[aur-general] AUR and unsuported architectures

[Phillip Smith]

On 31 May 2012 17:38, Jelle van der Waa <jelle at vdwaa.nl> wrote:
> When I first though about it, I wanted to say "why not", it doesn't hurt
> the functioning of the normal i686,x86_64 packages.

I thought the same, but after thinking more... While AUR is
"unsupported", the project/site is still an official item.

In my mind, it doesn't make sense to include unofficial platforms in
official infrastructure, supported or not.

We don't encourage documentation of other platforms in our wiki (do we?)