[aur-general] TU Application - Jonathan Steel
xyne at archlinux.ca
Wed Sep 5 06:10:35 EDT 2012
Dave Reisner wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 07:58:01PM +0200, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
>> On 01.09.2012 01:40, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
>> >Ok chaps, time's up. Let's vote:
>> The vote is still going but we could effectively stop it right there
>> because it's impossible to change the decision at this point even if
>> every remaining TU voted "no". Can we stop it at this point?
>By act of Pinkie, I declare this candidate to be rejected.
>No seriously, I think we have a clause that allows this to end early.
>Consults the book of arma^W^W^Wbylaws.
I only skimmed through them  but I didn't find any clause permitting
acceptance of the vote before the voting period is over. I remember that we
discussed this here before and I think we came to the conclusion that even if
the result is fixed, we would still wait for everyone to cast their vote, out
of respect. Voting is also used as a measurement of activity so closing the
vote early may interfere with that, even if voting is rarely consider on its
A week is not a long time to wait and it gives everyone the chance to express
their opinion about the candidate, even if the outcome is unchanged.
More information about the aur-general