[aur-general] Naming convention for Python 2 and 3 apps
cyberdupo56 at gmail.com
Wed Nov 28 21:36:26 EST 2012
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 07:07:27AM -0500, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote:
> If it is an application and does not provide a module that could be
> included in another application, then I suggest to depend on python3
> only and keep the name "flake8".
That sounds reasonable enough, but I think we'll still need separate
versions here. flake8 is a code checker, and it seems to run into
trouble between Python 2 and 3 code since it runs the code when checking
it. Backward incompatibility is troublesome.
*-python is no good since it looks like it's used for Python APIs and
More information about the aur-general