Subject: [aur-general] [Removal Request] Multiple packages
In-Reply-To: <CA+4o_oF2UKGovhqYn9yKfSZ9RfQDgYpXFQ3U0LKx0NWi99tarw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+4o_oF2UKGovhqYn9yKfSZ9RfQDgYpXFQ3U0LKx0NWi99tarw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CANFDciFxLx367dV63j_+HNxLWtFwWvVA=7BN+G_s7miWXbePjg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Stefan Wilkens <stefanwilkens at gmail.com> wrote:
> dug up a few more relics for the dustbin, please remove.
>
> name: mb-desktop-xine
> AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3757
> reason: upstream 404, orphan
>
> name: kpiqtorial
> AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3906
> reason: upstream development 0, depends on aRts for which we dropped
> support in 2008 and doesn't compile when configured without arts.
>
> name: list
> AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=824
> reason: source link 404, project 404.
>
> name: podnova
> AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3953
> reason: source link 404, no alternative sources
>
> name: fxsudoku
> AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4053
> reason: upstream 404, dev is an arch user but can't find any ref to
> this on his new site.
>
> name: kompile
> AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4092
> reason: upstream 404, domain gone
>
> name: kooltime
> AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4114
> reason: upstream 404, new location of the domain does not contain the app.
>
> name: kdeicons-kids
> AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4270
> reason: upstream 404

all gone, thanks!

From ballogyor at gmail.com  Thu Jan 12 15:39:27 2012
From: ballogyor at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?B?QmFsbPMgR3n2cmd5?=)
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:39:27 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Rename/delete/orphan request
In-Reply-To: <4F0DC047.5070808@gmail.com>
References: <CAK4rBJQDj7=1cs3qqAYbyG6GwKOqExGS9zHaLG44u-afbX9cEA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK4rBJTU=3hGWPX9pBzo2_JngrV9r=qoUjZxjrf4h4+SED3MAA@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F0DC047.5070808@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAK4rBJS02AASZc2DF0VX-j6Af08DXunAqnHSGruYkRHp2pDmXA@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks, but my 2nd and 3rd requests (deleting alacarte-xfce-devel and
pan-gtk3, orphaning libindicator) are not done yet.

--
City-busz

2012/1/11 Bart?omiej Piotrowski <barthalion at gmail.com>:
> All (should be) done, thanks.
>
> --
> Bart?omiej Piotrowski
> Arch Linux Trusted User
> http://archlinux.org/
>

From pablo at glatelier.org  Thu Jan 12 17:00:26 2012
From: pablo at glatelier.org (Pablo Olmos de Aguilera C.)
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:00:26 -0300
Subject: [aur-general] New package: ttytter
Message-ID: <CAL9T76dH_x3kYbnYvfH2qfcJCe==VO0tBAbAQ41bZdkxUP_Ffw@mail.gmail.com>

On 12 January 2012 07:03,  <aur-general-request at archlinux.org> wrote:
> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 10:03:05 +0000
> From: Peter Lewis <plewis at aur.archlinux.org>
> To: aur-general at archlinux.org
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] New package: ttytter
> Message-ID: <1854949.G4RQFdbNPd at whiskers>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>> >> Actually, I moved it to [community] since it seemed popular :-)
>> >
>> > Then it would be an idea to removing it from AUR again. ;-)
>
> Lol, sorry, I got distracted.
>
> Thanks Lukas.

Lol, I didn't see any comment (weird), I didnit see anything else
either on the aur list, of course I never though that was the reason
(specially because the maintainer wasn't answering).

Next time I'm gonna look there too =P, sorry!

Regards,
-- 
Pablo Olmos de Aguilera Corradini - @PaBLoX
http://www.glatelier.org/
http://friendfeed.com/pablox/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/pablooda/
Linux User: #456971 - http://counter.li.org/

From barthalion at gmail.com  Fri Jan 13 01:28:42 2012
From: barthalion at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Bart=B3omiej_Piotrowski?=)
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 07:28:42 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Rename/delete/orphan request
In-Reply-To: <CAK4rBJS02AASZc2DF0VX-j6Af08DXunAqnHSGruYkRHp2pDmXA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAK4rBJQDj7=1cs3qqAYbyG6GwKOqExGS9zHaLG44u-afbX9cEA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK4rBJTU=3hGWPX9pBzo2_JngrV9r=qoUjZxjrf4h4+SED3MAA@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F0DC047.5070808@gmail.com>
 <CAK4rBJS02AASZc2DF0VX-j6Af08DXunAqnHSGruYkRHp2pDmXA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F0FCF1A.9060300@gmail.com>

On 01/12/2012 09:39 PM, Ball? Gy?rgy wrote:
> Thanks, but my 2nd and 3rd requests (deleting alacarte-xfce-devel and
> pan-gtk3, orphaning libindicator) are not done yet.

And done now, sorry.

-- 
Bart?omiej Piotrowski
Arch Linux Trusted User
http://archlinux.org/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120113/a7b4a692/attachment-0001.asc>

From drcouzelis at gmail.com  Fri Jan 13 02:12:31 2012
From: drcouzelis at gmail.com (David Rawson Couzelis)
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 02:12:31 -0500
Subject: [aur-general] [Deletion request] enbudget
Message-ID: <4F0FD95F.9070508@gmail.com>

Please delete the "enbudget" AUR package.

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47010

The application has been renamed "divvyup". A new AUR package has been 
created with the new name. I am both the maintainer of the AUR package 
and the author of the application.

Thank you.

From jelle at vdwaa.nl  Fri Jan 13 03:30:30 2012
From: jelle at vdwaa.nl (Jelle van der Waa)
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 09:30:30 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: xcursor-openzone-white
In-Reply-To: <12071502.3Jqvr38mrH@lumpy>
References: <12071502.3Jqvr38mrH@lumpy>
Message-ID: <4F0FEBA6.1010002@vdwaa.nl>

On 12/01/12 20:59, Davorin U?akar wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> please remove xcursor-openzone-white 
> (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29947) it has been merged into 
> xcursor-openzone.
> 
> Davorin U?akar

Removed, thanks!

-- 
Jelle van der Waa

From plewis at aur.archlinux.org  Fri Jan 13 03:35:36 2012
From: plewis at aur.archlinux.org (Peter Lewis)
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 08:35:36 +0000
Subject: [aur-general] [Deletion request] enbudget
In-Reply-To: <4F0FD95F.9070508@gmail.com>
References: <4F0FD95F.9070508@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3972595.0Tp94BAnrz@whiskers>

On Friday 13 Jan 2012 02:12:31 David Rawson Couzelis wrote:
> Please delete the "enbudget" AUR package.
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47010
> 
> The application has been renamed "divvyup". A new AUR package has been
> created with the new name. I am both the maintainer of the AUR package
> and the author of the application.

Thanks. I merged enbudget into divvyup.

Pete.

From nobody at archlinux.org  Fri Jan 13 04:07:04 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 09:07:04 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120113090704.21910.73405@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 2 packages not accepting signoffs
* 4 fully signed off packages
* 9 packages missing signoffs
* 3 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (9 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* pkgtools-23-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (4 total) ==

* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any)
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64)
* pkgtools-23-3 (x86_64)
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (x86_64)


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13
* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. tomegun - 2 signoffs


From ebrodeur at ujami.net  Fri Jan 13 06:01:52 2012
From: ebrodeur at ujami.net (Ernie Brodeur)
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 03:01:52 -0800
Subject: [aur-general] [orphan request] charles 3.6.3-1
Message-ID: <CABKx6omy=FZHaxL2uykNxOFygQfNCV1-j-nOz=kvfYvQ1LcG5A@mail.gmail.com>

Hello!

The package charles-3.6.3-1  has been flagged out of date since nov 30th.
 I would like to adopt it, is it possible to get it disowned?

- Ernie Brodeur

From plewis at aur.archlinux.org  Fri Jan 13 08:04:12 2012
From: plewis at aur.archlinux.org (Peter Lewis)
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:04:12 +0000
Subject: [aur-general] [orphan request] charles 3.6.3-1
In-Reply-To: <CABKx6omy=FZHaxL2uykNxOFygQfNCV1-j-nOz=kvfYvQ1LcG5A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABKx6omy=FZHaxL2uykNxOFygQfNCV1-j-nOz=kvfYvQ1LcG5A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <2800175.799z3PTbux@puddleduck>

Hi, 

On Friday 13 Jan 2012 03:01:52 Ernie Brodeur wrote:
> The package charles-3.6.3-1  has been flagged out of date since nov 30th.
>  I would like to adopt it, is it possible to get it disowned?

Please send an email to the maintainer first, asking them to update it, or if 
you can take over. If you don't receive a reply within a reasonable amount of 
time (e.g. two weeks), please come back to us with a request.

Thanks,

Pete.

From ebrodeur at ujami.net  Sat Jan 14 01:31:12 2012
From: ebrodeur at ujami.net (Ernie Brodeur)
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:31:12 -0800
Subject: [aur-general] [orphan request] charles 3.6.3-1
In-Reply-To: <2800175.799z3PTbux@puddleduck>
References: <CABKx6omy=FZHaxL2uykNxOFygQfNCV1-j-nOz=kvfYvQ1LcG5A@mail.gmail.com>
 <2800175.799z3PTbux@puddleduck>
Message-ID: <CABKx6on5K_FcVc76BeweRLbGPtu3-NCuUbWr=+wndhemiRc5-A@mail.gmail.com>

So, the 45 days that lapsed since it's been flagged out of date isn't
enough?

Seems to me after 6 weeks, why bother?

If not 6 weeks, what reasonable amount of time makes this step unnecessary?

I want to fix the package, not deal with waiting on somebody else who may
or may not get to it for another two weeks.

Just a thought.

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Peter Lewis <plewis at aur.archlinux.org>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Friday 13 Jan 2012 03:01:52 Ernie Brodeur wrote:
> > The package charles-3.6.3-1  has been flagged out of date since nov 30th.
> >  I would like to adopt it, is it possible to get it disowned?
>
> Please send an email to the maintainer first, asking them to update it, or
> if
> you can take over. If you don't receive a reply within a reasonable amount
> of
> time (e.g. two weeks), please come back to us with a request.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Pete.
>

From nobody at archlinux.org  Sat Jan 14 04:07:04 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 09:07:04 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120114090704.26909.47953@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 2 packages not accepting signoffs
* 4 fully signed off packages
* 9 packages missing signoffs
* 3 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (9 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* pkgtools-23-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (4 total) ==

* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any)
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64)
* pkgtools-23-3 (x86_64)
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (x86_64)


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13
* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. tomegun - 8 signoffs
2. thomas - 5 signoffs
3. ibiru - 4 signoffs
4. foutrelis - 3 signoffs
5. stativ - 1 signoffs


From nicola at kernel-panic.dnsdojo.net  Sat Jan 14 04:25:44 2012
From: nicola at kernel-panic.dnsdojo.net (Nicola Bignami)
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:25:44 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [orphan request] charles 3.6.3-1
In-Reply-To: <CABKx6on5K_FcVc76BeweRLbGPtu3-NCuUbWr=+wndhemiRc5-A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABKx6omy=FZHaxL2uykNxOFygQfNCV1-j-nOz=kvfYvQ1LcG5A@mail.gmail.com>
 <2800175.799z3PTbux@puddleduck>
 <CABKx6on5K_FcVc76BeweRLbGPtu3-NCuUbWr=+wndhemiRc5-A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F114A18.7030508@kernel-panic.dnsdojo.net>

Il 14/01/2012 07:31, Ernie Brodeur ha scritto:
> So, the 45 days that lapsed since it's been flagged out of date isn't
> enough?
>
> Seems to me after 6 weeks, why bother?

Because it's the standard procedure and, beside this, it's unfair to 
disown a package without trying to contact its maintainer first.

> If not 6 weeks, what reasonable amount of time makes this step unnecessary?
>
> I want to fix the package, not deal with waiting on somebody else who may
> or may not get to it for another two weeks.

Maybe the maintainer itself may disown the package as soon you'll get in 
touch with him, so there's no need for a TU to disown it.
Maybe the the maintainer will provide the update.
Or maybe there will be silence for two weeks and a TU will disown the 
package.

In any case, IMHO this is a fair procedure to get a package disowned and 
is good to stick with it.

From thomas_weissschuh at lavabit.com  Sat Jan 14 06:46:13 2012
From: thomas_weissschuh at lavabit.com (Thomas =?utf-8?Q?Wei=C3=9Fschuh?=)
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 11:46:13 +0000
Subject: [aur-general] [deletion request] realpath
Message-ID: <TAHWOTBXTplxqAj@t-8ch.de>

Please delete the package realpath [0] from AUR.
Coreutils now provides realpath.

Regards

[0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5698


From archlinux at cryptocrack.de  Sat Jan 14 07:35:39 2012
From: archlinux at cryptocrack.de (Lukas Fleischer)
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 13:35:39 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [deletion request] realpath
In-Reply-To: <TAHWOTBXTplxqAj@t-8ch.de>
References: <TAHWOTBXTplxqAj@t-8ch.de>
Message-ID: <20120114123539.GA20061@blizzard>

On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:46:13AM +0000, Thomas Wei?schuh wrote:
> Please delete the package realpath [0] from AUR.
> Coreutils now provides realpath.

Done. Thanks for reporting!

> 
> Regards
> 
> [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5698

From mysatyre at gmail.com  Sat Jan 14 09:32:11 2012
From: mysatyre at gmail.com (Martti =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=FChne?=)
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 15:32:11 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [orphan request] charles 3.6.3-1
In-Reply-To: <4F114A18.7030508@kernel-panic.dnsdojo.net>
References: <CABKx6omy=FZHaxL2uykNxOFygQfNCV1-j-nOz=kvfYvQ1LcG5A@mail.gmail.com>
 <2800175.799z3PTbux@puddleduck>
 <CABKx6on5K_FcVc76BeweRLbGPtu3-NCuUbWr=+wndhemiRc5-A@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F114A18.7030508@kernel-panic.dnsdojo.net>
Message-ID: <20120114143211.GB5963@deepthought>

On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 10:25:44AM +0100, Nicola Bignami wrote:
> Il 14/01/2012 07:31, Ernie Brodeur ha scritto:
> >So, the 45 days that lapsed since it's been flagged out of date isn't
> >enough?
> >

...because you can't tell if the maintainer has notification activated.
since, as a maintainer, you're not required to have.

cheers!
mar77i

From stefanwilkens at gmail.com  Sat Jan 14 12:43:25 2012
From: stefanwilkens at gmail.com (Stefan Wilkens)
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:43:25 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [Removal Request] Multiple Packages
Message-ID: <CA+4o_oGSA7u=_hj8i-5mr9pJBZe03PY+rZt4MLTi3d6N0b4U1A@mail.gmail.com>

name: khddledapplet
AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5412
reason: link 404, applet intended for kicker (KDE3's taskbar) which
doesn't have upstream's support

name: gourmet-devel
AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2755
reason: surpassed by gourmet-dev
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36517)

name: kcometen3
AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3895
reason: upstream 404, depends on kde 3.5.x, surpassed by kcometen4
(qt4 port of kcometen3)
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19254

name: metacity-theme-microgui
AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5812
reason: upstream project 404

name: kdbus
AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5498
reason: project upstream 404, depends on kde 3.x. Was dropped from
other distros with this same reason.

name: gizmo5
AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19387
reason: google ate[1] gizmo5, upstream 404

name: libsipphoneapi-oss
AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6186
reason: library for gizmo5, also eaten by google

name: sidesms
AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5444
reason: project vanished from upstream domain



[1] http://googlevoiceblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/google-welcomes-gizmo5.html

From kfgz at interia.pl  Sat Jan 14 12:55:49 2012
From: kfgz at interia.pl (Krzysztof Grygiencz)
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:55:49 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [Removal request]  bin32-dmd
Message-ID: <4F11C1A5.7000009@interia.pl>

Hi,

Please delete my package [1] bin32-dmd because dmd in [community] has 
64-bit support as of 1.072.

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55407


Regards,
Krzysztof Grygiencz (kfgz)

From kfgz at interia.pl  Sat Jan 14 12:59:35 2012
From: kfgz at interia.pl (Krzysztof Grygiencz)
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:59:35 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [Removal request]  bin32-dmd
In-Reply-To: <4F11C1A5.7000009@interia.pl>
References: <4F11C1A5.7000009@interia.pl>
Message-ID: <4F11C287.7020308@interia.pl>

> Hi,
>
> Please delete my package [1] bin32-dmd because dmd in [community] has
> 64-bit support as of 1.072.
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55407
>
>
> Regards,
> Krzysztof Grygiencz (kfgz)

Please also delete lib32-libphobos because it depends on bin32-dmd.

From graysky at archlinux.us  Sat Jan 14 13:26:42 2012
From: graysky at archlinux.us (member graysky)
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 13:26:42 -0500
Subject: [aur-general] removal request
Message-ID: <CAO_nJAYjeUwNgmuPshS+Cg=7+Xf6KDJ5CraMvJaHBr0=CMeSHA@mail.gmail.com>

Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55793
I mistakenly duplicated another package in the AUR thinking that it
installed a pre-compiled bin; I wanted a from source package but I see now
that I was mistaken.

From graysky at archlinux.us  Sat Jan 14 15:58:28 2012
From: graysky at archlinux.us (member graysky)
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 15:58:28 -0500
Subject: [aur-general] [removal request] - delaboratory-source
Message-ID: <CAO_nJAbH--afu+TKAJO7CPYUAC9P8njyeSYrPMQdsxT0651+bQ@mail.gmail.com>

Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55793
I mistakenly duplicated another package in the AUR thinking that it
installed a pre-compiled bin; I wanted a from source package but I see now
that I was mistaken.

From seblu at seblu.net  Sat Jan 14 16:26:11 2012
From: seblu at seblu.net (Seblu)
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:26:11 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [removal request] - delaboratory-source
In-Reply-To: <CAO_nJAbH--afu+TKAJO7CPYUAC9P8njyeSYrPMQdsxT0651+bQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAO_nJAbH--afu+TKAJO7CPYUAC9P8njyeSYrPMQdsxT0651+bQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJSTwE7mVPjqtqtN8bgV5051FZyhMDMFcFMcYywPO6RJ67Z_AQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 9:58 PM, member graysky <graysky at archlinux.us> wrote:
> Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55793
> I mistakenly duplicated another package in the AUR thinking that it
> installed a pre-compiled bin; I wanted a from source package but I see now
> that I was mistaken.
done.


-- 
S?bastien Luttringer
www.seblu.net

From atsutane at freethoughts.de  Sat Jan 14 16:31:34 2012
From: atsutane at freethoughts.de (Thorsten =?ISO-8859-1?B?VPZwcGVy?=)
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:31:34 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [Removal Request] Multiple Packages
In-Reply-To: <CA+4o_oGSA7u=_hj8i-5mr9pJBZe03PY+rZt4MLTi3d6N0b4U1A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+4o_oGSA7u=_hj8i-5mr9pJBZe03PY+rZt4MLTi3d6N0b4U1A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120114223134.47e397e0@hell>

On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:43:25 +0100
Stefan Wilkens <stefanwilkens at gmail.com> wrote:

> name: khddledapplet
> AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5412
> reason: link 404, applet intended for kicker (KDE3's taskbar) which
> doesn't have upstream's support
> 
> name: gourmet-devel
> AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2755
> reason: surpassed by gourmet-dev
> (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36517)
> 
> name: kcometen3
> AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3895
> reason: upstream 404, depends on kde 3.5.x, surpassed by kcometen4
> (qt4 port of kcometen3)
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19254
> 
> name: metacity-theme-microgui
> AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5812
> reason: upstream project 404
> 
> name: kdbus
> AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5498
> reason: project upstream 404, depends on kde 3.x. Was dropped from
> other distros with this same reason.
> 
> name: gizmo5
> AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19387
> reason: google ate[1] gizmo5, upstream 404
> 
> name: libsipphoneapi-oss
> AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6186
> reason: library for gizmo5, also eaten by google
> 
> name: sidesms
> AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5444
> reason: project vanished from upstream domain
> 
> 
> 
> [1]
> http://googlevoiceblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/google-welcomes-gizmo5.html

Done, thank you.

-- 
Jabber: atsutane at freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/
Key: 295AFBF4     FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 222 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120114/6efde84d/attachment.asc>

From rodseth at gmail.com  Sat Jan 14 17:05:00 2012
From: rodseth at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alexander_R=F8dseth?=)
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 23:05:00 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [Removal request] bin32-dmd
In-Reply-To: <4F11C287.7020308@interia.pl>
References: <4F11C1A5.7000009@interia.pl> <4F11C287.7020308@interia.pl>
Message-ID: <CAG7ayyvsLQShmcPaC5vx=ZCG=PiF5FW394cf3A9a+P3qSC83PQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Removed. Thank you.

-- 
Cordially,
?Alexander R?dseth
?Arch Linux Trusted User
?(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

From archaios at archaios.net  Sat Jan 14 20:23:24 2012
From: archaios at archaios.net (David McIlwraith)
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 12:23:24 +1100
Subject: [aur-general] In re: crossfire-client compilation
In-Reply-To: <CAO9=JLyy4tUo82QXVzyWYxNtsz-6msS4c_g=dDNGst-SQnZgEQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAO9=JLyy4tUo82QXVzyWYxNtsz-6msS4c_g=dDNGst-SQnZgEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAO9=JLxrNudY+DZn_-M8+fbs8+1Vc3P2-craUmydwFZSehSseg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi there,

As far as I am aware: this is a bug / problem not related to the
package, but rather to the latest version of ld (possibly the multilib
version only? -- noting that it is not the optional rewrite in
binutils, gold); I have noted the same issue in bootstrapping gcc
(libstdc++.so being ignored) in OpenWRT compilation, as have several
others, having done a quick Google the other day.

Regards,
- Mr. David McIlwraith, MIEEE, MAPESMA <archaios at archaios.net>

From nobody at archlinux.org  Sun Jan 15 04:07:03 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 09:07:03 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120115090703.28159.87413@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 6 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 4 fully signed off packages
* 15 packages missing signoffs
* 3 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) ==

* balsa-2.4.11-1 (i686)
* ndiswrapper-1.57-5 (i686)
* pinot-0.98-2 (i686)
* balsa-2.4.11-1 (x86_64)
* ndiswrapper-1.57-5 (x86_64)
* pinot-0.98-2 (x86_64)


== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (15 total) ==

* balsa-2.4.11-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* expac-0.07-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* ndiswrapper-1.57-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* pinot-0.98-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* pkgtools-23-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* balsa-2.4.11-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* ndiswrapper-1.57-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* pinot-0.98-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (4 total) ==

* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any)
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64)
* pkgtools-23-3 (x86_64)
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (x86_64)


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13
* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. eric - 13 signoffs
2. remy - 6 signoffs
3. ttopper - 2 signoffs


From kfgz at interia.pl  Sun Jan 15 08:53:57 2012
From: kfgz at interia.pl (Krzysztof Grygiencz)
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 14:53:57 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [Removal request] metslib-newest
Message-ID: <4F12DA75.7000506@interia.pl>

Hi,

Please delete my package [1] metslib-newest because I'll update metslib 
to stable branch (0.5) and nuke 0.4 (buggy branch).

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43739


Regards,
Krzysztof Grygiencz (kfgz)

From sh at lutzhaase.com  Sun Jan 15 09:08:07 2012
From: sh at lutzhaase.com (Sven-Hendrik Haase)
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 15:08:07 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [Removal request] metslib-newest
In-Reply-To: <4F12DA75.7000506@interia.pl>
References: <4F12DA75.7000506@interia.pl>
Message-ID: <4F12DDC7.9040301@lutzhaase.com>

On 01/15/2012 02:53 PM, Krzysztof Grygiencz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please delete my package [1] metslib-newest because I'll update
> metslib to stable branch (0.5) and nuke 0.4 (buggy branch).
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43739
>
>
> Regards,
> Krzysztof Grygiencz (kfgz)
Nuked from orbit.

From graysky at archlinux.us  Sun Jan 15 10:12:28 2012
From: graysky at archlinux.us (member graysky)
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 10:12:28 -0500
Subject: [aur-general] [removal request] - ttf-droid-mono-slashed
Message-ID: <CAO_nJAb+rxjM8xBga_MW6Ff8r82GBWwc+xxDY_8ZpAzmGq_ciw@mail.gmail.com>

This package is duplicated in the more popular and
maintained ttf-droid-monovar.  Therefore, please remove
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40418

From flocke at shadowice.org  Mon Jan 16 02:37:05 2012
From: flocke at shadowice.org (Jakob Nixdorf)
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:37:05 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Removal Request (perl-image-exiftool)
Message-ID: <20120116073704.GA16136@toybox>

Hi,

could someone remove the package 'perl-image-exiftool' [1] from the AUR?
It's the same package as 'perl-exiftool' in [extra].

Thanks,
Jakob

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48076

-- 
Mail:		flocke at shadowice.org
Jabber:		flocke at shadowice.org
PGP: 		0654C07F (hkp://pgp.mit.edu:11371)
Web: 		http://shadowice.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120116/c17793e3/attachment.asc>

From bluewind at xinu.at  Mon Jan 16 02:44:34 2012
From: bluewind at xinu.at (Florian Pritz)
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:44:34 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Removal Request (perl-image-exiftool)
In-Reply-To: <20120116073704.GA16136@toybox>
References: <20120116073704.GA16136@toybox>
Message-ID: <4F13D562.8020605@xinu.at>

On 16.01.2012 08:37, Jakob Nixdorf wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> could someone remove the package 'perl-image-exiftool' [1] from the AUR?
> It's the same package as 'perl-exiftool' in [extra].
> 
> Thanks,
> Jakob
> 
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48076
> 

Removed, thank you.

-- 
Florian Pritz

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120116/0a7658fb/attachment.asc>

From barthalion at gmail.com  Mon Jan 16 03:46:14 2012
From: barthalion at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QmFydMWCb21pZWogUGlvdHJvd3NraQ==?=)
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:46:14 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [removal request] - ttf-droid-mono-slashed
In-Reply-To: <CAO_nJAb+rxjM8xBga_MW6Ff8r82GBWwc+xxDY_8ZpAzmGq_ciw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAO_nJAb+rxjM8xBga_MW6Ff8r82GBWwc+xxDY_8ZpAzmGq_ciw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F13E3D6.6070804@gmail.com>

Done.

-- 
Bart?omiej Piotrowski
Arch Linux Trusted User
http://archlinux.org/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120116/e74fc49f/attachment.asc>

From nobody at archlinux.org  Mon Jan 16 04:07:04 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:07:04 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120116090704.17324.53232@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 3 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 4 fully signed off packages
* 18 packages missing signoffs
* 3 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (3 total) ==

* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686)
* lilypond-2.14.2-4 (i686)
* libzdb-2.10-1 (i686)


== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) ==

* balsa-2.4.11-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* expac-0.07-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* lilypond-2.14.2-4 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* ndiswrapper-1.57-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* pinot-0.98-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* pkgtools-23-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* balsa-2.4.11-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* ndiswrapper-1.57-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* pinot-0.98-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (1 total) ==

* libzdb-2.10-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (4 total) ==

* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any)
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64)
* pkgtools-23-3 (x86_64)
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (x86_64)


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) ==

* expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13
* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. andyrtr - 4 signoffs
2. thomas - 1 signoffs


From manu at mindslicer.com  Mon Jan 16 12:09:34 2012
From: manu at mindslicer.com (Manu)
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:09:34 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: ruby-postgres
Message-ID: <CAOJBeDeYFcAxLL_nyoSqAt8PThdCd-9ewCvXBqB+zyp8e8RMVg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,.

Please remove ruby-postgres [1] from AUR. It is now packaged as a gem, and
apparently the name has changed to ruby-pg. I uploaded the new PKGBUILD
here [2].

Cheers,
Manu

[1]* *https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19735
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55848

From superbobry at gmail.com  Mon Jan 16 12:35:30 2012
From: superbobry at gmail.com (Sergei Lebedev)
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:35:30 +0400
Subject: [aur-general] Disown request for `menhir`
In-Reply-To: <CAFQn-381Umh3K2Pt0iqYzVH0VqAH=1tYbhwTD0Fvduw5LQK0_g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFQn-381Umh3K2Pt0iqYzVH0VqAH=1tYbhwTD0Fvduw5LQK0_g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAFQn-39GePPJAQCg_gkLSQzSPEUtNg64bxgapBV=yuPzDa2y+w@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

About a week ago I've emailed the maintainer of `menhir` [*], but received
no response. So, is it possible to disown the package now?

* It has been flagged as OOD since October
* the maintainer seems to ignore the comments completely.

Thanks,
Sergei

[*] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15726

From d at falconindy.com  Mon Jan 16 13:02:31 2012
From: d at falconindy.com (Dave Reisner)
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:02:31 -0500
Subject: [aur-general] Disown request for `menhir`
In-Reply-To: <CAFQn-39GePPJAQCg_gkLSQzSPEUtNg64bxgapBV=yuPzDa2y+w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFQn-381Umh3K2Pt0iqYzVH0VqAH=1tYbhwTD0Fvduw5LQK0_g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFQn-39GePPJAQCg_gkLSQzSPEUtNg64bxgapBV=yuPzDa2y+w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120116180231.GC563@rampage>

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 09:35:30PM +0400, Sergei Lebedev wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> About a week ago I've emailed the maintainer of `menhir` [*], but received
> no response. So, is it possible to disown the package now?
> 
> * It has been flagged as OOD since October
> * the maintainer seems to ignore the comments completely.
> 
> Thanks,
> Sergei
> 
> [*] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15726

Disowned.

d

From gostrc at gmail.com  Mon Jan 16 15:00:49 2012
From: gostrc at gmail.com (Thomas Dziedzic)
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:00:49 -0600
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: ruby-postgres
In-Reply-To: <CAOJBeDeYFcAxLL_nyoSqAt8PThdCd-9ewCvXBqB+zyp8e8RMVg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOJBeDeYFcAxLL_nyoSqAt8PThdCd-9ewCvXBqB+zyp8e8RMVg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CANFDciEWODAOEGz9U7Z3mqiteE=EfeBNP=BnzRPwz4014pmzOA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Manu <manu at mindslicer.com> wrote:
> Hi,.
>
> Please remove ruby-postgres [1] from AUR. It is now packaged as a gem, and
> apparently the name has changed to ruby-pg. I uploaded the new PKGBUILD
> here [2].
>
> Cheers,
> Manu
>
> [1]* *https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19735
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55848

done

From nobody at archlinux.org  Tue Jan 17 04:07:04 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 09:07:04 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120117090704.30741.59690@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 1 new package in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 1 fully signed off package
* 7 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) ==

* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64)


== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (7 total) ==

* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* ndiswrapper-1.57-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* ndiswrapper-1.57-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (1 total) ==

* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (x86_64)


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. bisson - 4 signoffs
2. allan - 4 signoffs
3. tomegun - 1 signoffs


From adaptee at gmail.com  Tue Jan 17 05:09:59 2012
From: adaptee at gmail.com (Jekyll Wu)
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:09:59 +0800
Subject: [aur-general] Rename/Merge request: oxygen-gtk-git ==>
	oxygen-gtk2-git
Message-ID: <4F1548F7.1020702@gmail.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Since extra/oxygen-gtk has renamed to extra/oxygen-gtk2. the
corresponding devel package oxygen-gtk-git[1] (currently maintained by
me)on AUR should follow.

I have created another package oxygen-gtk2-git[1]. Please merge the
comments and votes.

[1]  https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43581
[2]  https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55867
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPFUj3AAoJEOemZ9znWXlApOwQAJl1+3pOk4T6g9W7Lj0gu8rA
L6OF+r3xXah5ky32Vtfmj5dK4MEq2qbb+A+hH4kLmACtOWcVPbFChSge0q4UE5q5
5r0p6ecTRvhFy/XcC4+I83eeitgfzSBbtDnroc68u+0U+yE27SURmaFF0gu7nTZ8
z1D2uEfABUw9w/ITqGa3vJD5L0J8mmiPfbVR+GUuXRq+5RikI0NTXQzOiXC6gFhW
bJdtVc8+14gpgw2iTrDS4sDXTZoJc7/R1RB62SqOROZ63WB8jqofs9hAgZ+EXjma
5Xn+YwyWtLuNm3I+i6K9LzaaAfx+KZsLFZZJrKNJEvxIx0BZv2F46l4j0bKhayyh
A71ZLrIJ2X8+Yd+TmHNsx+xP07yTClbCZOvy0Zz8S7fNe/eiSWAcS1PypnmrxfOC
WjgxlXBXIh7gLgnGePKtR2cTcpUCkqWW/lgg4NPskhs+IlB/xo9QBV5ec1aqyR2r
oj2EYzrOVSPe7an7PsgOk1IqzE/cuSkx+O6EBauv2RQ+bWB+hIZfTFKBMvQWKEfH
IXgKWiNZDxc8jyng93K5XEcQ1NU6Jbx1OlHDwf3OYfbIRwxFOSWttDB5kzp5QpA0
uREEW00ieFNDA619H5UJCsFmyTweBZqWSY1Wmvd5Wi9ZlisskbDkL+g7D55rhxRt
fhBzCXU57tJAvQxbHbQO
=jjIJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

From rodseth at gmail.com  Tue Jan 17 06:18:37 2012
From: rodseth at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alexander_R=F8dseth?=)
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:18:37 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Rename/Merge request: oxygen-gtk-git ==>
	oxygen-gtk2-git
In-Reply-To: <4F1548F7.1020702@gmail.com>
References: <4F1548F7.1020702@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAG7ayyuHhMd3QKS9B4Wqi3z+ZJOeV4R=mabXmqL2yrLHqipeig@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Merged.

-- 
Best regards,
?Alexander R?dseth
?Arch Linux Trusted User
?(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

From hyacinthe.cartiaux at free.fr  Tue Jan 17 15:11:23 2012
From: hyacinthe.cartiaux at free.fr (Hyacinthe Cartiaux)
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:11:23 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Merge and removal request
Message-ID: <CA+9Su8RzEM7OaN=u7QGtaPY3GMb0vsqqcj5Lm+g=pwBxzu5jFw@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

oxygen-gtk package has been renamed oxygen-gtk2 (in order to avoid
confusion with oxygen-gtk3).
In the same way, I have created a new package lib32-oxygen-gtk2.
Now, I would like to merge votes and comments with the old package
lib32-oxygen-gtk, and delete it from AUR.

Is it possible ?

Thanks for your time ;)

-- 
Hyacinthe

From jakob.gruber at gmail.com  Tue Jan 17 15:19:26 2012
From: jakob.gruber at gmail.com (Jakob Gruber)
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:19:26 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Merge and removal request
In-Reply-To: <CA+9Su8RzEM7OaN=u7QGtaPY3GMb0vsqqcj5Lm+g=pwBxzu5jFw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+9Su8RzEM7OaN=u7QGtaPY3GMb0vsqqcj5Lm+g=pwBxzu5jFw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F15D7CE.10901@gmail.com>

On 01/17/2012 09:11 PM, Hyacinthe Cartiaux wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> oxygen-gtk package has been renamed oxygen-gtk2 (in order to avoid
> confusion with oxygen-gtk3).
> In the same way, I have created a new package lib32-oxygen-gtk2.
> Now, I would like to merge votes and comments with the old package
> lib32-oxygen-gtk, and delete it from AUR.
> 
> Is it possible ?
> 
> Thanks for your time ;)
> 

done!

From superbobry at gmail.com  Tue Jan 17 15:43:44 2012
From: superbobry at gmail.com (Sergei Lebedev)
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:43:44 +0400
Subject: [aur-general] Rename `menhir`
Message-ID: <CAFQn-38br=vqG=MqPbS10BiaNn=31QCbiNSczwQMR1cB6anSdQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

Can you please rename `menhir` [1] to `ocaml-menhir` [2], to follow OCaml
Package Guidelines [3]?

Cheers,
Sergei

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15726
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55883
[3] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/OCaml_Package_Guidelines

From evangelos at foutrelis.com  Tue Jan 17 15:47:01 2012
From: evangelos at foutrelis.com (Evangelos Foutras)
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:47:01 +0200
Subject: [aur-general] Rename `menhir`
In-Reply-To: <CAFQn-38br=vqG=MqPbS10BiaNn=31QCbiNSczwQMR1cB6anSdQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFQn-38br=vqG=MqPbS10BiaNn=31QCbiNSczwQMR1cB6anSdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F15DE45.6080506@foutrelis.com>

On 17/01/12 22:43, Sergei Lebedev wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Can you please rename `menhir` [1] to `ocaml-menhir` [2], to follow OCaml
> Package Guidelines [3]?

Sure, also transferred the votes and comments over.

From notorca at gmail.com  Tue Jan 17 16:44:18 2012
From: notorca at gmail.com (Cyril Lashkevich)
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:44:18 +0300
Subject: [aur-general] (no subject)
Message-ID: <CAM2RMB78kapZNaBxBy3_=nsXmY-zPQBQPqgJNnmzhYO=cM+2nQ@mail.gmail.com>

Package split2flac-hg is replaced by split2flac-git and as I guess should
be removed.

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28877

Thanks.

From psquid at psquid.net  Tue Jan 17 18:11:36 2012
From: psquid at psquid.net (Psychedelic Squid)
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:11:36 +0000
Subject: [aur-general] Rename `identicurse` and `identicurse-nogit`
Message-ID: <20120117231136.GA17871@foldston>

Hey, just wondering what the best approach would be for renaming
`identicurse` and `identicurse-nogit` to the more consistent (with other
AUR packages) `identicurse-git` and`identicurse`, respectively. In particular,
is there any way to prevent the current git users ending up on the new
non-git package, given the old git package and the new non-git package would
have the same name?

From lists at baums-on-web.de  Tue Jan 17 18:20:06 2012
From: lists at baums-on-web.de (Heiko Baums)
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:20:06 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] (no subject)
In-Reply-To: <CAM2RMB78kapZNaBxBy3_=nsXmY-zPQBQPqgJNnmzhYO=cM+2nQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAM2RMB78kapZNaBxBy3_=nsXmY-zPQBQPqgJNnmzhYO=cM+2nQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120118002006.37a9e208@darkstar>

Am Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:44:18 +0300
schrieb Cyril Lashkevich <notorca at gmail.com>:

> Package split2flac-hg is replaced by split2flac-git and as I guess
> should be removed.
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28877

And I guess the votes etc. of split2flac-hg should then be moved to
split2flac-git, too.

Btw., a subject would have been nice.

Heiko

From rodseth at gmail.com  Tue Jan 17 19:15:57 2012
From: rodseth at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alexander_R=F8dseth?=)
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 01:15:57 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] (no subject)
In-Reply-To: <20120118002006.37a9e208@darkstar>
References: <CAM2RMB78kapZNaBxBy3_=nsXmY-zPQBQPqgJNnmzhYO=cM+2nQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120118002006.37a9e208@darkstar>
Message-ID: <CAG7ayyt-_kbC0C6DK++2d6Jv6dAVkU55-z0DW3SkJBTHavaYRQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Cyril,

Thanks for including a link to the AUR package.
Would you prefer a plain removal of split2flac-hg or a removal where
votes and comments are merged into split2flac-git (if it's okay with
the current split2flac-git package maintainer)?

Thanks.

-- 
Cordially,
?Alexander R?dseth
?Arch Linux Trusted User
?(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

From nobody at archlinux.org  Wed Jan 18 04:07:04 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:07:04 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120118090704.16717.54209@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 3 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 1 fully signed off package
* 10 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (3 total) ==

* cdfs-2.6.27-19 (i686)
* open-vm-tools-modules-2011.12.20-3 (i686)
* slmodem-2.9.11-62 (i686)


== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) ==

* cdfs-2.6.27-19 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* ndiswrapper-1.57-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* open-vm-tools-modules-2011.12.20-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* slmodem-2.9.11-62 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* ndiswrapper-1.57-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (1 total) ==

* virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (x86_64)


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. tpowa - 5 signoffs
2. andyrtr - 1 signoffs


From nimetonmaili at gmail.com  Wed Jan 18 13:48:19 2012
From: nimetonmaili at gmail.com (Det)
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 20:48:19 +0200
Subject: [aur-general] 2 orphan requests: "xf86-input-evdev-git" and
	"git-git"
Message-ID: <4F1713F3.9060906@gmail.com>

Hey,

The following packages should be orphaned:

xf86-input-evdev-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41665
- out-of-date
- contains several mistakes
- doesn't build
- maintainer unresponsive to mail and comments
- last updated 29 May 2011

git-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17896
- out-of-date
- contains several mistakes
- maintainer (sirmacik ) claimed almost a month ago having  stopped 
using Arch (all his other packages should probably be orphaned too. Not 
going to maintain _them_, though)
- last updated 13 Jan 2010

From archlinux at cryptocrack.de  Wed Jan 18 14:09:13 2012
From: archlinux at cryptocrack.de (Lukas Fleischer)
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 20:09:13 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] 2 orphan requests: "xf86-input-evdev-git" and
 "git-git"
In-Reply-To: <4F1713F3.9060906@gmail.com>
References: <4F1713F3.9060906@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120118190913.GA8812@blizzard>

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 08:48:19PM +0200, Det wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> The following packages should be orphaned:
> 
> xf86-input-evdev-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41665
> - out-of-date
> - contains several mistakes
> - doesn't build
> - maintainer unresponsive to mail and comments
> - last updated 29 May 2011

Orphaned.

> 
> git-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17896
> - out-of-date
> - contains several mistakes
> - maintainer (sirmacik ) claimed almost a month ago having  stopped
> using Arch (all his other packages should probably be orphaned too.
> Not going to maintain _them_, though)
> - last updated 13 Jan 2010

Orphaned all of sirmacik's packages. Thanks for reporting!

From jason.melton at gmail.com  Wed Jan 18 17:01:17 2012
From: jason.melton at gmail.com (Jason Melton)
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 07:01:17 +0900
Subject: [aur-general] Deletion request: dkms-rtl8192se
Message-ID: <CADo+QN_2LV7-MauHCon2dBY56SJ2RNUyCiGb9UFYiEL0Fk5tOw@mail.gmail.com>

Please delete my package: dkms-rtl8192se[1]

Last reason for its existence (lts kernel < 3.0) has expired.


[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47330

From gostrc at gmail.com  Wed Jan 18 17:08:29 2012
From: gostrc at gmail.com (Thomas Dziedzic)
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:08:29 -0600
Subject: [aur-general] Deletion request: dkms-rtl8192se
In-Reply-To: <CADo+QN_2LV7-MauHCon2dBY56SJ2RNUyCiGb9UFYiEL0Fk5tOw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADo+QN_2LV7-MauHCon2dBY56SJ2RNUyCiGb9UFYiEL0Fk5tOw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CANFDciEowD4skV+MKLK7PC8QnkO2+nxvREj3H1VxPZ_env0P9g@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Jason Melton <jason.melton at gmail.com> wrote:
> Please delete my package: dkms-rtl8192se[1]
>
> Last reason for its existence (lts kernel < 3.0) has expired.
>
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47330

deleted

From darkelfdarkelf666 at yahoo.co.uk  Wed Jan 18 17:41:43 2012
From: darkelfdarkelf666 at yahoo.co.uk (Jagmjp Janpgm)
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:41:43 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [aur-general] Package removal request
Message-ID: <1326926503.70050.YahooMailNeo@web28612.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>

Could you remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55683 as it is now merged with cinnamon-git?

From rodseth at gmail.com  Wed Jan 18 18:53:41 2012
From: rodseth at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alexander_R=F8dseth?=)
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:53:41 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] (no subject)
In-Reply-To: <CAG7ayyt-_kbC0C6DK++2d6Jv6dAVkU55-z0DW3SkJBTHavaYRQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAM2RMB78kapZNaBxBy3_=nsXmY-zPQBQPqgJNnmzhYO=cM+2nQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120118002006.37a9e208@darkstar>
 <CAG7ayyt-_kbC0C6DK++2d6Jv6dAVkU55-z0DW3SkJBTHavaYRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAG7ayyu-bcrWS2foea6pnkuMkkCz4_hydqaZhVmTm1hOjB2Ung@mail.gmail.com>

Merged. Don't know who it's most fair that should maintain the
resulting package, so I panic-disowned it. First adopter owns. Thanks
for reporting.

-- 
Best regards,
?Alexander R?dseth
?Arch Linux Trusted User
?(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

From sl1pkn07 at gmail.com  Wed Jan 18 22:36:50 2012
From: sl1pkn07 at gmail.com (SpinFlo)
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 04:36:50 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [request remove] dclib-svn, eiskaltdc,
	eiskaltdc-svn and eiskaltdcpp-gtk-git
Message-ID: <CAAaYXTuRrAZ4R-TTiH4PACK=hK5V_OycFgRKgQrvNU+2mQzCGg@mail.gmail.com>

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46384 -> include into
eiskaltdcpp-git (splitted package)
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25636 -> no longer used
(include in eiskaltdcpp project)
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28815 -> outdated
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29623 -> used git intead (outdated)

greetings

From nobody at archlinux.org  Thu Jan 19 04:07:04 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 09:07:04 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120119090704.27347.85919@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) ==

* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. dan - 5 signoffs
2. bluewind - 3 signoffs
3. tpowa - 2 signoffs


From sven.heyll at googlemail.com  Thu Jan 19 06:05:58 2012
From: sven.heyll at googlemail.com (Sven Heyll)
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:05:58 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Erlang R15
In-Reply-To: <CAHbL2dfcU8RMEXsqg+6=saZ_L9XdE94+jyas+d5r=jREmj-4Yg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHbL2dfcU8RMEXsqg+6=saZ_L9XdE94+jyas+d5r=jREmj-4Yg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHbL2dfS_NdzJxZ3C9xVhP4=XssDu=aypoQ1tWUaMF6AJ_LFkQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi All

does anyone know when Erlang R15 will be available?

Cheers Sven

From g.vialetto at gmail.com  Thu Jan 19 09:31:46 2012
From: g.vialetto at gmail.com (Gianni Vialetto)
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:31:46 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Erlang R15
In-Reply-To: <CAHbL2dfS_NdzJxZ3C9xVhP4=XssDu=aypoQ1tWUaMF6AJ_LFkQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHbL2dfcU8RMEXsqg+6=saZ_L9XdE94+jyas+d5r=jREmj-4Yg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHbL2dfS_NdzJxZ3C9xVhP4=XssDu=aypoQ1tWUaMF6AJ_LFkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJWAGfLk1aAjxFzFF97y_yY59oCou0CubrmoTJCccCVCHKRk+Q@mail.gmail.com>

2012/1/19 Sven Heyll <sven.heyll at googlemail.com>:
> Hi All
>
> does anyone know when Erlang R15 will be available?

Have you already tried using the current PKGBUILD from [1] with
$pkgver set to R15B?


[1] http://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk?h=packages/erlang
-- 
Gianni Vialetto
"To see things in the seed, that is genius." - Lao Tzu

From ibiru at archlinux.org  Thu Jan 19 10:06:28 2012
From: ibiru at archlinux.org (Ionut Biru)
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:06:28 +0200
Subject: [aur-general] reminder - packagers untrusted
Message-ID: <4F183174.1090805@archlinux.org>

Hi,

know that we have pacman 4 in core, I noticed that some users cannot
install packages maintained by some packagers that didn't acquire at
least 3 master signatures.

Also you won't be able to push any new packages into repos because the
key is untrusted so is in your best interest to became trusted.

Please check your number and reply to all master emails as instructed
ASAP. Your key needs to be signed by all 5 master keys.

-- 
Ionu?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 554 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120119/9ae276d1/attachment.asc>

From parsiad.azimzadeh at gmail.com  Thu Jan 19 12:51:51 2012
From: parsiad.azimzadeh at gmail.com (Parsiad Azimzadeh)
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:51:51 -0500
Subject: [aur-general] Requesting action on djvu2pdf
Message-ID: <CAF+GmODp0BmaCj3bMy=c=yj2APfDA_umcjhmak+VvaFRzHqPUw@mail.gmail.com>

Long time Arch user, new to the AUR mailing list. djvu2pdf has been
flagged as out of date since October. pkgver should be changed to
0.9.2 and md5 should be changed to af93c29a857a014f86dffcff6c773ef1.

-- 
Parsiad Azimzadeh
http://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~pazimzad

From karol.blazewicz at gmail.com  Thu Jan 19 12:53:28 2012
From: karol.blazewicz at gmail.com (Karol Blazewicz)
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:53:28 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Requesting action on djvu2pdf
In-Reply-To: <CAF+GmODp0BmaCj3bMy=c=yj2APfDA_umcjhmak+VvaFRzHqPUw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF+GmODp0BmaCj3bMy=c=yj2APfDA_umcjhmak+VvaFRzHqPUw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAO0v=MNAwOkw+qL_1o6-2V6VeHx+gBdkzAVNsQqM35CZ0Di54w@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Parsiad Azimzadeh
<parsiad.azimzadeh at gmail.com> wrote:
> Long time Arch user, new to the AUR mailing list. djvu2pdf has been
> flagged as out of date since October. pkgver should be changed to
> 0.9.2 and md5 should be changed to af93c29a857a014f86dffcff6c773ef1.

You can always post this info in the comments on the AUR page:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18397

From parsiad.azimzadeh at gmail.com  Thu Jan 19 13:29:09 2012
From: parsiad.azimzadeh at gmail.com (Parsiad Azimzadeh)
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:29:09 -0500
Subject: [aur-general] Requesting action on djvu2pdf
In-Reply-To: <CAO0v=MNAwOkw+qL_1o6-2V6VeHx+gBdkzAVNsQqM35CZ0Di54w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF+GmODp0BmaCj3bMy=c=yj2APfDA_umcjhmak+VvaFRzHqPUw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO0v=MNAwOkw+qL_1o6-2V6VeHx+gBdkzAVNsQqM35CZ0Di54w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAF+GmODJ8ZS6GOdn0a=oC5W85F_t7xsiXHKO2AsZ_gz9VHSMEQ@mail.gmail.com>

> You can always post this info in the comments on the AUR page:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18397

I had figured that the maintainer was not reading the comments too
closely as it has been flagged out of date for a long time. I have
posted the comment there anyways.

Thanks.

-- 
Parsiad Azimzadeh
http://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~pazimzad

From karol.blazewicz at gmail.com  Thu Jan 19 13:30:36 2012
From: karol.blazewicz at gmail.com (Karol Blazewicz)
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:30:36 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Requesting action on djvu2pdf
In-Reply-To: <CAF+GmODJ8ZS6GOdn0a=oC5W85F_t7xsiXHKO2AsZ_gz9VHSMEQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF+GmODp0BmaCj3bMy=c=yj2APfDA_umcjhmak+VvaFRzHqPUw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO0v=MNAwOkw+qL_1o6-2V6VeHx+gBdkzAVNsQqM35CZ0Di54w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF+GmODJ8ZS6GOdn0a=oC5W85F_t7xsiXHKO2AsZ_gz9VHSMEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAO0v=MPpY6aR+ZKKriDa7J4kduFiqAJPZbdtG5wbxyGc7V8PSQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Parsiad Azimzadeh
<parsiad.azimzadeh at gmail.com> wrote:
>> You can always post this info in the comments on the AUR page:
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18397
>
> I had figured that the maintainer was not reading the comments too
> closely as it has been flagged out of date for a long time. I have
> posted the comment there anyways.

The comments are helpful to the users, even if they have to update the
PKGBUILD themselves.

From nado at troglodyte.be  Thu Jan 19 13:38:29 2012
From: nado at troglodyte.be (nado at troglodyte.be)
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:38:29 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Merge viewnior and viewnior-wp
Message-ID: <20120119183829.GA4219@troglodyte.be>

Hi,

I took maintaining of viewnior-wp?, because it?s a nice project and people would want set their wallpaper with viewnior.
And they can?t with the package viewnior?.
But the only things who change is the gconf dep and a command added to the ./configure.

So, why not merge these two packages : compile with wallpaper support, and set gconf as an opt dep ?
By the way, if people under gnome could try to set a wallpaper with viewnior-wp, it could be helpful, I don?t use gnome :).

1: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52709
2: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/viewnior/ https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/viewnior/

PS: I just noted I forgot to set gconf as a dep u_n

-- 
Pazdera Corentin (Nado)
Cl? PGP/PGP key : http://troglodyte.be/pub/pubkey.pgp.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120119/4eefddff/attachment-0001.asc>

From chillermillerlong at hotmail.com  Thu Jan 19 16:35:43 2012
From: chillermillerlong at hotmail.com (=?gb2312?B?0KHB+iCzwg==?=)
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:35:43 -0500
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: cinnamon-{session,applets}-git
In-Reply-To: <mailman.0.1327008564.5091.aur-general@archlinux.org>
References: <mailman.0.1327008564.5091.aur-general@archlinux.org>
Message-ID: <BAY156-W3413862C266E4E22558B8EA3860@phx.gbl>


Hello,
The cinnamon-applets-git and cinnamon-session-git packages have been merged into the main project upstream, so they can be removed.
Thanks,Xiao-Long Chen 		 	   		  

From allan at archlinux.org  Thu Jan 19 18:38:23 2012
From: allan at archlinux.org (Allan McRae)
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:38:23 +1000
Subject: [aur-general] reminder - packagers untrusted
In-Reply-To: <4F183174.1090805@archlinux.org>
References: <4F183174.1090805@archlinux.org>
Message-ID: <4F18A96F.9040408@archlinux.org>

On 20/01/12 01:06, Ionut Biru wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> know that we have pacman 4 in core, I noticed that some users cannot
> install packages maintained by some packagers that didn't acquire at
> least 3 master signatures.
> 
> Also you won't be able to push any new packages into repos because the
> key is untrusted so is in your best interest to became trusted.
> 
> Please check your number and reply to all master emails as instructed
> ASAP. Your key needs to be signed by all 5 master keys.
> 


FYI:

There are no packages in [extra] signed by a key without three master
key signatures (I rebuilt the only affected package).

In [community] there are 33 packages from two Trusted Users that are
affected.

Allan

From rodseth at gmail.com  Thu Jan 19 19:49:52 2012
From: rodseth at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alexander_R=F8dseth?=)
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 01:49:52 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Requesting action on djvu2pdf
In-Reply-To: <CAO0v=MPpY6aR+ZKKriDa7J4kduFiqAJPZbdtG5wbxyGc7V8PSQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF+GmODp0BmaCj3bMy=c=yj2APfDA_umcjhmak+VvaFRzHqPUw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO0v=MNAwOkw+qL_1o6-2V6VeHx+gBdkzAVNsQqM35CZ0Di54w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF+GmODJ8ZS6GOdn0a=oC5W85F_t7xsiXHKO2AsZ_gz9VHSMEQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO0v=MPpY6aR+ZKKriDa7J4kduFiqAJPZbdtG5wbxyGc7V8PSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAG7ayyt7mqNJeEDYpNtcFmN8CCf9zNUfuMmd=oKYmBpnQD+t0A@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Parsiad,

Welcome to the mailing list.

The usual procedure is to send an e-mail directly the maintainer
(tdy at gmx.com in this case) and if he/she doesn't reply or update the
package within 14 days, send an e-mail to this list, including a link
to the AUR page, requesting the package to be disowned. Sometimes AUR
package maintainers have turned off notifications for a package.

-- 
Best regards,
?Alexander R?dseth
?Arch Linux Trusted User
?(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

From sl1pkn07 at gmail.com  Thu Jan 19 22:45:50 2012
From: sl1pkn07 at gmail.com (SpinFlo)
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 04:45:50 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [remove request] eiskaltdcpp-gtk-git
Message-ID: <CAAaYXTv+DFyDYZktz8nCBD83zYB4cZb1OiWtmo2djsQE8Pn6WQ@mail.gmail.com>

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46384 -> include in the
splitted eiskalt-git package

greetings

From barthalion at gmail.com  Fri Jan 20 03:54:58 2012
From: barthalion at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QmFydMWCb21pZWogUGlvdHJvd3NraQ==?=)
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:54:58 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Merge viewnior and viewnior-wp
In-Reply-To: <20120119183829.GA4219@troglodyte.be>
References: <20120119183829.GA4219@troglodyte.be>
Message-ID: <4F192BE2.3060600@gmail.com>

On 01/19/2012 07:38 PM, nado at troglodyte.be wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I took maintaining of viewnior-wp?, because it?s a nice project and people would want set their wallpaper with viewnior.
> And they can?t with the package viewnior?.
> But the only things who change is the gconf dep and a command added to the ./configure.
> 
> So, why not merge these two packages : compile with wallpaper support, and set gconf as an opt dep ?
> By the way, if people under gnome could try to set a wallpaper with viewnior-wp, it could be helpful, I don?t use gnome :).
> 
> 1: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52709
> 2: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/viewnior/ https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/viewnior/
> 
> PS: I just noted I forgot to set gconf as a dep u_n
> 

You should open ticket on bugtracker instead of writing it here. Not
every dev and trusted user read mailing list.

-- 
Bart?omiej Piotrowski
Arch Linux Trusted User
http://archlinux.org/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120120/2e0ab635/attachment.asc>

From barthalion at gmail.com  Fri Jan 20 03:56:40 2012
From: barthalion at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QmFydMWCb21pZWogUGlvdHJvd3NraQ==?=)
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:56:40 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: cinnamon-{session,applets}-git
In-Reply-To: <BAY156-W3413862C266E4E22558B8EA3860@phx.gbl>
References: <mailman.0.1327008564.5091.aur-general@archlinux.org>
 <BAY156-W3413862C266E4E22558B8EA3860@phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <4F192C48.2080302@gmail.com>

On 01/19/2012 10:35 PM, ?? ? wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> The cinnamon-applets-git and cinnamon-session-git packages have been merged into the main project upstream, so they can be removed.
> Thanks,Xiao-Long Chen 		 	   		  

Please include URLs to packages next time. Done.

-- 
Bart?omiej Piotrowski
Arch Linux Trusted User
http://archlinux.org/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120120/f5d20d66/attachment.asc>

From barthalion at gmail.com  Fri Jan 20 03:58:42 2012
From: barthalion at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QmFydMWCb21pZWogUGlvdHJvd3NraQ==?=)
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:58:42 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [remove request] eiskaltdcpp-gtk-git
In-Reply-To: <CAAaYXTv+DFyDYZktz8nCBD83zYB4cZb1OiWtmo2djsQE8Pn6WQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAaYXTv+DFyDYZktz8nCBD83zYB4cZb1OiWtmo2djsQE8Pn6WQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F192CC2.2000700@gmail.com>

On 01/20/2012 04:45 AM, SpinFlo wrote:
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46384 -> include in the
> splitted eiskalt-git package
> 
> greetings

Done.

-- 
Bart?omiej Piotrowski
Arch Linux Trusted User
http://archlinux.org/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120120/4224fc9a/attachment.asc>

From nobody at archlinux.org  Fri Jan 20 04:07:04 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:07:04 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120120090704.22391.39252@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) ==

* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. allan - 7 signoffs
2. lfleischer - 3 signoffs
3. bisson - 2 signoffs
4. thomas - 2 signoffs
5. dan - 1 signoffs


From tunix at raptiye.org  Fri Jan 20 04:22:42 2012
From: tunix at raptiye.org (Alper Kanat)
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:22:42 +0200
Subject: [aur-general] creating versioned packages from github
Message-ID: <CAPMuxnSF0psuqx_3aQA=y1wBRwLZfu6F_X3GAxqVy15i0HDiYw@mail.gmail.com>

Hey There,

I want to package django-grappelli (version: 2.3.5) from github. I know
that usually we clone the repository and therefore have the latest commit
of the project for VCS PKGBUILD's. However in this case, I want to package
the latest stable version. So I wrote;

# Maintainer: Alper KANAT <alperkanat at raptiye.org>







pkgname=django-grappelli



pkgver=2.3.5



pkgrel=1



pkgdesc="A jazzy skin for the Django Admin-Interface"



url="https://github.com/sehmaschine/django-grappelli"



arch=('any')



license=('GPL2')



makedepends=("git" "python2" "python2-distribute")



conflicts=()



provides=()



source=(https://github.com/sehmaschine/django-grappelli/tarball/2.3.5)



md5sums=('36291a468ea10d50b33d782413cd436c')







build() {



    cd ${srcdir}



}

For test purposes, I tried to build this PKGBUILD. The tarball is
downloaded with the name 2.3.5 and successfully extracted into src/ folder
but with a commit id (which makes it kind of random):

$ ll src/
toplam 4
lrwxrwxrwx 1 tunix users   52 Oca 20 10:59 2.3.5 ->
/home/tunix/packages/alps/django-grappelli-git/2.3.5
drwxr-xr-x 4 tunix users 4096 Eki 11 11:07
sehmaschine-django-grappelli-ea9441b

So unless I do some bash magic like cd
$srcdir/sehmaschine-django-grappelli-*, I won't be able to continue to
build this package. What I wonder is if there are convenient ways to:

   - Download a tarball with a predefined name (in short: rename the output
   tarball)
   - Extract to predefined folder

that we can specify in PKGBUILD? I read the man pages of PKGBUILD and
makepkg and couldn't find such an information.

---
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

From massimiliano.torromeo at gmail.com  Fri Jan 20 04:30:27 2012
From: massimiliano.torromeo at gmail.com (Massimiliano Torromeo)
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:30:27 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] creating versioned packages from github
In-Reply-To: <CAPMuxnSF0psuqx_3aQA=y1wBRwLZfu6F_X3GAxqVy15i0HDiYw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPMuxnSF0psuqx_3aQA=y1wBRwLZfu6F_X3GAxqVy15i0HDiYw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAN=w4Y3iN3Dchu6sds9e7S0Qs8AK9EtJo9Xc_4Ly5uQyXg8FXA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Alper Kanat <tunix at raptiye.org> wrote:
> Hey There,

Hi

> I want to package django-grappelli (version: 2.3.5) from github. I know
> that usually we clone the repository and therefore have the latest commit
> of the project for VCS PKGBUILD's. However in this case, I want to package
> the latest stable version. So I wrote;
>
> # Maintainer: Alper KANAT <alperkanat at raptiye.org>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> pkgname=django-grappelli
>
>
>
> pkgver=2.3.5
>
>
>
> pkgrel=1
>
>
>
> pkgdesc="A jazzy skin for the Django Admin-Interface"
>
>
>
> url="https://github.com/sehmaschine/django-grappelli"
>
>
>
> arch=('any')
>
>
>
> license=('GPL2')
>
>
>
> makedepends=("git" "python2" "python2-distribute")

git is not a make dependency, since you are downloading a tarball
python2 should be moved to depends

> conflicts=()
>
>
>
> provides=()

remove all the empty variables from the PKGBUILD

> source=(https://github.com/sehmaschine/django-grappelli/tarball/2.3.5)

make it source=($pkgname-$pkgver.tar.gz::https://github.com/sehmaschine/$pkgname/tarball/$pkgver)

> md5sums=('36291a468ea10d50b33d782413cd436c')
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> build() {
>
>
>
> ? ?cd ${srcdir}
>
>
>
> }
>
> For test purposes, I tried to build this PKGBUILD. The tarball is
> downloaded with the name 2.3.5 and successfully extracted into src/ folder
> but with a commit id (which makes it kind of random):
>
> $ ll src/
> toplam 4
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 tunix users ? 52 Oca 20 10:59 2.3.5 ->
> /home/tunix/packages/alps/django-grappelli-git/2.3.5
> drwxr-xr-x 4 tunix users 4096 Eki 11 11:07
> sehmaschine-django-grappelli-ea9441b
>
> So unless I do some bash magic like cd
> $srcdir/sehmaschine-django-grappelli-*, I won't be able to continue to
> build this package. What I wonder is if there are convenient ways to:
>
> ? - Download a tarball with a predefined name (in short: rename the output
> ? tarball)
> ? - Extract to predefined folder
>
> that we can specify in PKGBUILD? I read the man pages of PKGBUILD and
> makepkg and couldn't find such an information.

Downloading with a different name is documented here:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD#source
I don't know of any option to extract to specific folder.

Cheers.

From auguste at gmail.com  Fri Jan 20 04:38:25 2012
From: auguste at gmail.com (Auguste Pop)
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:38:25 +0800
Subject: [aur-general] creating versioned packages from github
In-Reply-To: <CAPMuxnSF0psuqx_3aQA=y1wBRwLZfu6F_X3GAxqVy15i0HDiYw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPMuxnSF0psuqx_3aQA=y1wBRwLZfu6F_X3GAxqVy15i0HDiYw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAKjTroMw8u03QKRrm-fLAVDn+41e4EgFzzMspzMq+sgu8c4EMg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Alper Kanat <tunix at raptiye.org> wrote:
> Hey There,
>
> I want to package django-grappelli (version: 2.3.5) from github. I know
> that usually we clone the repository and therefore have the latest commit
> of the project for VCS PKGBUILD's. However in this case, I want to package
> the latest stable version. So I wrote;
>
>
> $ ll src/
> toplam 4
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 tunix users ? 52 Oca 20 10:59 2.3.5 ->
> /home/tunix/packages/alps/django-grappelli-git/2.3.5
> drwxr-xr-x 4 tunix users 4096 Eki 11 11:07
> sehmaschine-django-grappelli-ea9441b
>
> So unless I do some bash magic like cd
> $srcdir/sehmaschine-django-grappelli-*, I won't be able to continue to
> build this package. What I wonder is if there are convenient ways to:
>
> ? - Download a tarball with a predefined name (in short: rename the output
> ? tarball)
> ? - Extract to predefined folder
>
> that we can specify in PKGBUILD? I read the man pages of PKGBUILD and
> makepkg and couldn't find such an information.

you can always try to manually extract the file, combined with a
proper -C and --xform parameter of tar.

best regards,

From jesse.jaara at gmail.com  Fri Jan 20 07:13:31 2012
From: jesse.jaara at gmail.com (Jesse Juhani Jaara)
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:13:31 +0200
Subject: [aur-general] creating versioned packages from github
In-Reply-To: <CAPMuxnSF0psuqx_3aQA=y1wBRwLZfu6F_X3GAxqVy15i0HDiYw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPMuxnSF0psuqx_3aQA=y1wBRwLZfu6F_X3GAxqVy15i0HDiYw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <2290585.kOXFXxEvOg@pii>

In the future please not use so too manu newlines....
If you do, I will confiscate your Enter keys....

Anyway take a look in yle-downloader-gui's PKGBUILD 
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51662
Thats how I do it. You can just simply copy the 1st 7
chars of the commit id in the tags menu in github :D
Hope it helps
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120120/a4ce2e91/attachment.asc>

From rodseth at gmail.com  Fri Jan 20 08:00:44 2012
From: rodseth at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alexander_R=F8dseth?=)
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:00:44 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] creating versioned packages from github
In-Reply-To: <2290585.kOXFXxEvOg@pii>
References: <CAPMuxnSF0psuqx_3aQA=y1wBRwLZfu6F_X3GAxqVy15i0HDiYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <2290585.kOXFXxEvOg@pii>
Message-ID: <CAG7ayyuncxoo7O-Zirua4MVwKA4arc-vrTj8JBqH5AQXEBU+=g@mail.gmail.com>

Also, this forum is really helpful: "AUR Issues, Discussion & PKGBUILD
Requests" at https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewforum.php?id=38

-- 
Cordially,
?Alexander R?dseth
?Arch Linux Trusted User
?(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

From tunix at raptiye.org  Fri Jan 20 09:12:11 2012
From: tunix at raptiye.org (Alper Kanat)
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:12:11 +0200
Subject: [aur-general] creating versioned packages from github
In-Reply-To: <2290585.kOXFXxEvOg@pii>
References: <CAPMuxnSF0psuqx_3aQA=y1wBRwLZfu6F_X3GAxqVy15i0HDiYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <2290585.kOXFXxEvOg@pii>
Message-ID: <CAPMuxnTinyRmeAuUHo8VgtrTXypSHcmg5yM2EG7t+wSXqSXoNA@mail.gmail.com>

Hey There,

---
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?


On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 14:13, Jesse Juhani Jaara <jesse.jaara at gmail.com>wrote:

> In the future please not use so too manu newlines....
> If you do, I will confiscate your Enter keys....
>

I can't understand what you mean?

From nado at troglodyte.be  Fri Jan 20 09:22:26 2012
From: nado at troglodyte.be (nado at troglodyte.be)
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:22:26 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] creating versioned packages from github
In-Reply-To: <CAPMuxnTinyRmeAuUHo8VgtrTXypSHcmg5yM2EG7t+wSXqSXoNA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPMuxnSF0psuqx_3aQA=y1wBRwLZfu6F_X3GAxqVy15i0HDiYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <2290585.kOXFXxEvOg@pii>
 <CAPMuxnTinyRmeAuUHo8VgtrTXypSHcmg5yM2EG7t+wSXqSXoNA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120120142226.GA14647@troglodyte.be>

Le vendredi 20 jan 2012 ? 16:12:11 (+0200), Alper Kanat a ?crit :
> Hey There,
> 
> ---
> Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 14:13, Jesse Juhani Jaara <jesse.jaara at gmail.com>wrote:
> 
> > In the future please not use so too manu newlines....
> > If you do, I will confiscate your Enter keys....
> >
> 
> I can't understand what you mean?
In a mail-list, avoid to use so many newlines. Juste write some paragraphs, and not alone sentences.

-- 
Pazdera Corentin (Nado)
Cl? PGP/PGP key : http://troglodyte.be/pub/pubkey.pgp.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120120/81751890/attachment.asc>

From jesse.jaara at gmail.com  Fri Jan 20 09:42:38 2012
From: jesse.jaara at gmail.com (Jesse Juhani Jaara)
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:42:38 +0200
Subject: [aur-general] creating versioned packages from github
In-Reply-To: <CAPMuxnTinyRmeAuUHo8VgtrTXypSHcmg5yM2EG7t+wSXqSXoNA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPMuxnSF0psuqx_3aQA=y1wBRwLZfu6F_X3GAxqVy15i0HDiYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <2290585.kOXFXxEvOg@pii>
 <CAPMuxnTinyRmeAuUHo8VgtrTXypSHcmg5yM2EG7t+wSXqSXoNA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7024085.Kfqm1Fne4H@pii>

perjantai, 20. tammikuuta 2012 16:12:11 Alper Kanat kirjoitti:
> Hey There,
> 
> ---
> Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
> 
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 14:13, Jesse Juhani Jaara 
<jesse.jaara at gmail.com>wrote:
> > In the future please not use so too manu newlines....
> > If you do, I will confiscate your Enter keys....
> 
> I can't understand what you mean?
I'm referring to this....
###########
pkgname=django-grappelli



pkgver=2.3.5



pkgrel=1
############
Those 3 empty newlines you have there make the thing a hell of lot harder to 
read. Many are also reading their mail on 3" screen of their smart phone. 

pkgname=django-grappelli
pkgver=2.3.5
pkgrel=1

See, its not hard to read them eventought they are straight under each others.  
And saves a lot of key stokes if you edit that in console :D
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120120/3ee9d0e4/attachment.asc>

From tunix at raptiye.org  Fri Jan 20 10:02:28 2012
From: tunix at raptiye.org (Alper Kanat)
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:02:28 +0200
Subject: [aur-general] creating versioned packages from github
In-Reply-To: <7024085.Kfqm1Fne4H@pii>
References: <CAPMuxnSF0psuqx_3aQA=y1wBRwLZfu6F_X3GAxqVy15i0HDiYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <2290585.kOXFXxEvOg@pii>
 <CAPMuxnTinyRmeAuUHo8VgtrTXypSHcmg5yM2EG7t+wSXqSXoNA@mail.gmail.com>
 <7024085.Kfqm1Fne4H@pii>
Message-ID: <CAPMuxnTbarBxf6b9ffUmG+8R7OeKvkckzJ=6LeHnNJ-UaKGG_Q@mail.gmail.com>

Well this is how it looks to me: http://cl.ly/DVV8

I don't know what went wrong but sorry for any inconveniences.

---
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?


On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 16:42, Jesse Juhani Jaara <jesse.jaara at gmail.com>wrote:

> perjantai, 20. tammikuuta 2012 16:12:11 Alper Kanat kirjoitti:
> > Hey There,
> >
> > ---
> > Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 14:13, Jesse Juhani Jaara
> <jesse.jaara at gmail.com>wrote:
> > > In the future please not use so too manu newlines....
> > > If you do, I will confiscate your Enter keys....
> >
> > I can't understand what you mean?
> I'm referring to this....
> ###########
> pkgname=django-grappelli
>
>
>
> pkgver=2.3.5
>
>
>
> pkgrel=1
> ############
> Those 3 empty newlines you have there make the thing a hell of lot harder
> to
> read. Many are also reading their mail on 3" screen of their smart phone.
>
> pkgname=django-grappelli
> pkgver=2.3.5
> pkgrel=1
>
> See, its not hard to read them eventought they are straight under each
> others.
> And saves a lot of key stokes if you edit that in console :D

From nado at troglodyte.be  Fri Jan 20 10:13:09 2012
From: nado at troglodyte.be (nado at troglodyte.be)
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:13:09 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] creating versioned packages from github
In-Reply-To: <CAPMuxnTbarBxf6b9ffUmG+8R7OeKvkckzJ=6LeHnNJ-UaKGG_Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPMuxnSF0psuqx_3aQA=y1wBRwLZfu6F_X3GAxqVy15i0HDiYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <2290585.kOXFXxEvOg@pii>
 <CAPMuxnTinyRmeAuUHo8VgtrTXypSHcmg5yM2EG7t+wSXqSXoNA@mail.gmail.com>
 <7024085.Kfqm1Fne4H@pii>
 <CAPMuxnTbarBxf6b9ffUmG+8R7OeKvkckzJ=6LeHnNJ-UaKGG_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120120151309.GB14647@troglodyte.be>

Le vendredi 20 jan 2012 ? 17:02:28 (+0200), Alper Kanat a ?crit :
> Well this is how it looks to me: http://cl.ly/DVV8
> 
> I don't know what went wrong but sorry for any inconveniences.
Try to write in plain text instead of Rich formatting next time ;)
Oh, and also write at the bottom of an e-mail, not at the top.

-- 
Pazdera Corentin (Nado)
Cl? PGP/PGP key : http://troglodyte.be/pub/pubkey.pgp.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120120/35c69858/attachment.asc>

From wormzy.tykashi at gmail.com  Fri Jan 20 10:17:25 2012
From: wormzy.tykashi at gmail.com (WorMzy Tykashi)
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:17:25 +0000
Subject: [aur-general] creating versioned packages from github
In-Reply-To: <CAPMuxnTbarBxf6b9ffUmG+8R7OeKvkckzJ=6LeHnNJ-UaKGG_Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPMuxnSF0psuqx_3aQA=y1wBRwLZfu6F_X3GAxqVy15i0HDiYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <2290585.kOXFXxEvOg@pii>
 <CAPMuxnTinyRmeAuUHo8VgtrTXypSHcmg5yM2EG7t+wSXqSXoNA@mail.gmail.com>
 <7024085.Kfqm1Fne4H@pii>
 <CAPMuxnTbarBxf6b9ffUmG+8R7OeKvkckzJ=6LeHnNJ-UaKGG_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALOYprV_Nwa6mK=vkzwDE-Y2anZnkpaGjTQVsM__6Sbod0KeDA@mail.gmail.com>

I guess it's because you're using fancy formatted text, while others
(like myself) are using plain text. For some reason google's decided
that 1 formatted text linebreak == 3 unformatted text linebreaks. Or
something.

On 20 January 2012 15:02, Alper Kanat <tunix at raptiye.org> wrote:
> Well this is how it looks to me: http://cl.ly/DVV8
>
> I don't know what went wrong but sorry for any inconveniences.
>
> ---
> Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 16:42, Jesse Juhani Jaara <jesse.jaara at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> perjantai, 20. tammikuuta 2012 16:12:11 Alper Kanat kirjoitti:
>> > Hey There,
>> >
>> > ---
>> > Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 14:13, Jesse Juhani Jaara
>> <jesse.jaara at gmail.com>wrote:
>> > > In the future please not use so too manu newlines....
>> > > If you do, I will confiscate your Enter keys....
>> >
>> > I can't understand what you mean?
>> I'm referring to this....
>> ###########
>> pkgname=django-grappelli
>>
>>
>>
>> pkgver=2.3.5
>>
>>
>>
>> pkgrel=1
>> ############
>> Those 3 empty newlines you have there make the thing a hell of lot harder
>> to
>> read. Many are also reading their mail on 3" screen of their smart phone.
>>
>> pkgname=django-grappelli
>> pkgver=2.3.5
>> pkgrel=1
>>
>> See, its not hard to read them eventought they are straight under each
>> others.
>> And saves a lot of key stokes if you edit that in console :D

From chillermillerlong at hotmail.com  Fri Jan 20 12:45:44 2012
From: chillermillerlong at hotmail.com (=?utf-8?B?5bCP6b6ZIOmZiA==?=)
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:45:44 -0500
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: cinnamon-{session,applets}-git
In-Reply-To: <4F192C48.2080302@gmail.com>
References: <mailman.0.1327008564.5091.aur-general@archlinux.org>,
 <BAY156-W3413862C266E4E22558B8EA3860@phx.gbl>, <4F192C48.2080302@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BAY156-W59C3859EA8E387F37240DAA3870@phx.gbl>


Hi Bartlomiej,

Thanks! I'll remember to include the URLs next time.

Regards,
Xiao-Long Chen

> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:56:40 +0100
> From: barthalion at gmail.com
> To: aur-general at archlinux.org
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] Removal request: cinnamon-{session,applets}-git
> 
> On 01/19/2012 10:35 PM, ?? ? wrote:
> > 
> > Hello,
> > The cinnamon-applets-git and cinnamon-session-git packages have been merged into the main project upstream, so they can be removed.
> > Thanks,Xiao-Long Chen 		 	   		  
> 
> Please include URLs to packages next time. Done.
> 
> -- 
> Bart?omiej Piotrowski
> Arch Linux Trusted User
> http://archlinux.org/
> 
 		 	   		  

From nado at troglodyte.be  Fri Jan 20 14:07:45 2012
From: nado at troglodyte.be (nado at troglodyte.be)
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:07:45 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Merge viewnior and viewnior-wp
In-Reply-To: <4F192BE2.3060600@gmail.com>
References: <20120119183829.GA4219@troglodyte.be> <4F192BE2.3060600@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120120190745.GA15034@troglodyte.be>

Le vendredi 20 jan 2012 ? 09:54:58 (+0100), Bart?omiej Piotrowski a ?crit :
> You should open ticket on bugtracker instead of writing it here. Not
> every dev and trusted user read mailing list.
Thanks, I?ll do it.


-- 
Pazdera Corentin (Nado)
Cl? PGP/PGP key : http://troglodyte.be/pub/pubkey.pgp.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120120/4dd42c63/attachment.asc>

From nobody at archlinux.org  Sat Jan 21 04:07:04 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 09:07:04 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120121090704.4952.53414@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) ==

* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. tomegun - 3 signoffs
2. ibiru - 2 signoffs
3. thomas - 1 signoffs
4. dan - 1 signoffs


From stefan-husmann at t-online.de  Sat Jan 21 13:19:41 2012
From: stefan-husmann at t-online.de (Stefan Husmann)
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 19:19:41 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [remove request] Duplicate package
Message-ID: <4F1B01BD.50302@t-online.de>

Hello,

please remov cairo-dock-plug-ins-bzr(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49658).
It is a duplicate of cairo-dock-plugins-bzr (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30335).

Best Regards Stefan

From seblu at seblu.net  Sat Jan 21 12:42:01 2012
From: seblu at seblu.net (Seblu)
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 18:42:01 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [remove request] Duplicate package
In-Reply-To: <4F1B01BD.50302@t-online.de>
References: <4F1B01BD.50302@t-online.de>
Message-ID: <CAJSTwE7s6pkArHeDTrA=CC0VoKGgyBbgk-GPrr8SLXxKgGLuaQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Stefan Husmann
<stefan-husmann at t-online.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> please remov
> cairo-dock-plug-ins-bzr(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49658).
> It is a duplicate of cairo-dock-plugins-bzr
> (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30335).
Done.

Cheers,


-- 
S?bastien Luttringer
www.seblu.net

From rnabioullin at gmail.com  Sat Jan 21 18:44:40 2012
From: rnabioullin at gmail.com (Ruslan Nabioullin)
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 18:44:40 -0500
Subject: [aur-general] Orphan Request: owx
In-Reply-To: <4EF3BB59.3050400@gmail.com>
References: <4EF3BB59.3050400@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F1B4DE8.7040004@gmail.com>

Hello,

The AUR package "owx" [1] does not build. I have attempted to contact
the maintainer in order to send a patch, but to no avail. Therefore, I
am interested in maintaining this package.

Thanks in advance,
-Ruslan

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42448

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: AUR owx package fix
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 18:20:57 -0500
From: Ruslan Nabioullin <rnabioullin at gmail.com>
To: ur6lad at archlinux.org.ua

Hello ur6lad,

The PKGBUILD in your owx package downloads the daily SVN snapshot
tarball, which changes daily (due to the name of the dir within it
having the current date); thus, the checksums change daily, and it is
impossible to build the package. I have created a patch (the email
attachment) to PKGBUILD, which checks out the current (as of now)
revision from SVN instead of downloading the snapshot (which would be
less reliable). In addition, it fixes a few trivial errors (regarding
Archlinux standards) and improves grammar.

-kb1vyp

-- 
Ruslan Nabioullin
rnabioullin at gmail.com


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 900 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120121/1bca55de/attachment.asc>

From gostrc at gmail.com  Sat Jan 21 20:58:45 2012
From: gostrc at gmail.com (Thomas Dziedzic)
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 19:58:45 -0600
Subject: [aur-general] Orphan Request: owx
In-Reply-To: <4F1B4DE8.7040004@gmail.com>
References: <4EF3BB59.3050400@gmail.com>
	<4F1B4DE8.7040004@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CANFDciG5fF7N6HGUe29bprcsNqZM6PXqMC2tFVCMX5JrZ_P4ag@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Ruslan Nabioullin
<rnabioullin at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The AUR package "owx" [1] does not build. I have attempted to contact
> the maintainer in order to send a patch, but to no avail. Therefore, I
> am interested in maintaining this package.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> -Ruslan
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42448
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: AUR owx package fix
> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 18:20:57 -0500
> From: Ruslan Nabioullin <rnabioullin at gmail.com>
> To: ur6lad at archlinux.org.ua
>
> Hello ur6lad,
>
> The PKGBUILD in your owx package downloads the daily SVN snapshot
> tarball, which changes daily (due to the name of the dir within it
> having the current date); thus, the checksums change daily, and it is
> impossible to build the package. I have created a patch (the email
> attachment) to PKGBUILD, which checks out the current (as of now)
> revision from SVN instead of downloading the snapshot (which would be
> less reliable). In addition, it fixes a few trivial errors (regarding
> Archlinux standards) and improves grammar.
>
> -kb1vyp
>
> --
> Ruslan Nabioullin
> rnabioullin at gmail.com
>
>

disowned

From sl1pkn07 at gmail.com  Sat Jan 21 22:56:30 2012
From: sl1pkn07 at gmail.com (SpinFlo)
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 04:56:30 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [request remove] dclib-svn,
	eiskaltdc and eiskaltdc-svn
Message-ID: <CAAaYXTuaGcq9ZV0NAAC-SaU4YUifLdwAWakxd49=7yfXHrzsWg@mail.gmail.com>

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25636 -> no longer used
(include in eiskaltdcpp project)
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28815 -> outdated
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29623 -> used git intead (outdated)

greetings

From nobody at archlinux.org  Sun Jan 22 04:07:04 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 09:07:04 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120122090704.15780.84536@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) ==

* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. lcarlier - 4 signoffs
2. tomegun - 3 signoffs
3. bpiotrowski - 3 signoffs
4. thomas - 2 signoffs
5. bluewind - 2 signoffs


From mail at cvigano.de  Sun Jan 22 05:33:27 2012
From: mail at cvigano.de (Christoph Vigano)
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 11:33:27 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: gnash-git
Message-ID: <4F1BE5F7.9060902@cvigano.de>

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39699 (gnash-trunk-git) exists
longer and has more votes than my adopted package
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49364 (gnash-git).

I gave the packager some hints on how to improve his PKGBUILD and
therefore request removal of gnash-git.

Greetings,
  Christoph Vigano (kritztopf)

From jesse.jaara at gmail.com  Sun Jan 22 05:45:35 2012
From: jesse.jaara at gmail.com (Jesse Jaara)
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 12:45:35 +0200
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: gnash-git
In-Reply-To: <4F1BE5F7.9060902@cvigano.de>
References: <4F1BE5F7.9060902@cvigano.de>
Message-ID: <CAGb2M1OZuHfHfsZvF2nK+notyP45uU_3495G+EsdCRT3Brf6qA@mail.gmail.com>

Instead of being removed, shouldn't the gnash-trunk-git be merged to
gnash-git as it has better name. -git pkg should always pull the
master/trunk, whutoht a need to tell that in pkgname

From mail at cvigano.de  Sun Jan 22 05:51:38 2012
From: mail at cvigano.de (Christoph Vigano)
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 11:51:38 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: gnash-git
In-Reply-To: <CAGb2M1OZuHfHfsZvF2nK+notyP45uU_3495G+EsdCRT3Brf6qA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4F1BE5F7.9060902@cvigano.de>
 <CAGb2M1OZuHfHfsZvF2nK+notyP45uU_3495G+EsdCRT3Brf6qA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F1BEA3A.705@cvigano.de>

On 01/22/2012 11:45 AM, Jesse Jaara wrote:
> Instead of being removed, shouldn't the gnash-trunk-git be merged to
> gnash-git as it has better name. -git pkg should always pull the
> master/trunk, whutoht a need to tell that in pkgname

That's a good idea, should have thought of that. I'll suggest that to
the maintainer.

From l.jirkovsky at gmail.com  Sun Jan 22 07:40:13 2012
From: l.jirkovsky at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?THVrw6HFoSBKaXJrb3Zza8O9?=)
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:40:13 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [request remove] dclib-svn,
	eiskaltdc and eiskaltdc-svn
In-Reply-To: <CAAaYXTuaGcq9ZV0NAAC-SaU4YUifLdwAWakxd49=7yfXHrzsWg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAaYXTuaGcq9ZV0NAAC-SaU4YUifLdwAWakxd49=7yfXHrzsWg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAFa9FQubg1Nobz3AwP7WgZnoK56Le5GT=6QK+sjYax3A9CZeqg@mail.gmail.com>

On 22 January 2012 04:56, SpinFlo <sl1pkn07 at gmail.com> wrote:
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25636 -> no longer used
> (include in eiskaltdcpp project)
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28815 -> outdated
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29623 -> used git intead (outdated)
>
> greetings

All removed, thanks.

From kfgz at interia.pl  Sun Jan 22 11:48:22 2012
From: kfgz at interia.pl (Krzysztof Grygiencz)
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:48:22 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [Removal request] libcurl3 & libopenssl2
Message-ID: <4F1C3DD6.6070306@interia.pl>

Hi,

Can someone delete two of my packages that is [1] libcurl3 and [2] 
libopenssl2. Sometime ago mprime depend on them, but now they are no 
longer needed and they are old, deprecated and buggy.

[1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19375
[2] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19379


Regards,
Krzysztof Grygiencz (kfgz)

From jelle at vdwaa.nl  Sun Jan 22 14:11:19 2012
From: jelle at vdwaa.nl (Jelle van der Waa)
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 20:11:19 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [Removal request] libcurl3 & libopenssl2
In-Reply-To: <4F1C3DD6.6070306@interia.pl>
References: <4F1C3DD6.6070306@interia.pl>
Message-ID: <4F1C5F57.3050608@vdwaa.nl>

On 22/01/12 17:48, Krzysztof Grygiencz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Can someone delete two of my packages that is [1] libcurl3 and [2]
> libopenssl2. Sometime ago mprime depend on them, but now they are no
> longer needed and they are old, deprecated and buggy.
> 
> [1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19375
> [2] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19379
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Krzysztof Grygiencz (kfgz)
Moved to /dev/null

-- 
Jelle van der Waa

From nobody at archlinux.org  Mon Jan 23 04:07:03 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:07:03 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120123090703.16124.67144@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) ==

* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. bisson - 5 signoffs
2. tpowa - 4 signoffs
3. dreisner - 2 signoffs
4. dan - 2 signoffs


From kwpolska at gmail.com  Mon Jan 23 04:26:47 2012
From: kwpolska at gmail.com (Kwpolska)
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:26:47 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Removal Request: dropbox-faenza-*; pkgbuilder-legacy
Message-ID: <CAMw+j7K5K31i6z7W-f08=cezRgGWouayKFLi1VpBvB3RVjCcPA@mail.gmail.com>

Hello.  I need to get rid of three of my packages:

1. dropbox-faenza-dark:  https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43890
   Reason: those icons are included in the actual faenza-icon-theme.
2. dropbox-faenza-light: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48260
   Reason: those icons are included in the actual faenza-icon-theme.
3. pkgbuilder-legacy:    https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53699
   Reason: pacman 4 is in [core] for a week.
-- 
Kwpolska <http://kwpolska.tk>
stop html mail ? ? ?| always bottom-post
www.asciiribbon.org | www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
GPG KEY: 5EAAEA16 ? | Arch Linux x86_64, zsh, mutt, vim.
# vim:set textwidth=70:

From massimiliano.torromeo at gmail.com  Mon Jan 23 04:45:25 2012
From: massimiliano.torromeo at gmail.com (Massimiliano Torromeo)
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:45:25 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Removal Request: dropbox-faenza-*;
	pkgbuilder-legacy
In-Reply-To: <CAMw+j7K5K31i6z7W-f08=cezRgGWouayKFLi1VpBvB3RVjCcPA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMw+j7K5K31i6z7W-f08=cezRgGWouayKFLi1VpBvB3RVjCcPA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAN=w4Y2sh8S2WsUsi_p8KK4rpawH7a+JbOfb_R6WBrHBxMchww@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Kwpolska <kwpolska at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello. ?I need to get rid of three of my packages:
>
> 1. dropbox-faenza-dark: ?https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43890
> ? Reason: those icons are included in the actual faenza-icon-theme.
> 2. dropbox-faenza-light: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48260
> ? Reason: those icons are included in the actual faenza-icon-theme.
> 3. pkgbuilder-legacy: ? ?https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53699
> ? Reason: pacman 4 is in [core] for a week.
> --
> Kwpolska <http://kwpolska.tk>
> stop html mail ? ? ?| always bottom-post
> www.asciiribbon.org | www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
> GPG KEY: 5EAAEA16 ? | Arch Linux x86_64, zsh, mutt, vim.
> # vim:set textwidth=70:

Gone, thanks!

From stefan-husmann at t-online.de  Mon Jan 23 14:47:30 2012
From: stefan-husmann at t-online.de (Stefan Husmann)
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:47:30 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [Removal request] vym-git
Message-ID: <4F1DB952.4070500@t-online.de>

Hello,

there is not point in having vym-git in AUR. The stable version in [ccommunity] has a higher
version number, and developement actually takes place not in git, but in Suse's build service.

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48023

Regards Stefan

From giorgio.lando at gmail.com  Mon Jan 23 15:19:25 2012
From: giorgio.lando at gmail.com (Giorgio Lando)
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:19:25 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] orphan request: dma
Message-ID: <20120123201925.GB5581@clarabella.clarabella>

Could someone orphan the following in unsupported:

dma http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17039

The maintainer is not responsive to comments, updates it only randomly
 and did not reply in a week to an email concerning dma. Moreover, the main
dma upstream developer (corecode, who is also an arch user) is already
maintaining a PKGBUILD in his gitorious repo and would be happy to maintain it
in the AUR too (see the comments).

Thanks in advance
Giorgio Lando 

From jakob.gruber at gmail.com  Mon Jan 23 16:38:15 2012
From: jakob.gruber at gmail.com (Jakob Gruber)
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:38:15 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] orphan request: dma
In-Reply-To: <20120123201925.GB5581@clarabella.clarabella>
References: <20120123201925.GB5581@clarabella.clarabella>
Message-ID: <4F1DD347.2000609@gmail.com>

On 01/23/2012 09:19 PM, Giorgio Lando wrote:
> Could someone orphan the following in unsupported:
> 
> dma http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17039
> 
> The maintainer is not responsive to comments, updates it only randomly
>  and did not reply in a week to an email concerning dma. Moreover, the main
> dma upstream developer (corecode, who is also an arch user) is already
> maintaining a PKGBUILD in his gitorious repo and would be happy to maintain it
> in the AUR too (see the comments).
> 
> Thanks in advance
> Giorgio Lando 

Disowned, thanks!

From psquid at psquid.net  Mon Jan 23 17:07:31 2012
From: psquid at psquid.net (Psychedelic Squid)
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:07:31 +0000
Subject: [aur-general] Rename `identicurse` and `identicurse-nogit`
In-Reply-To: <20120117231136.GA17871@foldston>
References: <20120117231136.GA17871@foldston>
Message-ID: <20120123220731.GA29732@foldston>

On 17/01/12 at 11:11pm, Psychedelic Squid wrote:
> Hey, just wondering what the best approach would be for renaming
> `identicurse` and `identicurse-nogit` to the more consistent (with other
> AUR packages) `identicurse-git` and`identicurse`, respectively. In particular,
> is there any way to prevent the current git users ending up on the new
> non-git package, given the old git package and the new non-git package would
> have the same name?

Apologies if this is awful mailing-list etiquette (though my
understanding is that, having waited a reasonable amount of time, it
isn't), but I was wondering whether my original email (6 days ago now)
had simply been overlooked, or actively ignored for breaking a rule
which I am currently unaware of. If it was the latter, I'd appreciate
knowing why (even if the reply, for whatever reason, had to be off-list)
so I can avoid making the same mistake in future.

Hm, since I'm writing a new mail already, I might as well add two small
bits of information that I now realise I omitted last time. Firstly, I'm
the maintainer of `identicurse-nogit`, but not of `identicurse` (and I
have no intention of taking over the git one unless timttmy _really_
doesn't want to maintain it any more). Secondly, the package URLs are:

  identicurse-nogit: <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47432>
  identicurse-git: <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42734>

From i.caught.air at gmail.com  Mon Jan 23 18:29:11 2012
From: i.caught.air at gmail.com (Alex Belanger)
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:29:11 -0500
Subject: [aur-general] Rename `identicurse` and `identicurse-nogit`
In-Reply-To: <20120123220731.GA29732@foldston>
References: <20120117231136.GA17871@foldston> <20120123220731.GA29732@foldston>
Message-ID: <7FF7F88C-B5C0-4E92-968A-749143CC90A3@gmail.com>

I'm not a Trusted User (they know much more stuff than I do about packages), but in my opinion the name choices were wrong in the first place.

You may want to go through the trouble of warning your users about the future name changes, then ask here to make it happen.

Of course it's annoying for the end-users but if its for the better... why not.

Most of us will quickly give a look in the AUR as soon as something break for an explanation. Just don't forget to write  about it in the comments.

Btw, does the other maintainer knows?

On Jan 23, 2012, at 5:07 PM, Psychedelic Squid <psquid at psquid.net> wrote:

> On 17/01/12 at 11:11pm, Psychedelic Squid wrote:
>> Hey, just wondering what the best approach would be for renaming
>> `identicurse` and `identicurse-nogit` to the more consistent (with other
>> AUR packages) `identicurse-git` and`identicurse`, respectively. In particular,
>> is there any way to prevent the current git users ending up on the new
>> non-git package, given the old git package and the new non-git package would
>> have the same name?
> 
> Apologies if this is awful mailing-list etiquette (though my
> understanding is that, having waited a reasonable amount of time, it
> isn't), but I was wondering whether my original email (6 days ago now)
> had simply been overlooked, or actively ignored for breaking a rule
> which I am currently unaware of. If it was the latter, I'd appreciate
> knowing why (even if the reply, for whatever reason, had to be off-list)
> so I can avoid making the same mistake in future.
> 
> Hm, since I'm writing a new mail already, I might as well add two small
> bits of information that I now realise I omitted last time. Firstly, I'm
> the maintainer of `identicurse-nogit`, but not of `identicurse` (and I
> have no intention of taking over the git one unless timttmy _really_
> doesn't want to maintain it any more). Secondly, the package URLs are:
> 
>  identicurse-nogit: <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47432>
>  identicurse-git: <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42734>

From psquid at psquid.net  Mon Jan 23 18:50:17 2012
From: psquid at psquid.net (Psychedelic Squid)
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:50:17 +0000
Subject: [aur-general] Rename `identicurse` and `identicurse-nogit`
In-Reply-To: <7FF7F88C-B5C0-4E92-968A-749143CC90A3@gmail.com>
References: <20120117231136.GA17871@foldston> <20120123220731.GA29732@foldston>
 <7FF7F88C-B5C0-4E92-968A-749143CC90A3@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120123235017.GB29732@foldston>

On 23/01/12 at 06:29pm, Alex Belanger wrote:
> I'm not a Trusted User (they know much more stuff than I do about packages), but in my opinion the name choices were wrong in the first place.
> 
> You may want to go through the trouble of warning your users about the future name changes, then ask here to make it happen.
> 
> Of course it's annoying for the end-users but if its for the better... why not.
> 
> Most of us will quickly give a look in the AUR as soon as something break for an explanation. Just don't forget to write  about it in the comments.
> 
> Btw, does the other maintainer knows?
> 
> On Jan 23, 2012, at 5:07 PM, Psychedelic Squid <psquid at psquid.net> wrote:
> 
> -- SNIP --

Yes, the wrong name choices are why both myself and timttmy would prefer
them to be changed (he made a previous attempt at some time around the
26th of Oct last year[1], but somehow the package just ended up with 
a different version number. I'm not 100% sure why).

I was hoping there was some way to have AUR wrappers understand that the
packages had renamed, but I had suspected that there wasn't anything of
that nature. Ah well.

Anyway, I'll get on with making sure people are reasonably aware of the
name change, then post a follow-up here once it should be safe to do the
rename.

Thanks for the help!


[1] see the comments on <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42734>

From i.caught.air at gmail.com  Mon Jan 23 19:21:57 2012
From: i.caught.air at gmail.com (Alex Belanger)
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 19:21:57 -0500
Subject: [aur-general] Rename `identicurse` and `identicurse-nogit`
In-Reply-To: <20120123235017.GB29732@foldston>
References: <20120117231136.GA17871@foldston> <20120123220731.GA29732@foldston>
 <7FF7F88C-B5C0-4E92-968A-749143CC90A3@gmail.com>
 <20120123235017.GB29732@foldston>
Message-ID: <AA2CEAAE-8CF5-4EA3-A92E-7DEF446E0614@gmail.com>

For the information, his package ended up with the wrong name because the PKGBUILD contains this:

pkgname=identicurse
pkgver=git
pkgrel=1

Instead of:

pkgname='identicurse-git'
pkgver=20120123
pkgrel=1

The name of the package must end with -git in order to be a git package. Then the pkgver is the version, or in our case, the current date its submited to AUR for a git package.

- When a change is done in Git, your users will get the new files.
- If you ever have to update the PKGBUILD file for any reason, update the pkgver variable with the new current date, then upload to AUR as a new package, it'll automatically replace the older one with your fixes.
- If you have to do it twice in the same day, increment pkgrel to, say, 2 or 3, etc. but keep the same date.

SO! 

The best way to go, again in my opinion, ask for a removal of both packages in the AUR, then fix the two PKGBUILDs and their names, then re-upload online. That's what I'd do.

On Jan 23, 2012, at 6:50 PM, Psychedelic Squid <psquid at psquid.net> wrote:

> On 23/01/12 at 06:29pm, Alex Belanger wrote:
>> I'm not a Trusted User (they know much more stuff than I do about packages), but in my opinion the name choices were wrong in the first place.
>> 
>> You may want to go through the trouble of warning your users about the future name changes, then ask here to make it happen.
>> 
>> Of course it's annoying for the end-users but if its for the better... why not.
>> 
>> Most of us will quickly give a look in the AUR as soon as something break for an explanation. Just don't forget to write  about it in the comments.
>> 
>> Btw, does the other maintainer knows?
>> 
>> On Jan 23, 2012, at 5:07 PM, Psychedelic Squid <psquid at psquid.net> wrote:
>> 
>> -- SNIP --
> 
> Yes, the wrong name choices are why both myself and timttmy would prefer
> them to be changed (he made a previous attempt at some time around the
> 26th of Oct last year[1], but somehow the package just ended up with 
> a different version number. I'm not 100% sure why).
> 
> I was hoping there was some way to have AUR wrappers understand that the
> packages had renamed, but I had suspected that there wasn't anything of
> that nature. Ah well.
> 
> Anyway, I'll get on with making sure people are reasonably aware of the
> name change, then post a follow-up here once it should be safe to do the
> rename.
> 
> Thanks for the help!
> 
> 
> [1] see the comments on <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42734>

From rodseth at gmail.com  Tue Jan 24 03:17:41 2012
From: rodseth at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alexander_R=F8dseth?=)
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:17:41 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Rename `identicurse` and `identicurse-nogit`
In-Reply-To: <AA2CEAAE-8CF5-4EA3-A92E-7DEF446E0614@gmail.com>
References: <20120117231136.GA17871@foldston> <20120123220731.GA29732@foldston>
 <7FF7F88C-B5C0-4E92-968A-749143CC90A3@gmail.com>
 <20120123235017.GB29732@foldston>
 <AA2CEAAE-8CF5-4EA3-A92E-7DEF446E0614@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAG7ayys8RS6vXyRHx0VV-5vEUQsLbJC-9OjLnoxah2C_=cHExg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

No etiquette broken, thanks for contacting the mailing list. :)

We can either, as Alex Belanger suggests, remove both packages, then
you can re-upload with new names, or the following plan:
1. You can upload identicurse-git
2. We can remove identicurse-nogit
3. Then we can remove the current identicurse package, while merging
comments and votes into the new identicurse-git package
4. You can then upload the regular identicurse package and add a
comment about the change

If you opt for the second alternative, just let us know when
identicurse-git is uploaded, and we'll merge identicurse into it.

-- 
Best regards,
?Alexander R?dseth
?Arch Linux Trusted User
?(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

From rodseth at gmail.com  Tue Jan 24 03:18:59 2012
From: rodseth at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alexander_R=F8dseth?=)
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:18:59 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] [Removal request] vym-git
In-Reply-To: <4F1DB952.4070500@t-online.de>
References: <4F1DB952.4070500@t-online.de>
Message-ID: <CAG7ayyu2yL-MD7YhwbEFZGKH=pxVk2Kn9gHCVQ1BLAdhaeTdUQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi :)

Removed.

-- 
Cordially,
?Alexander R?dseth
?Arch Linux Trusted User
?(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

From nobody at archlinux.org  Tue Jan 24 04:07:04 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:07:04 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120124090704.25665.82163@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) ==

* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. allan - 3 signoffs
2. ibiru - 2 signoffs
3. stephane - 2 signoffs
4. pierre - 2 signoffs
5. foutrelis - 1 signoffs


From psquid at psquid.net  Tue Jan 24 06:27:46 2012
From: psquid at psquid.net (Psychedelic Squid)
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:27:46 +0000
Subject: [aur-general] Rename `identicurse` and `identicurse-nogit`
In-Reply-To: <CAG7ayys8RS6vXyRHx0VV-5vEUQsLbJC-9OjLnoxah2C_=cHExg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20120117231136.GA17871@foldston> <20120123220731.GA29732@foldston>
 <7FF7F88C-B5C0-4E92-968A-749143CC90A3@gmail.com>
 <20120123235017.GB29732@foldston>
 <AA2CEAAE-8CF5-4EA3-A92E-7DEF446E0614@gmail.com>
 <CAG7ayys8RS6vXyRHx0VV-5vEUQsLbJC-9OjLnoxah2C_=cHExg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120124112746.GA28316@foldston>

On 24/01/12 at 09:17am, Alexander R?dseth wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> No etiquette broken, thanks for contacting the mailing list. :)
> 
> We can either, as Alex Belanger suggests, remove both packages, then
> you can re-upload with new names, or the following plan:
> 1. You can upload identicurse-git
> 2. We can remove identicurse-nogit
> 3. Then we can remove the current identicurse package, while merging
> comments and votes into the new identicurse-git package
> 4. You can then upload the regular identicurse package and add a
> comment about the change
> 
> If you opt for the second alternative, just let us know when
> identicurse-git is uploaded, and we'll merge identicurse into it.
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> ?Alexander R?dseth
> ?Arch Linux Trusted User
> ?(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

Okay, I've uploaded identicurse-git, so I'm ready for you to merge in
the identicurse votes/comments and remove identicurse-nogit and the old
identicurse, when you have a chance. (Additionally, timttmy has
temporarily transferred maintainership of the git package to me so we
don't have to coordinate two people to get this rename done.)

Just drop me an email when the bits you need to do are done, and I'll
go right ahead with uploading the new package and adding the explanatory
comment to it.

From rodseth at gmail.com  Tue Jan 24 07:04:41 2012
From: rodseth at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alexander_R=F8dseth?=)
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:04:41 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Rename `identicurse` and `identicurse-nogit`
In-Reply-To: <20120124112746.GA28316@foldston>
References: <20120117231136.GA17871@foldston> <20120123220731.GA29732@foldston>
 <7FF7F88C-B5C0-4E92-968A-749143CC90A3@gmail.com>
 <20120123235017.GB29732@foldston>
 <AA2CEAAE-8CF5-4EA3-A92E-7DEF446E0614@gmail.com>
 <CAG7ayys8RS6vXyRHx0VV-5vEUQsLbJC-9OjLnoxah2C_=cHExg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120124112746.GA28316@foldston>
Message-ID: <CAG7ayyszgKqXuQmTnma0rOjNOHWM2v2coYaNSUGN30x8FKWijA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Ok, removed identicurse-nogit and deleted+merged identicurse into
indenticurse-git.

-- 
Sincerely,
?Alexander R?dseth
?Arch Linux Trusted User
?(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

From masutu.arch at googlemail.com  Tue Jan 24 18:45:30 2012
From: masutu.arch at googlemail.com (masutu)
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:45:30 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] makepkg/yaourt issues
Message-ID: <CAPDjeqH0sTQgUTCj6mmbJ9pbCSgeJBkJ1MoohMoXDNXFZzrycQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi all,

after recent upgrades (pacman 4, yaourt) i'm having issues with
makepkg/yaourt

(i) zipman option in "/etc/makepkg.conf"

if zipman is enabled in "/etc/makepkg.conf", makepkg gives errors like

[...]
==> Tidying install...
  -> Purging unwanted files...
  -> Compressing man and info pages...
==> ERROR: An unknown error has occurred. Exiting...
[...]

when running as root (yaourt/makepkg). Surprisingly man pages do get
gzipped and work correctly, so no real problem, just wondering. When
running makepkg as normal user, this error message doesn't occur. Similar
issue is discussed in https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1046860.

(ii) version control

example: trying to build lilv (
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49333) from aur, which contains
the line "depends=([...] 'sord>=0.5.0' 'sord<1.0.0' [...])"
when running "yaourt -S lilv" i get an error:

==> lilv dependencies:
 [...]
 - sord>=0.5.0 (building from AUR)
 - sord<1.0.0 (building from AUR)
 [...]
==> Continue building lilv ? [Y/n]
==> ------------------------------
==>
==> Building and installing package
==> Install or build missing dependencies for lilv:
error: target not found: sord<1.0.0
==> Restart building lilv ? [y/N]

but when installing sord-0.5.0-1 beforhand, lilv installs fine:
~$ yaourt -S lilv
==> lilv dependencies:
 [...]
 - sord>=0.5.0 (already installed)
 - sord<1.0.0 (already installed)
 [...]
==> Continue building lilv ? [Y/n]
 [...]

Is this a bug or normal behaviour?

Sorry for this messy post and thanks in advance for your replies.

-masutu

From rodseth at gmail.com  Tue Jan 24 19:59:29 2012
From: rodseth at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alexander_R=F8dseth?=)
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:59:29 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] makepkg/yaourt issues
In-Reply-To: <CAPDjeqH0sTQgUTCj6mmbJ9pbCSgeJBkJ1MoohMoXDNXFZzrycQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPDjeqH0sTQgUTCj6mmbJ9pbCSgeJBkJ1MoohMoXDNXFZzrycQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAG7ayysutLdo_6-Jj1n0fGXCpgbjEmYYuci9+adp9vL-xH2Biw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Although yaourt is a handy tool that has eased many a user into
installing packages from AUR, it's not part of the official
distribution, not part of the Arch Linux project and is not supported.

It's even made fun of and ridiculed by several prominent Arch Linux maintainers.

If there should be a problem with pacman that is unrelated to yaourt,
please report a bug at bugs.archlinux.org.

-- 
Sincerely,
?Alexander R?dseth
?Arch Linux Trusted User
?(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

From nobody at archlinux.org  Wed Jan 25 04:07:04 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:07:04 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120125090704.2377.16616@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) ==

* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. bisson - 6 signoffs
2. allan - 4 signoffs
3. lfleischer - 4 signoffs
4. tomegun - 3 signoffs
5. stephane - 2 signoffs


From drizzd at aon.at  Wed Jan 25 07:09:59 2012
From: drizzd at aon.at (Clemens Buchacher)
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:09:59 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request for octave-forge
Message-ID: <20120125120959.GA21718@ecki>

Hi,

Please remove octave-forge [1]. It has been flagged out-of-date and
cannot be updated, because it is no longer available upstream.

Instead, octave-forge is now distributed as many individual
packages [2], several of which are available on AUR [3].

TIA,
Clemens

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20824
[2] http://octave.sourceforge.net/packages.php
[3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?O=0&K=octave-&do_Search=Go

From nobody at archlinux.org  Thu Jan 26 04:07:05 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:07:05 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120126090705.25252.48949@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) ==

* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. tpowa - 9 signoffs
2. allan - 2 signoffs
3. ibiru - 1 signoffs
4. dan - 1 signoffs
5. tomegun - 1 signoffs


From fdev31 at gmail.com  Thu Jan 26 14:12:22 2012
From: fdev31 at gmail.com (Fabien Devaux)
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:12:22 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] A package looks not maintained anymore
Message-ID: <CAFm0kZoDsNLaeT-Rr8xkTZSG3k87Sg-cxO+zVtHfcv3Lz8F4GA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,
first, I'm quite new to archlinux so I'm still learning the basics...
The "snaked-git" package at
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42305 looks
updated,
I tried to contact package's author without any success.

I own an updated version of the PKGBUILD file with proper content, but I'm
not the owner.

How should I proceed ? Shall I just click "outdated" in the web form ?

Thanks for your help,
Fabien Devaux.

From mail at philip.in-aachen.net  Thu Jan 26 14:13:45 2012
From: mail at philip.in-aachen.net (=?utf-8?Q?Philip_M=C3=BCller?=)
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:13:45 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] A package looks not maintained anymore
In-Reply-To: <CAFm0kZoDsNLaeT-Rr8xkTZSG3k87Sg-cxO+zVtHfcv3Lz8F4GA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFm0kZoDsNLaeT-Rr8xkTZSG3k87Sg-cxO+zVtHfcv3Lz8F4GA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <op.v8pg07bwtob0l5@localhost.localdomain>

flag as outdated and post a link to your PKGBUILD in a comment on the  
package.

On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:12:22 +0100, Fabien Devaux <fdev31 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> first, I'm quite new to archlinux so I'm still learning the basics...
> The "snaked-git" package at
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42305 looks
> updated,
> I tried to contact package's author without any success.
>
> I own an updated version of the PKGBUILD file with proper content, but  
> I'm
> not the owner.
>
> How should I proceed ? Shall I just click "outdated" in the web form ?
>
> Thanks for your help,
> Fabien Devaux.
>



From antoniolucasnobar at gmail.com  Thu Jan 26 20:08:50 2012
From: antoniolucasnobar at gmail.com (Antonio Lucas)
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:08:50 -0200
Subject: [aur-general] removal request kde icon tasks
Message-ID: <CA+UcQXO8FJKpFVHHvDnC5ofJ3aQdnWbm3EwYSVTVjpQhnRhh8A@mail.gmail.com>

plasma-icontasks https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51961 is now
available on testing (hopefully soon in extra).

testing/kdeplasma-addons-applets-icontasks

I dont know if it is enough to remove a package in aur, so it is up to you
guys

cheers,
Lucas

From nobody at archlinux.org  Fri Jan 27 04:07:05 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:07:05 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120127090705.9770.69886@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) ==

* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. ibiru - 4 signoffs
2. tomegun - 3 signoffs
3. thomas - 2 signoffs
4. bisson - 2 signoffs
5. dan - 1 signoffs


From rodseth at gmail.com  Fri Jan 27 05:43:04 2012
From: rodseth at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alexander_R=F8dseth?=)
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:43:04 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] removal request kde icon tasks
In-Reply-To: <CA+UcQXO8FJKpFVHHvDnC5ofJ3aQdnWbm3EwYSVTVjpQhnRhh8A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+UcQXO8FJKpFVHHvDnC5ofJ3aQdnWbm3EwYSVTVjpQhnRhh8A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAG7ayysG3thQjDzKtrCduZY5JNXtr+bRDFitGZCJ50uwf6VtcQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

If a dev/tu adds a package to one of the official repos, they are
supposed to also remove the AUR packages for the same software, as
part of the process.

-- 
Best regards,
?Alexander R?dseth
?Arch Linux Trusted User
?(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

From ngoonee.talk at gmail.com  Fri Jan 27 05:45:37 2012
From: ngoonee.talk at gmail.com (Oon-Ee Ng)
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:45:37 +0800
Subject: [aur-general] removal request kde icon tasks
In-Reply-To: <CAG7ayysG3thQjDzKtrCduZY5JNXtr+bRDFitGZCJ50uwf6VtcQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+UcQXO8FJKpFVHHvDnC5ofJ3aQdnWbm3EwYSVTVjpQhnRhh8A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAG7ayysG3thQjDzKtrCduZY5JNXtr+bRDFitGZCJ50uwf6VtcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAGQ70etw4jeS90_8BoUp_TPZNycUw7PCDccdXe-Edif-zSXxZA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Alexander R?dseth <rodseth at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If a dev/tu adds a package to one of the official repos, they are
> supposed to also remove the AUR packages for the same software, as
> part of the process.
>
Though I guess in this case this won't be done until it moves to [extra]?

From eldermarco at gmail.com  Fri Jan 27 18:29:22 2012
From: eldermarco at gmail.com (Elder Marco)
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:29:22 -0200
Subject: [aur-general] removal request:
	gnome-shell-extension-remove-acessibility-icon
Message-ID: <CAJa2Z+5WdrV8VGFA44+CJei44Riqvi2pq_yngPtrbweb8OMXsw@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

I adopted gnome-shell-extension-noa11y[1].  I'm also the maintainer of the
gnome-shell-extension-remove-accessibility-icon[2]. Those packages have the
same functionality and we don't need two packages for removing the
accessibility icon. I prefer the first one.

So, could  you remove gnome-shell-extension-remove-accessibility-icon[2]?

[1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49647
[2] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51523

Thanks.

-- 
Elder Marco

GNU/Linux User: #471180

"Contra o positivismo, que p?ra perante os fen?menos e diz: 'H? apenas
fatos', eu digo: 'Ao contr?rio, fatos ? o que n?o h?; h? apenas
interpreta??es'. "(Nietzsche)

From stefanwilkens at gmail.com  Fri Jan 27 18:37:37 2012
From: stefanwilkens at gmail.com (Stefan Wilkens)
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:37:37 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] removal request:
	gnome-shell-extension-remove-acessibility-icon
In-Reply-To: <CAJa2Z+5WdrV8VGFA44+CJei44Riqvi2pq_yngPtrbweb8OMXsw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJa2Z+5WdrV8VGFA44+CJei44Riqvi2pq_yngPtrbweb8OMXsw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CA+4o_oHRXdWb-sk3j2fPWCPmtbDbejh2HOeK0i=8E6RFB4mqhg@mail.gmail.com>

2012/1/28 Elder Marco <eldermarco at gmail.com>:
> Hello,
>
> I adopted gnome-shell-extension-noa11y[1]. ?I'm also the maintainer of the
> gnome-shell-extension-remove-accessibility-icon[2]. Those packages have the
> same functionality and we don't need two packages for removing the
> accessibility icon. I prefer the first one.
>
> So, could ?you remove gnome-shell-extension-remove-accessibility-icon[2]?
>
> [1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49647
> [2] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51523
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Elder Marco
>
> GNU/Linux User: #471180
>
> "Contra o positivismo, que p?ra perante os fen?menos e diz: 'H? apenas
> fatos', eu digo: 'Ao contr?rio, fatos ? o que n?o h?; h? apenas
> interpreta??es'. "(Nietzsche)

Hi,

It doesn't seem to be the same plugin, both have different authors.
Given how some of these extensions randomly end up unmaintained, I
think there's value in keeping both in the AUR.

If maintaining both is a burden, just drop the one you don't want and
somebody will pick it up. If not, I will.

From eldermarco at gmail.com  Fri Jan 27 18:50:05 2012
From: eldermarco at gmail.com (Elder Marco)
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:50:05 -0200
Subject: [aur-general] removal request:
	gnome-shell-extension-remove-acessibility-icon
In-Reply-To: <CA+4o_oHRXdWb-sk3j2fPWCPmtbDbejh2HOeK0i=8E6RFB4mqhg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJa2Z+5WdrV8VGFA44+CJei44Riqvi2pq_yngPtrbweb8OMXsw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+4o_oHRXdWb-sk3j2fPWCPmtbDbejh2HOeK0i=8E6RFB4mqhg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJa2Z+6pRxzUJNp7SS-89t-5fzF2pvV6W4BbkBG-qO-Mue95Jw@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Stefan Wilkens <stefanwi... at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> It doesn't seem to be the same plugin, both have different authors.
> Given how some of these extensions randomly end up unmaintained, I
> think there's value in keeping both in the AUR.
>
> If maintaining both is a burden, just drop the one you don't want and
> somebody will pick it up. If not, I will.
>

Hmmm, it's truth! You're right. There's a value in keeping both in the AUR.
It's not a burden, I can maintain them.

Thanks.

-- 
Elder Marco

GNU/Linux User: #471180

"Contra o positivismo, que p?ra perante os fen?menos e diz: 'H? apenas
fatos', eu digo: 'Ao contr?rio, fatos ? o que n?o h?; h? apenas
interpreta??es'. "(Nietzsche)

From nobody at archlinux.org  Sat Jan 28 04:07:04 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 09:07:04 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120128090704.22609.69812@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) ==

* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. allan - 2 signoffs


From chrissakalis at gmail.com  Sat Jan 28 08:25:48 2012
From: chrissakalis at gmail.com (Chris Sakalis)
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:25:48 +0200
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: conky-nvidia-git
Message-ID: <CABe=47uDNSBSSBabJb-VAoS+fX-E7YxgSKaX9vOQ8tHaUMbSsA@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,
please remove my package conky-nvidia-git [1]. I only created it
because a user asked me to, but eventually we solved the problem in
conky-nvidia, which is much more stable.

Thank you,
Chris Sakalis

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56100

From julien.nicoulaud at gmail.com  Sat Jan 28 09:51:46 2012
From: julien.nicoulaud at gmail.com (Julien Nicoulaud)
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:51:46 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Please orphan "sickbeard" package
Message-ID: <CA+mcLN5-khjh+XYteQ-_V0vpuV7AEg7m7QC-ntDvjFxqJVFXWg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

sickbeard package (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38028) has
been marked as obsolete for 20 days and maintainer was asked to orphan it,
without any answer. Is it possible to orphan it ?

Regards,
Julien

From evangelos at foutrelis.com  Sat Jan 28 11:23:51 2012
From: evangelos at foutrelis.com (Evangelos Foutras)
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:23:51 +0200
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: conky-nvidia-git
In-Reply-To: <CABe=47uDNSBSSBabJb-VAoS+fX-E7YxgSKaX9vOQ8tHaUMbSsA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABe=47uDNSBSSBabJb-VAoS+fX-E7YxgSKaX9vOQ8tHaUMbSsA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAA407mwEfMDN6YYjQ8Ns9tjHrMheJhp7Oj_5p_=1njJH+EwMxQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Chris Sakalis <chrissakalis at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> please remove my package conky-nvidia-git [1]. I only created it
> because a user asked me to, but eventually we solved the problem in
> conky-nvidia, which is much more stable.

Removed, thanks.

From evangelos at foutrelis.com  Sat Jan 28 11:25:23 2012
From: evangelos at foutrelis.com (Evangelos Foutras)
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:25:23 +0200
Subject: [aur-general] Please orphan "sickbeard" package
In-Reply-To: <CA+mcLN5-khjh+XYteQ-_V0vpuV7AEg7m7QC-ntDvjFxqJVFXWg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+mcLN5-khjh+XYteQ-_V0vpuV7AEg7m7QC-ntDvjFxqJVFXWg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAA407mxqLjqSPr7isZY8nn+a4A35xOS3OD7cjpz34dmBaZJaTw@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Julien Nicoulaud
<julien.nicoulaud at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sickbeard package (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38028) has
> been marked as obsolete for 20 days and maintainer was asked to orphan it,
> without any answer. Is it possible to orphan it ?

Done, thanks.

From rodseth at gmail.com  Sat Jan 28 11:28:38 2012
From: rodseth at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alexander_R=F8dseth?=)
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 17:28:38 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Please orphan "sickbeard" package
In-Reply-To: <CA+mcLN5-khjh+XYteQ-_V0vpuV7AEg7m7QC-ntDvjFxqJVFXWg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+mcLN5-khjh+XYteQ-_V0vpuV7AEg7m7QC-ntDvjFxqJVFXWg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAG7ayyuaHSKj8WJDjsZTcYZxD1QGeRV1tdp6YD8fSKQorxs6SQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Thanks for noticing and for trying to contact the maintainer first. Orphaned.

-- 
Cordially,
?Alexander R?dseth
?Arch Linux Trusted User
?(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

From rodseth at gmail.com  Sat Jan 28 11:30:11 2012
From: rodseth at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alexander_R=F8dseth?=)
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 17:30:11 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Please orphan "sickbeard" package
In-Reply-To: <CAG7ayyuaHSKj8WJDjsZTcYZxD1QGeRV1tdp6YD8fSKQorxs6SQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+mcLN5-khjh+XYteQ-_V0vpuV7AEg7m7QC-ntDvjFxqJVFXWg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAG7ayyuaHSKj8WJDjsZTcYZxD1QGeRV1tdp6YD8fSKQorxs6SQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAG7ayyuSg91EgsDLFmJy7aDjm=Dr1LNNUABZQHf5d+7aS=-A-A@mail.gmail.com>

Evangelos was quicker than me. :)

- Alexander

From stefan-husmann at t-online.de  Sat Jan 28 14:25:08 2012
From: stefan-husmann at t-online.de (Stefan Husmann)
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:25:08 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] A package looks not maintained anymore
In-Reply-To: <op.v8pg07bwtob0l5@localhost.localdomain>
References: <CAFm0kZoDsNLaeT-Rr8xkTZSG3k87Sg-cxO+zVtHfcv3Lz8F4GA@mail.gmail.com>
 <op.v8pg07bwtob0l5@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <4F244B94.1020008@t-online.de>

Am 26.01.2012 20:13, schrieb Philip M?ller:
> flag as outdated and post a link to your PKGBUILD in a comment on the package.
>
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:12:22 +0100, Fabien Devaux <fdev31 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> first, I'm quite new to archlinux so I'm still learning the basics...
>> The "snaked-git" package at
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42305 looks
>> updated,
>> I tried to contact package's author without any success.
>>
>> I own an updated version of the PKGBUILD file with proper content, but I'm
>> not the owner.
>>
>> How should I proceed ? Shall I just click "outdated" in the web form ?
>>
>> Thanks for your help,
>> Fabien Devaux.
>>
>
>
>
Hello,

sorry for my late 2 cents, but I think flagging-out-of-date should only be used
if the package really is out of date, which cannot be the case for git-packages.
A comment with the correct PKGBUILD should be enough for now. However, there are
different opinions about that.

Btw. the maintainer of snaked-git did not incorporate suggestions made in the
AUR comments, did he? If not, it could be avisable to write a PM withe the link
to the PKGBUILD to him.

Best Regards Stefan.

From mathieuivi at gmail.com  Sat Jan 28 20:09:41 2012
From: mathieuivi at gmail.com (Mathieu Pasquet)
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 02:09:41 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Deletion of poezio-hg
Message-ID: <4F249C55.7060001@gmail.com>

Hello,
Can someone please delete the poezio-hg package?

I orphaned it, and it has been obsolete for several months (we switched
to git).


Thanks.

From rodseth at gmail.com  Sat Jan 28 20:19:44 2012
From: rodseth at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alexander_R=F8dseth?=)
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 02:19:44 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Deletion of poezio-hg
In-Reply-To: <4F249C55.7060001@gmail.com>
References: <4F249C55.7060001@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAG7ayyvcXqhoFtu0rBtHo0cGjZsSc6WzgjqN+NLcMygidYzj-w@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Incinerated. Thanks.

-- 
Cordially,
?Alexander R?dseth
?Arch Linux Trusted User
?(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

From nobody at archlinux.org  Sun Jan 29 04:07:04 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:07:04 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120129090704.17448.28016@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) ==

* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. allan - 1 signoffs


From mail.avatar at gmail.com  Sun Jan 29 13:02:03 2012
From: mail.avatar at gmail.com (Aliaksandr Stelmachonak)
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 13:02:03 -0500
Subject: [aur-general] Remove request: kwinbuttonapplet-improved
Message-ID: <CAHyN5O64txkjMr_-iO941vXGjcpwcqkW=TK+RuTb9x+QGwWWwA@mail.gmail.com>

Hello!

Can you please remove this package, I uploaded few days ago. Looks like
there is another package exists
(kdeplasma-addons-applet-kwin-button-improved), which is up to date now and
follows the naming convention for plasma applets in arch.

Thanks,
Alex

From george+arch.aur at george-brooke.co.uk  Sun Jan 29 13:31:05 2012
From: george+arch.aur at george-brooke.co.uk (George Brooke)
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:31:05 +0000
Subject: [aur-general] Remove request: kwinbuttonapplet-improved
In-Reply-To: <CAHyN5O64txkjMr_-iO941vXGjcpwcqkW=TK+RuTb9x+QGwWWwA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHyN5O64txkjMr_-iO941vXGjcpwcqkW=TK+RuTb9x+QGwWWwA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1574675.v1zFNn08SJ@george-thinkpad>

On Sunday 29 January 2012 13:02:03 Aliaksandr Stelmachonak wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> Can you please remove this package, I uploaded few days ago. Looks like
> there is another package exists
> (kdeplasma-addons-applet-kwin-button-improved), which is up to date now and
> follows the naming convention for plasma applets in arch.
> 
> Thanks,
> Alex
PKGBUILD links:

To be removed;
kwinbuttonapplet-improved: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56160
Due to existing package;
kdeplasma-addons-applet-kwin-button-improved: 
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55898

GeorgeB

From julien.nicoulaud at gmail.com  Sun Jan 29 13:52:36 2012
From: julien.nicoulaud at gmail.com (Julien Nicoulaud)
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 19:52:36 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Please orphan "sickbeard" package
In-Reply-To: <CAG7ayyuSg91EgsDLFmJy7aDjm=Dr1LNNUABZQHf5d+7aS=-A-A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+mcLN5-khjh+XYteQ-_V0vpuV7AEg7m7QC-ntDvjFxqJVFXWg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAG7ayyuaHSKj8WJDjsZTcYZxD1QGeRV1tdp6YD8fSKQorxs6SQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAG7ayyuSg91EgsDLFmJy7aDjm=Dr1LNNUABZQHf5d+7aS=-A-A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CA+mcLN46e4o58UOAGP0RCe2wcv+m+k15HZKAn=5JyQHgoAUn9Q@mail.gmail.com>

Adopted, thanks to both of you :)

Julien

2012/1/28 Alexander R?dseth <rodseth at gmail.com>

> Evangelos was quicker than me. :)
>
> - Alexander
>

From nobody at archlinux.org  Mon Jan 30 04:07:04 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:07:04 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120130090704.28248.6931@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 1 package older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) ==

* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) ==

* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. dan - 5 signoffs
2. bisson - 2 signoffs
3. dreisner - 2 signoffs
4. ibiru - 1 signoffs
5. thomas - 1 signoffs


From knizek.confy at gmail.com  Mon Jan 30 14:03:57 2012
From: knizek.confy at gmail.com (Milan =?UTF-8?B?S27DrcW+ZWs=?=)
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:03:57 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: x2goclient-gtk x2goclient-cli
	x2goserver-one
Message-ID: <20120130200357.3c1c8b51@athlon.garagome>

Hello,

x2goclient-gtk[1], x2goclient-cli[2] and x2goserver-one[3] are
orphaned, do not exist upstream and have been replaced by "x2goclient"
and "x2goserver" respectively. The two last packages exist in AUR and
are up-to-date.

Can they get removed from AUR?

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25147
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26765
[3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31223

regards,
Milan

-- 
http://www.milan-knizek.net/
About linux and photography (Czech only)
O linuxu a fotografov?n?

From darkelfdarkelf666 at yahoo.co.uk  Mon Jan 30 16:08:52 2012
From: darkelfdarkelf666 at yahoo.co.uk (Jagmjp Janpgm)
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:08:52 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [aur-general] Package renaming
Message-ID: <1327957732.85221.YahooMailNeo@web28602.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>

Could you rename https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16531 to bin32-wine-snapshot as there's no reason for anyone to install the stable version and i'm going to maintain the snapshot version?

From rodseth at gmail.com  Mon Jan 30 17:31:24 2012
From: rodseth at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alexander_R=F8dseth?=)
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:31:24 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Package renaming
In-Reply-To: <1327957732.85221.YahooMailNeo@web28602.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
References: <1327957732.85221.YahooMailNeo@web28602.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <CAG7ayysGdbfiCdLHt0kwnAQqnzQbY1sXQVxUujvYkF-s4nnVAw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Renamed (by uploading a dummy bin32-wine-snapshot package and
deleting/merging bin32-wine-suse into bin32-wine-snapshot).

The disowned bin32-wine-snapshot:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56241

-- 
Best regards,
?Alexander R?dseth
?Arch Linux Trusted User
?(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

From rodseth at gmail.com  Mon Jan 30 17:34:06 2012
From: rodseth at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alexander_R=F8dseth?=)
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:34:06 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: x2goclient-gtk x2goclient-cli
	x2goserver-one
In-Reply-To: <20120130200357.3c1c8b51@athlon.garagome>
References: <20120130200357.3c1c8b51@athlon.garagome>
Message-ID: <CAG7ayysCmbhQjMfGrw=1j8MRuoVwQFQH6Aa9VE9WV4=BZ+jLgA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Disintegrated. Thanks.

-- 
Cordially,
?Alexander R?dseth
?Arch Linux Trusted User
?(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

From nobody at archlinux.org  Tue Jan 31 04:07:06 2012
From: nobody at archlinux.org (Arch Website Notification)
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:07:06 -0000
Subject: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
Message-ID: <20120131090706.8381.59321@gerolde.archlinux.org>

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 295 new packages in last 24 hours
* 1 known bad package
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 296 packages missing signoffs
* 2 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (295 total) ==

* torcs-data-1.3.2-1 (any)
* ario-1.5.1-2 (i686)
* armagetronad-0.2.8.3.1-3 (i686)
* blender-3:2.61-4 (i686)
* bwbar-1.2.3-3 (i686)
* calibre-0.8.37-2 (i686)
* caph-1.1-2 (i686)
* cinelerra-cv-1:2.2-5 (i686)
* clanlib-2.3.4-2 (i686)
* compiz-0.8.8-3 (i686)
* coq-8.3pl3-2 (i686)
* critter-1.0.2-6 (i686)
* cwiid-0.6.00-10 (i686)
* darktable-0.9.3-5 (i686)
* devil-1.7.8-10 (i686)
* dia-0.97.2-2 (i686)
* dillo-3.0.2-2 (i686)
* directfb-1.4.14-2 (i686)
* djview4-4.8-2 (i686)
* dosbox-0.74-3 (i686)
* efax-gtk-3.2.9-2 (i686)
* emerald-0.8.8-2 (i686)
* evas-svn-66901-2 (i686)
* extremetuxracer-0.4-3 (i686)
* fbgrab-1.0-6 (i686)
* fbreader-0.12.10-3 (i686)
* fbshot-0.3-4 (i686)
* fbv-1.0b-5 (i686)
* fityk-1.1.1-4 (i686)
* flam3-3.0.1-2 (i686)
* flowcanvas-0.7.1-3 (i686)
* fltk2-2.0-8 (i686)
* fox-1.6.44-2 (i686)
* freedroidrpg-0.15-2 (i686)
* freewrl-1.22.10-8 (i686)
* frogatto-1.2-2 (i686)
* fxdesktop-0.1.12-5 (i686)
* fxprocessview-0.5.0-4 (i686)
* gambas2-2.23.1-7 (i686)
* gambas3-3.0.0-3 (i686)
* gdal-1.9.0-1 (i686)
* gdk-pixbuf-0.22.0-9 (i686)
* geda-gaf-1.6.2-2 (i686)
* gimp-plugin-mathmap-1.3.5-2 (i686)
* gimp-plugin-wavelet-decompose-0.1.2-2 (i686)
* gliv-1.9.7-2 (i686)
* glpng-1.45-5 (i686)
* gmerlin-1.0.0-5 (i686)
* gmerlin-avdecoder-1.1.0-4 (i686)
* gmic-1.5.0.8-2 (i686)
* gnash-0.8.9-9 (i686)
* gnubiff-gtk-2.2.14-1 (i686)
* gnustep-gui-0.20.0-3 (i686)
* gpac-3824-2 (i686)
* gpsim-0.26.1-2 (i686)
* grace-5.1.22-6 (i686)
* grafx2-2.3-3 (i686)
* gsql-0.2.2-4 (i686)
* gtk-chtheme-0.3.1-7 (i686)
* gtk-engine-murrine-0.98.1.1-3 (i686)
* guake-0.4.2-5 (i686)
* handbrake-0.9.5-3 (i686)
* hardinfo-0.5.1-4 (i686)
* hatari-1.5.0-2 (i686)
* htmldoc-1.8.27-7 (i686)
* icoutils-0.29.1-2 (i686)
* irrlicht-1.7.2-4 (i686)
* jwm-2.1.0-2 (i686)
* kovpn-0.3pre7-6 (i686)
* leptonica-1.68-3 (i686)
* libgeotiff-1.3.0-2 (i686)
* libgtksourceviewmm2-2.10.1-2 (i686)
* libharu-2.2.1-2 (i686)
* libinfinity-0.5.1-3 (i686)
* libmatchbox-1.9-5 (i686)
* libquicktime-1.2.3-3 (i686)
* luakit-2011.07.22-3 (i686)
* luminancehdr-2.1.0-7 (i686)
* luxrender-0.8-12 (i686)
* mapnik-0.7.1-13 (i686)
* megaglest-3.6.0.2-2 (i686)
* metapixel-1.0.2-3 (i686)
* mldonkey-3.1.0-2 (i686)
* mplayer-vaapi-34578-2 (i686)
* mtpaint-3.40-2 (i686)
* mupen64plus-1.99.4-3 (i686)
* mypaint-1.0.0-2 (i686)
* naev-0.5.0-2 (i686)
* nestopia-1.40h-5 (i686)
* netsurf-2.8-3 (i686)
* nvclock-0.8b4-3 (i686)
* ogmrip-0.13.7-3 (i686)
* openimageio-0.10.4-5 (i686)
* openmotif-2.3.3-2 (i686)
* openscenegraph-3.0.1-4 (i686)
* openttd-1.1.5-1 (i686)
* paraview-3.12.0-3 (i686)
* patchage-0.5.0-3 (i686)
* performous-0.6.1-12 (i686)
* perl-gnome2-wnck-0.16-5 (i686)
* perl-gtk2-sexy-0.05-6 (i686)
* perl-gtk2-trayicon-0.06-8 (i686)
* perl-gtk2-webkit-0.09-2 (i686)
* pidgin-libnotify-0.14-5 (i686)
* pingus-0.7.6-2 (i686)
* png2ico-20021208-5 (i686)
* podofo-0.9.1-3 (i686)
* prboom-2.5.0-6 (i686)
* pyqt3-3.18.1-10 (i686)
* python-galago-gtk-0.5.0-6 (i686)
* python2-matplotlib-1.1.0-2 (i686)
* qcad-2.0.5.0-9 (i686)
* qpxtool-0.7.1_002-3 (i686)
* rawstudio-2.0-5 (i686)
* rawtherapee-4.0.6-2 (i686)
* remmina-plugins-0.9.2-3 (i686)
* root-5.32.00-3 (i686)
* sage-mathematics-4.7.2-3 (i686)
* scantailor-0.9.10-2 (i686)
* scorched3d-43.2a-2 (i686)
* scummvm-tools-1.4.0-2 (i686)
* silly-0.1.0-5 (i686)
* smc-1.9-14 (i686)
* snes9x-1.53-3 (i686)
* speed-dreams-2.0.0b1-2 (i686)
* synfig-0.63.03-2 (i686)
* ted-2.21-4 (i686)
* tmw-0.5.2-2 (i686)
* torcs-1.3.2-1 (i686)
* tuxpaint-0.9.21-5 (i686)
* tvtime-1.0.2-3 (i686)
* virtualbox-4.1.8-2 (i686)
* virtviewer-0.4.1-2 (i686)
* visualboyadvance-1.7.2-9 (i686)
* vtk-5.8.0-8 (i686)
* w3cam-0.7.2-10 (i686)
* warmux-11.04.1-4 (i686)
* warzone2100-2.3.9-2 (i686)
* widelands-16-5 (i686)
* xautomation-1.05-2 (i686)
* xbmc-10.1-14 (i686)
* xemacs-21.5.31-5 (i686)
* xloadimage-4.1-12 (i686)
* xmoto-0.5.9-1 (i686)
* xnc-5.0.4-6 (i686)
* xplanet-1.2.2-2 (i686)
* xv-3.10a-15 (i686)
* ario-1.5.1-2 (x86_64)
* armagetronad-0.2.8.3.1-3 (x86_64)
* blender-3:2.61-4 (x86_64)
* bwbar-1.2.3-3 (x86_64)
* calibre-0.8.37-2 (x86_64)
* caph-1.1-2 (x86_64)
* cinelerra-cv-1:2.2-5 (x86_64)
* clanlib-2.3.4-2 (x86_64)
* compiz-0.8.8-3 (x86_64)
* coq-8.3pl3-2 (x86_64)
* critter-1.0.2-6 (x86_64)
* cwiid-0.6.00-10 (x86_64)
* darktable-0.9.3-5 (x86_64)
* devil-1.7.8-10 (x86_64)
* dia-0.97.2-2 (x86_64)
* dillo-3.0.2-2 (x86_64)
* directfb-1.4.14-2 (x86_64)
* djview4-4.8-2 (x86_64)
* dosbox-0.74-3 (x86_64)
* efax-gtk-3.2.9-2 (x86_64)
* emerald-0.8.8-2 (x86_64)
* evas-svn-66901-2 (x86_64)
* extremetuxracer-0.4-3 (x86_64)
* fbgrab-1.0-6 (x86_64)
* fbreader-0.12.10-3 (x86_64)
* fbshot-0.3-4 (x86_64)
* fbv-1.0b-5 (x86_64)
* fityk-1.1.1-4 (x86_64)
* flam3-3.0.1-2 (x86_64)
* flowcanvas-0.7.1-3 (x86_64)
* fltk2-2.0-8 (x86_64)
* fox-1.6.44-2 (x86_64)
* freedroidrpg-0.15-2 (x86_64)
* freewrl-1.22.10-8 (x86_64)
* frogatto-1.2-2 (x86_64)
* fxdesktop-0.1.12-5 (x86_64)
* fxprocessview-0.5.0-4 (x86_64)
* gambas2-2.23.1-7 (x86_64)
* gambas3-3.0.0-3 (x86_64)
* gdal-1.9.0-1 (x86_64)
* gdk-pixbuf-0.22.0-9 (x86_64)
* geda-gaf-1.6.2-2 (x86_64)
* gimp-plugin-mathmap-1.3.5-2 (x86_64)
* gimp-plugin-wavelet-decompose-0.1.2-2 (x86_64)
* gliv-1.9.7-2 (x86_64)
* glpng-1.45-5 (x86_64)
* gmerlin-1.0.0-5 (x86_64)
* gmerlin-avdecoder-1.1.0-4 (x86_64)
* gmic-1.5.0.8-2 (x86_64)
* gnash-0.8.9-9 (x86_64)
* gnubiff-gtk-2.2.14-1 (x86_64)
* gnustep-gui-0.20.0-3 (x86_64)
* gpac-3824-2 (x86_64)
* gpsim-0.26.1-2 (x86_64)
* grace-5.1.22-6 (x86_64)
* grafx2-2.3-3 (x86_64)
* gsql-0.2.2-4 (x86_64)
* gtk-chtheme-0.3.1-7 (x86_64)
* gtk-engine-murrine-0.98.1.1-3 (x86_64)
* guake-0.4.2-5 (x86_64)
* handbrake-0.9.5-3 (x86_64)
* hardinfo-0.5.1-4 (x86_64)
* hatari-1.5.0-2 (x86_64)
* htmldoc-1.8.27-7 (x86_64)
* icoutils-0.29.1-2 (x86_64)
* irrlicht-1.7.2-4 (x86_64)
* jwm-2.1.0-2 (x86_64)
* kovpn-0.3pre7-6 (x86_64)
* leptonica-1.68-3 (x86_64)
* libgeotiff-1.3.0-2 (x86_64)
* libgtksourceviewmm2-2.10.1-2 (x86_64)
* libharu-2.2.1-2 (x86_64)
* libinfinity-0.5.1-3 (x86_64)
* libmatchbox-1.9-5 (x86_64)
* libquicktime-1.2.3-3 (x86_64)
* luakit-2011.07.22-3 (x86_64)
* luminancehdr-2.1.0-7 (x86_64)
* luxrender-0.8-12 (x86_64)
* mapnik-0.7.1-13 (x86_64)
* megaglest-3.6.0.2-2 (x86_64)
* metapixel-1.0.2-3 (x86_64)
* mldonkey-3.1.0-2 (x86_64)
* mplayer-vaapi-34578-2 (x86_64)
* mtpaint-3.40-2 (x86_64)
* mupen64plus-1.99.4-3 (x86_64)
* mypaint-1.0.0-2 (x86_64)
* naev-0.5.0-2 (x86_64)
* nestopia-1.40h-5 (x86_64)
* netsurf-2.8-3 (x86_64)
* nvclock-0.8b4-3 (x86_64)
* ogmrip-0.13.7-3 (x86_64)
* openimageio-0.10.4-5 (x86_64)
* openmotif-2.3.3-2 (x86_64)
* openscenegraph-3.0.1-4 (x86_64)
* openttd-1.1.5-1 (x86_64)
* paraview-3.12.0-3 (x86_64)
* patchage-0.5.0-3 (x86_64)
* performous-0.6.1-12 (x86_64)
* perl-gnome2-wnck-0.16-5 (x86_64)
* perl-gtk2-sexy-0.05-6 (x86_64)
* perl-gtk2-trayicon-0.06-8 (x86_64)
* perl-gtk2-webkit-0.09-2 (x86_64)
* pidgin-libnotify-0.14-5 (x86_64)
* pingus-0.7.6-2 (x86_64)
* png2ico-20021208-5 (x86_64)
* podofo-0.9.1-3 (x86_64)
* prboom-2.5.0-6 (x86_64)
* pyqt3-3.18.1-10 (x86_64)
* python-galago-gtk-0.5.0-6 (x86_64)
* python2-matplotlib-1.1.0-2 (x86_64)
* qcad-2.0.5.0-9 (x86_64)
* qpxtool-0.7.1_002-3 (x86_64)
* rawstudio-2.0-5 (x86_64)
* rawtherapee-4.0.6-2 (x86_64)
* remmina-plugins-0.9.2-3 (x86_64)
* root-5.32.00-3 (x86_64)
* sage-mathematics-4.7.2-3 (x86_64)
* scantailor-0.9.10-2 (x86_64)
* scorched3d-43.2a-2 (x86_64)
* scummvm-tools-1.4.0-2 (x86_64)
* silly-0.1.0-5 (x86_64)
* smc-1.9-14 (x86_64)
* snes9x-1.53-3 (x86_64)
* speed-dreams-2.0.0b1-2 (x86_64)
* synfig-0.63.03-2 (x86_64)
* ted-2.21-4 (x86_64)
* tmw-0.5.2-2 (x86_64)
* torcs-1.3.2-1 (x86_64)
* tuxpaint-0.9.21-5 (x86_64)
* tvtime-1.0.2-3 (x86_64)
* virtualbox-4.1.8-2 (x86_64)
* virtviewer-0.4.1-2 (x86_64)
* visualboyadvance-1.7.2-9 (x86_64)
* vtk-5.8.0-8 (x86_64)
* w3cam-0.7.2-10 (x86_64)
* warmux-11.04.1-4 (x86_64)
* warzone2100-2.3.9-2 (x86_64)
* widelands-16-5 (x86_64)
* xautomation-1.05-2 (x86_64)
* xbmc-10.1-14 (x86_64)
* xemacs-21.5.31-5 (x86_64)
* xloadimage-4.1-12 (x86_64)
* xmoto-0.5.9-1 (x86_64)
* xnc-5.0.4-6 (x86_64)
* xplanet-1.2.2-2 (x86_64)
* xv-3.10a-15 (x86_64)
* wine-1.4rc1-1 (i686)
* zsnes-1.51-11 (i686)


== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (294 total) ==

* torcs-data-1.3.2-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* ario-1.5.1-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* armagetronad-0.2.8.3.1-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* blender-3:2.61-4 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* bwbar-1.2.3-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* calibre-0.8.37-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* caph-1.1-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* cinelerra-cv-1:2.2-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* clanlib-2.3.4-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* compiz-0.8.8-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* coq-8.3pl3-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* critter-1.0.2-6 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* cwiid-0.6.00-10 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* darktable-0.9.3-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* devil-1.7.8-10 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* dia-0.97.2-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* dillo-3.0.2-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* directfb-1.4.14-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* djview4-4.8-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* dosbox-0.74-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* efax-gtk-3.2.9-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* emerald-0.8.8-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* evas-svn-66901-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* extremetuxracer-0.4-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* fbgrab-1.0-6 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* fbreader-0.12.10-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* fbshot-0.3-4 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* fbv-1.0b-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* fityk-1.1.1-4 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* flam3-3.0.1-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* flowcanvas-0.7.1-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* fltk2-2.0-8 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* fox-1.6.44-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* freedroidrpg-0.15-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* freewrl-1.22.10-8 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* frogatto-1.2-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* fxdesktop-0.1.12-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* fxprocessview-0.5.0-4 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gambas2-2.23.1-7 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gambas3-3.0.0-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gdal-1.9.0-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gdk-pixbuf-0.22.0-9 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* geda-gaf-1.6.2-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gimp-plugin-mathmap-1.3.5-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gimp-plugin-wavelet-decompose-0.1.2-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gliv-1.9.7-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* glpng-1.45-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gmerlin-1.0.0-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gmerlin-avdecoder-1.1.0-4 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gmic-1.5.0.8-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gnash-0.8.9-9 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gnubiff-gtk-2.2.14-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gnustep-gui-0.20.0-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gpac-3824-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gpsim-0.26.1-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* grace-5.1.22-6 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* grafx2-2.3-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gsql-0.2.2-4 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gtk-chtheme-0.3.1-7 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* gtk-engine-murrine-0.98.1.1-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* guake-0.4.2-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* handbrake-0.9.5-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* hardinfo-0.5.1-4 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* hatari-1.5.0-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* htmldoc-1.8.27-7 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* icoutils-0.29.1-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* irrlicht-1.7.2-4 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* jwm-2.1.0-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* kovpn-0.3pre7-6 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* leptonica-1.68-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* libgeotiff-1.3.0-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* libgtksourceviewmm2-2.10.1-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* libharu-2.2.1-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* libinfinity-0.5.1-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* libmatchbox-1.9-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* libquicktime-1.2.3-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* luakit-2011.07.22-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* luminancehdr-2.1.0-7 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* luxrender-0.8-12 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* mapnik-0.7.1-13 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* megaglest-3.6.0.2-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* metapixel-1.0.2-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* mldonkey-3.1.0-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* mplayer-vaapi-34578-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* mtpaint-3.40-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* mupen64plus-1.99.4-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* mypaint-1.0.0-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* naev-0.5.0-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* nestopia-1.40h-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* netsurf-2.8-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* nvclock-0.8b4-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* ogmrip-0.13.7-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* openimageio-0.10.4-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* openmotif-2.3.3-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* openscenegraph-3.0.1-4 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* openttd-1.1.5-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* paraview-3.12.0-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* patchage-0.5.0-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* performous-0.6.1-12 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* perl-gnome2-wnck-0.16-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* perl-gtk2-sexy-0.05-6 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* perl-gtk2-trayicon-0.06-8 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* perl-gtk2-webkit-0.09-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* pidgin-libnotify-0.14-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* pingus-0.7.6-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* png2ico-20021208-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* podofo-0.9.1-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* prboom-2.5.0-6 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* pyqt3-3.18.1-10 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* python-galago-gtk-0.5.0-6 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* python2-matplotlib-1.1.0-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* qcad-2.0.5.0-9 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* qpxtool-0.7.1_002-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* rawstudio-2.0-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* rawtherapee-4.0.6-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* remmina-plugins-0.9.2-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* root-5.32.00-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* sage-mathematics-4.7.2-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* scantailor-0.9.10-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* scorched3d-43.2a-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* scummvm-tools-1.4.0-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* silly-0.1.0-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* smc-1.9-14 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* snes9x-1.53-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* speed-dreams-2.0.0b1-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* synfig-0.63.03-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* ted-2.21-4 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* tmw-0.5.2-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* torcs-1.3.2-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* tuxpaint-0.9.21-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* tvtime-1.0.2-3 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-4.1.8-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* virtviewer-0.4.1-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* visualboyadvance-1.7.2-9 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* vtk-5.8.0-8 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* w3cam-0.7.2-10 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* warmux-11.04.1-4 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* warzone2100-2.3.9-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* widelands-16-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* xautomation-1.05-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* xbmc-10.1-14 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* xemacs-21.5.31-5 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* xloadimage-4.1-12 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* xmoto-0.5.9-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* xnc-5.0.4-6 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* xplanet-1.2.2-2 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* xv-3.10a-15 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* ario-1.5.1-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* armagetronad-0.2.8.3.1-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* blender-3:2.61-4 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* bwbar-1.2.3-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* calibre-0.8.37-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* caph-1.1-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* cinelerra-cv-1:2.2-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* clanlib-2.3.4-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* compiz-0.8.8-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* coq-8.3pl3-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* critter-1.0.2-6 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* cwiid-0.6.00-10 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* darktable-0.9.3-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* devil-1.7.8-10 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* dia-0.97.2-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* dillo-3.0.2-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* djview4-4.8-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* dosbox-0.74-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* efax-gtk-3.2.9-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* emerald-0.8.8-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* evas-svn-66901-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* extremetuxracer-0.4-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* fbgrab-1.0-6 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* fbreader-0.12.10-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* fbshot-0.3-4 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* fbv-1.0b-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* fityk-1.1.1-4 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* flam3-3.0.1-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* flowcanvas-0.7.1-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* fltk2-2.0-8 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* fox-1.6.44-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* freedroidrpg-0.15-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* freewrl-1.22.10-8 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* frogatto-1.2-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* fxdesktop-0.1.12-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* fxprocessview-0.5.0-4 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* gambas2-2.23.1-7 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* gambas3-3.0.0-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* gdal-1.9.0-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* gdk-pixbuf-0.22.0-9 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* geda-gaf-1.6.2-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* gimp-plugin-mathmap-1.3.5-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* gimp-plugin-wavelet-decompose-0.1.2-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* gliv-1.9.7-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* glpng-1.45-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* gmerlin-1.0.0-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* gmerlin-avdecoder-1.1.0-4 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* gmic-1.5.0.8-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* gnash-0.8.9-9 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* gnubiff-gtk-2.2.14-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* gnustep-gui-0.20.0-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* gpac-3824-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* gpsim-0.26.1-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* grace-5.1.22-6 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* grafx2-2.3-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* gsql-0.2.2-4 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* gtk-chtheme-0.3.1-7 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* gtk-engine-murrine-0.98.1.1-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* guake-0.4.2-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* handbrake-0.9.5-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* hardinfo-0.5.1-4 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* hatari-1.5.0-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* htmldoc-1.8.27-7 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* icoutils-0.29.1-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* irrlicht-1.7.2-4 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* jwm-2.1.0-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* kovpn-0.3pre7-6 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* leptonica-1.68-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* libgeotiff-1.3.0-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* libgtksourceviewmm2-2.10.1-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* libharu-2.2.1-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* libinfinity-0.5.1-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* libmatchbox-1.9-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* libquicktime-1.2.3-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* luakit-2011.07.22-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* luminancehdr-2.1.0-7 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* luxrender-0.8-12 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* mapnik-0.7.1-13 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* megaglest-3.6.0.2-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* metapixel-1.0.2-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* mldonkey-3.1.0-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* mplayer-vaapi-34578-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* mtpaint-3.40-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* mupen64plus-1.99.4-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* mypaint-1.0.0-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* naev-0.5.0-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* nestopia-1.40h-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* netsurf-2.8-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* nvclock-0.8b4-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* ogmrip-0.13.7-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* openimageio-0.10.4-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* openmotif-2.3.3-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* openscenegraph-3.0.1-4 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* openttd-1.1.5-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* paraview-3.12.0-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* patchage-0.5.0-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* performous-0.6.1-12 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* perl-gnome2-wnck-0.16-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* perl-gtk2-sexy-0.05-6 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* perl-gtk2-trayicon-0.06-8 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* perl-gtk2-webkit-0.09-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* pidgin-libnotify-0.14-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* pingus-0.7.6-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* png2ico-20021208-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* podofo-0.9.1-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* prboom-2.5.0-6 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* pyqt3-3.18.1-10 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* python-galago-gtk-0.5.0-6 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* python2-matplotlib-1.1.0-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* qcad-2.0.5.0-9 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* qpxtool-0.7.1_002-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* rawstudio-2.0-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* rawtherapee-4.0.6-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* remmina-plugins-0.9.2-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* root-5.32.00-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* sage-mathematics-4.7.2-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* scantailor-0.9.10-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* scorched3d-43.2a-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* scummvm-tools-1.4.0-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* silly-0.1.0-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* smc-1.9-14 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* snes9x-1.53-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* speed-dreams-2.0.0b1-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* synfig-0.63.03-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* ted-2.21-4 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* tmw-0.5.2-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* torcs-1.3.2-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* tuxpaint-0.9.21-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* tvtime-1.0.2-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-4.1.8-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* virtviewer-0.4.1-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* visualboyadvance-1.7.2-9 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* vtk-5.8.0-8 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* w3cam-0.7.2-10 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* warmux-11.04.1-4 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* warzone2100-2.3.9-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* widelands-16-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* xautomation-1.05-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* xbmc-10.1-14 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* xemacs-21.5.31-5 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* xloadimage-4.1-12 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* xmoto-0.5.9-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* xnc-5.0.4-6 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* xplanet-1.2.2-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* xv-3.10a-15 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [multilib] (2 total) ==

* wine-1.4rc1-1 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs
* zsnes-1.51-11 (i686)
    0/2 signoffs


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) ==

* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15
* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. allan - 7 signoffs
2. stephane - 4 signoffs
3. pierre - 2 signoffs
4. ibiru - 2 signoffs


From anton.bazhenov at gmail.com  Tue Jan 31 07:21:23 2012
From: anton.bazhenov at gmail.com (Anton Bazhenov)
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:21:23 +0600
Subject: [aur-general] Orphan request: dark-oberon
Message-ID: <CAAwN+pLiqZnOQgpWBZ9RdrK3u=PKUfiPmfqD6sBonm8N=UnxCQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

could you please orphan the 'dark-oberon' package:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1876

It hasn't been updated since 2006, and doesn't work for a long time. I
e-mailed the maintainer, but he didn't respond.

Best regards,
Anton Bazhenov

From garyvdm at gmail.com  Tue Jan 31 07:50:52 2012
From: garyvdm at gmail.com (Gary van der Merwe)
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:50:52 +0200
Subject: [aur-general] Removal request: python-dbus-bzr
Message-ID: <4F27E3AC.5060009@gmail.com>

Hi

I added https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54635 
(python-dbus-bzr.) Since then, the code is now been maintained in git, 
so I have uploaded python-dbus-git.

Please remove the old pkg - python-dbus-bzr.

Thanks,

Gary

From sanskritfritz at gmail.com  Tue Jan 31 08:03:31 2012
From: sanskritfritz at gmail.com (SanskritFritz)
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:03:31 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Orphan request: dark-oberon
In-Reply-To: <CAAwN+pLiqZnOQgpWBZ9RdrK3u=PKUfiPmfqD6sBonm8N=UnxCQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAwN+pLiqZnOQgpWBZ9RdrK3u=PKUfiPmfqD6sBonm8N=UnxCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAExbbMykme_Gk4Y3f5K7kQTuXk2Z3bzhVZwV8kPJNjsXksCPGA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Anton Bazhenov
<anton.bazhenov at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> could you please orphan the 'dark-oberon' package:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1876
>
> It hasn't been updated since 2006, and doesn't work for a long time. I
> e-mailed the maintainer, but he didn't respond.

Do you have any plans with the package? I am keeping an eye on this
game, I wish it would be developed further, it is so amazing even in
this shape.

From machmalabala at gmail.com  Tue Jan 31 08:14:25 2012
From: machmalabala at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?bsOpbW8=?=)
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:14:25 +0100
Subject: [aur-general]  Removal request : firefox-beta-fr 4.0-1
Message-ID: <CAK-vGs-0PNbTB4vHKd2GcvkTvVqAaGmOWDRGjH+a2aPa+GA2AQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

I'm the owner and maintainer of firefox-beta-bin-fr
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43418
There is an another french package for the beta flagged out of date and
orphan, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39668

Maybe should we remove this pkg?

Thanks !
n?mo

From anton.bazhenov at gmail.com  Tue Jan 31 08:29:07 2012
From: anton.bazhenov at gmail.com (Anton Bazhenov)
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:29:07 +0600
Subject: [aur-general] Orphan request: dark-oberon
In-Reply-To: <CAExbbMykme_Gk4Y3f5K7kQTuXk2Z3bzhVZwV8kPJNjsXksCPGA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAwN+pLiqZnOQgpWBZ9RdrK3u=PKUfiPmfqD6sBonm8N=UnxCQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAExbbMykme_Gk4Y3f5K7kQTuXk2Z3bzhVZwV8kPJNjsXksCPGA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAAwN+p+qfsfMKLmU73ZS_2Jxx7ZpfCnx1yUSxV759umLuR5FJg@mail.gmail.com>

2012/1/31 SanskritFritz <sanskritfritz at gmail.com>

> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Anton Bazhenov
> <anton.bazhenov at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > could you please orphan the 'dark-oberon' package:
> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1876
> >
> > It hasn't been updated since 2006, and doesn't work for a long time. I
> > e-mailed the maintainer, but he didn't respond.
>
> Do you have any plans with the package? I am keeping an eye on this
> game, I wish it would be developed further, it is so amazing even in
> this shape.
>


Yes, I want to upload the new pkgbuild for the latest version (1.0.2 RC2).

As for the game, I agree. It was a really interesting project.

From l.jirkovsky at gmail.com  Tue Jan 31 10:58:03 2012
From: l.jirkovsky at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?THVrw6HFoSBKaXJrb3Zza8O9?=)
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:58:03 +0100
Subject: [aur-general] Orphan request: dark-oberon
In-Reply-To: <CAAwN+pLiqZnOQgpWBZ9RdrK3u=PKUfiPmfqD6sBonm8N=UnxCQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAwN+pLiqZnOQgpWBZ9RdrK3u=PKUfiPmfqD6sBonm8N=UnxCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAFa9FQtTixHMdtMZnzoAeoQPQ8qQOjfxOky0+pbmvSNw5XbboA@mail.gmail.com>

On 31 January 2012 13:21, Anton Bazhenov <anton.bazhenov at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> could you please orphan the 'dark-oberon' package:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1876
>
> It hasn't been updated since 2006, and doesn't work for a long time. I
> e-mailed the maintainer, but he didn't respond.
>
> Best regards,
> Anton Bazhenov

Done