[aur-general] AUR and unsuported architectures

Phillip Smith lists at fukawi2.nl
Thu May 31 07:10:59 EDT 2012

On 31 May 2012 17:38, Jelle van der Waa <jelle at vdwaa.nl> wrote:
> When I first though about it, I wanted to say "why not", it doesn't hurt
> the functioning of the normal i686,x86_64 packages.

I thought the same, but after thinking more... While AUR is
"unsupported", the project/site is still an official item.

In my mind, it doesn't make sense to include unofficial platforms in
official infrastructure, supported or not.

We don't encourage documentation of other platforms in our wiki (do we?)

More information about the aur-general mailing list