[aur-general] wxgtk-2.9 removal?
alucryd at gmail.com
Mon Jun 25 06:32:33 EDT 2012
I'll go with the first option then^^ Thx
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Ike Devolder <ike.devolder at gmail.com>wrote:
> Op maandag 25 juni 2012 10:17:52 schreef Maxime Gauduin:
> > Hi guys,
> > It seems a wxgtk2.9 has landed in community not too long ago, making my
> > package (wxgtk-2.9 in aur,
> > obsolete. However some aur packages depend on it, is it ok to delete it,
> > should I wait until everybody has switched their dependencies to the
> > community package?
> > Thx in advance.
> > --
> > Alucryd
> > "In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished
> > eternal damnation. Amen."
> you could leave some comments for the packages depending on wxgtk-2.9 and
> state they now should depend on wxgtk2.9. give them some time (a week, two
> weeks) and then re-open this thread for deletion or wxgtk-2.9.
> you could also opt for direct removal and just leave comments to depend on
> the first is more nice :)
"In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished into
eternal damnation. Amen."
More information about the aur-general