[aur-general] AUR and unsuported architectures

Connor Behan connor.behan at gmail.com
Fri Jun 1 23:21:04 EDT 2012

On 01/06/12 08:17 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> Given that this question ("is arm/ppc allowed in AUR?") has had a bit
> of mixed responses, can I expect a bit more of discussion on this, or
> should I consider the "no" final? Thanks, 

I wouldn't consider the "no" final. If you put a PKGBUILD in the AUR
that says arch=('i686', 'x86_64' 'arm' 'ppc') and someone requests that
it be deleted for that reason, I'm not going to delete it.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 554 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120601/c8e122a1/attachment.asc>

More information about the aur-general mailing list