[aur-general] Merge request: imagej
paolo.herms at lri.fr
Wed Sep 5 03:50:40 EDT 2012
as I already explained to Michael Schubert, ImageJ plugins must be installed
into some specified plugin directory to be found.
In order to allow users manually installing plugins locally, the original
package creates a plugin directory structure in the $HOME.
The rational of making imagej-shared was to have a clean package without an
error prone launch script but forcing plugins to be installed into
/usr/share/... preferably by making a archlinux package for each plugin.
But there are really many plugins, so this method has its inconvenients as
well, so it doesn't seem easy to decide which one is better.
Before just "merging" the two packages - you actually just deleted mine - did
you make sure the imagej-plugin-* packages continue working?
On Tuesday 04 September 2012 22:27:44 Michael Schubert wrote:
> Dear TUs,
> Please merge imagej-shared  into imagej . Both use the
> non-java-bundled version of the software as they should.
> Maintainer of  in CC.
>  https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40634
>  https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26559
More information about the aur-general