[aur-general] Removal request: google-chrome-mini
tailinchu at gmail.com
Mon Mar 26 13:27:54 EDT 2012
my point is that if a user can edit depends=, he could also as well
edit build flags.
i dont think this is a good idea to ban users like this. someone mentioned that
creating too many similar packages will create confusion. I dont think
this applies to me.
i already renamed the package to "google-chrome-no-gconf"; this is
really clear and distinguishable
from 3 other google-chrome packages.
for people who read my last post, i just searched mplayer:
mplayer-fribidi-pulse and mplayer-fribidi. you might think "why does
these guys create new pkgbuild while mplayer in extra has all these
features?" the reason is that "he feels he needs to", and i think this
btw, there are many pkgbuild that are "out-of-date for a long time",
"does not compile", "orphaned for years", or "has dead upstream". I
think you should put effort on these packages. picking on the packages
that are similar should be the last thing to work on.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Det <nimetonmaili at gmail.com> wrote:
> Just came here to say I had a good laugh from all this.
> But the thing is that if we banned this guy all his other 12 packages would need new maintainers (they don't seem to be anything special, though. His most voted package with 17 votes (no-gconf) doesn't even require maintenance).
>  = https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=taylorchu&SeB=m
>  = https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36554
More information about the aur-general