[aur-general] Deletion and rename requests

[Lex Black]

Am 02.07.2012 22:53, schrieb Connor Behan:
> I didn't rename these because this can only be done if a package with
> the new name has been uploaded. Maybe I will do this later but I don't
> think it's very pressing since there are still packages in [extra] that
> use a "python-" prefix when they should use "python2-". Thanks!
>
Good to know about that.


And again. I'm back with some more requests *duck*

# utube:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21994
There exists an other version 
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23584
And before I applied the changes to the PKGBuild of utube-gtk both 
PKGBuilds were the same.

# xpdf-openmotif
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39525
Newer version for the same: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51660

# wpa_supplicant-libeap:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39439
Patchfile not available. and propably duplicate of 
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39378
(PKGBuilds do more or less the same and it's noted about the duplicate 
in the comments)

# tetex:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1746
Not sure what about that. Texlive-core provides tetex. And aur-helpers 
point to the repo version.

# revhosts:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15345
Sourcelink and page dead

# transmission-gtk-ipv6:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45144
Original maintainer wanted it to be deleted

# zexy:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19274
---> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58141 The creator of this 
package wonders, if they should be merged

# xulrunner-qt:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36107
Submitter vote for deletion, because this package isn't needed anymore



Greetings