[aur-general] Catalyst/Nvidia cleanup

Jesse Juhani Jaara jesse.jaara at gmail.com
Fri May 11 15:33:09 EDT 2012


#Please remove the following out-of-date/old versions of catalyst
#packages. None of them probably builds with the current stock kernels,
#and mostlikely need really old version of X.org

[1]catalyst-beta
[2]catalyst-ice
[3]catalyst-leaked
[4]catalyst-old
[5]catalyst-switch
[6]catalyst-tp
[7]catalyst-utils-old

---------------------------------------------------------------------

[1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31216
[2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15482
[3]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28842
[4]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25105
[5]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48208
[6]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16406
[7]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25106

=====================================================================

#The following nvdia binary blob releated packages should be removed.
#Reasons include orphan, out-of-date, old (beta/testing) versions, which
#do not work with our current kernels, X.org or need some older gcc
#release.

[10]cuda-beta
[11]cuda-sdk-beta
[12]cuda-toolkit-beta

[13]cuda-old
[14]cuda-sdk-old
[15]cuda-toolkit-old
##If needed the -old packages should be reuploaded as cuda2-X like done
##with most other applications and as with the verison 3 branch of
#cuda(cuda3-X)

[16]cuda-sdk-gcc34
#Do we really need a version for gcc34?

---------------------------------------------------------------------

[10]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48012
[11]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47707
[12]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47706

[13]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30504
[14]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30506
[15]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30505

[16]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26331

=====================================================================

[20]nvidia-96xx-fbcondecor
[21]nvidia-96xx-ice
[22]nvidia-96xx-zen
#No maintainer and depend on the old kernel26 naming scheme,
#nvidia-96xx-all can build a package for any installed kernel. Merging
#to nvidia-96xx-all, instead of removal, might be the way to go.

[23]lib32-nvidia-utils-96xx

---------------------------------------------------------------------

[20]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25475
[21]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15440
[22]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13901

[23]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32046

=====================================================================

[30]nvidia-173xx-ck
[31]nvidia-173xx-fbcondecor
[32]nvidia-173xx-ice
[33]nvidia-173xx-lqx
[34]nvidia-173xx-lts
#Merge into [35]nvidia-173xx-all, same reason as with the 96xx branch.
#nvidia-173xx-all, is out-of-date but maintained unlike the others.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

[30]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44381
[31]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31986
[32]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21059
[33]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46877
[34]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46112

[35]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32909

=====================================================================

[40]nvidia-256
[41]nvidia-ck-256
[42]nvidia-utils-256
[43]lib32-nvidia-utils-256
#If I undertood correctly from my googling, this is not an major version
#branch, which dropped support for old hw. At the moment of writing
#binary repo nvidia, has all of the same functionality + more

--------------------------------------------------------------------

[40]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42037
[41]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43968
[42]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42038
[43]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43969

=====================================================================

[50]nvidia-275xx
[51]nvidia-275xx-ck
[52]nvidia-utils-275xx
[53]lib32-nvidia-utils-275xx
[54]opencl-nvidia-275xx
#If I understood correctly my googling, this is older version of the one
#in binary repos (at the moment of writing), with the exeption of this
#being for X.org server 1.11.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

[50]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52283
[51]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55013
[52]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52285
[53]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52284
[54]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52286

=====================================================================

[60]nforce-nvsound
[61]nforce-nvsound-utils
#Some really old OSS sound driver for nForce 1/2 motherboards, support
#for them exist in kernel tree, accoeding to comments.

[62]nvidia-builder
#Out-of-date, non maintained, we can easily manage without it too. Easy
#to remake if ever needed

[63]rivatv-cvs
#Old kernel triver, last commit 4 years ago, I'd be suprised if it would
#build with modern kernel, without 5000 lines of patches ^_^

---------------------------------------------------------------------

[60]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6922
[61]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6923

[62]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31604

[63]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9500

=====================================================================

[70]nvidia-beta-zen: badly out-of-date, no maintainer
[71]nvidia-ice-beta: -||-
[72]nvidia-tp: -||-
[73]nvidia-utils-glselect: -||-
[74]nvidia-utils-ice: -||-
[75]nvidia-utils-pselec: -||-
[76]nvidia-utils-sane: -||-
[77]nvidia-vs: -||-
[78]nvidia-xen
#out-of-date, no maintainer, does not build for xen kernel, but instead
#the one which one booted in. `uname -r`

[79]nvidia-yi: badly out-of-date, no maintainer.
[80]nvidia-zen-stable

---------------------------------------------------------------------

[70]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13904
[71]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20410
[72]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14974
[73]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35814
[74]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50024
[75]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35824
[76]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29617
[77]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45327
[78]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13093
[79]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37948
[80]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30154


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20120511/ad13122c/attachment.asc>


More information about the aur-general mailing list