[aur-general] Cleanup request

Luca Bennati lucak3 at gmail.com
Wed Jan 11 13:13:24 EST 2012

2012/1/11 Bartłomiej Piotrowski <barthalion at gmail.com>

> On 01/08/2012 12:11 PM, Luca Bennati wrote:
> > This is the context:
> > gle (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1863) is outdated and
> > orphaned. I prepared a new PKGBUILD, but then I found those other
> packages
> > on AUR:
> > gle-graphics (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31267) also
> > outdated but not orphaned
> > gle4 (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12162) outdated,
> orphaned
> > and a clear dup
> >
> > Now, while it is clear that gle4 should be removed or at least merged, I
> > would like to ask which package between gle and gle-graphics would be
> > merged in the other.
> > Upstream site names it 'GLE', but in some part of the tarball it's called
> > 'gle-graphics'.
> > What is the official stance?
> I've merged gle4 botes with gle.
> Gle-graphics doesn't seem to be out-of-date for me. Anyway, I would keep
> it in AUR, if it isn't part of gle package.

Sorry, it seems I wasn't clear with my explanation: gle and gle-graphics
are the same project, I was asking which was considered the upstream name.
I guess you could just merge gle with gle-graphics and be done with it.

More information about the aur-general mailing list