[aur-general] Not the way to go: teamviewer and teamviewer-stable

[Federico Cinelli]

Have you guys been in touch with him yet? I'm sure someone else will 
gladly take over the package if he's no longer interested

Federico Cinelli @ 213.985.9643
CINELLI Motorsports LLC
CINELLI Thoughts @ http://www.CINELLIthoughts.com/
Stay true.


On 05/28/2012 06:03 PM, José Valecillos wrote:
> Is stupid, he is just eagerness for take over the package. I use
> teamviewer and the current maintainer update the package very often
> (more than I'd like).
>
> 2012/5/28 Christian Stadegaart<e-mail at bewust-leven.nl>:
>> Maandag 28 Mei 2012 om 21:41 (CEST +0200) schreef Andrea Scarpino:
>>
>>
>>> On Monday 28 May 2012 20:57:58 Christian Stadegaart wrote:
>>>> In my opinion, if Hilinus isn't maintaining properly, the package should
>>>> be orphaned and then maintained by someone else, perhaps tlm. There
>>>> probably is a standard protocol for these kind of issues.
>>> Someone flagged the package as out-of-date at 13:34 GMT[1], and 20 minutes
>>> later tlm uploaded the new one.
>>> We should probably delete tlm's package[2] instead.
>>>
>>> [1] "This package has been flagged out of date. (Mon, 28 May 2012 13:34:02
>>> +0000)" https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36481
>>>
>>> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59577
>>>
>> I agree, the older package is version 7.0.9348-1, the newer one by tlm is
>> 7.0.9350-3, which is just slightly newer.
>>
>> --
>> Christian Stadegaart
>>
>
>