[aur-general] nvidia-ice needs to be updated
Cian Mc Govern
cian at cianmcgovern.com
Thu Oct 25 09:24:40 EDT 2012
Didn't know it existed :) I've adapted the nvidia-all package:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32908 and updated it for
304.60. I used your PKGBUILD from the nvidia-beta-all package but
changed it slightly so that it doesn't build the module for the
linux-mainline kernel. I'm currently maintaining the nvidia-mainline
package and I think it's better to keep them seperate as the
nvidia-mainline package regularly needs patching to compile against
the mainline kernel.
On 25 October 2012 01:38, Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk at gmail.com> wrote:
> Shameless plug - why not just use nvidia-all (or nvidia-beta-all if
> that floats your boat). nvidea-X packages, where X is some custom
> kernel, tend to have very low usage since usage of X kernel to begin
> with is pretty low, and nvidia-X usage must be a subset of that.
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Cian Mc Govern <cian at cianmcgovern.com> wrote:
>> No, I'll send the maintainer an email now. I didn't think there would
>> be any need seeing as it hasn't been updated in over a year.
>> On 24 October 2012 22:00, Alexandre Ferrando <alferpal at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 24 October 2012 22:47, Cian Mc Govern <cian at cianmcgovern.com> wrote:
>>>> The nvidia-ice package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15441 hasn't
>>>> been updated in over a year. Can the powers at be transfer the maintenance
>>>> of the package over to me? My username is cian1500ww.
>>> Have you contacted the maintainer over e-mail and waited two weeks for
>>> response? If yes, ask for orphaning the package. If not, contact him.
>>> Trusted Users can't just transfer maintenance of one package from one
>>> person to another.
Cian Mc Govern
My GPG Public Key: http://www.cianmcgovern.com/gpg-public-key/
More information about the aur-general