[aur-general] Aur package removal

Alex Belanger i.caught.air at gmail.com
Fri Sep 14 01:43:03 EDT 2012


I think they do it because otherwise some users would remove their packages
thinking nobody uses them while it might not be the case. People doesn't
seem to understand a PKGBUILD, even if orphaned, does no harm and might
even help some - as long as the name isn't conflicting with anything of
course.

Maybe a TU could explain it better the I.

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
<artafinde at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Andrzej Giniewicz <gginiu at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On 13.09.2012 21:59, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I uploaded a new renamed version of one of the packages I maintain.
> >> Can someone please remove the old package from the repository?
> >
> > Done, thanks.
> >
> > Andrzej.
>
> Thanks for that, is it possible for users like me to have access to
> manage their own packages? Surely not others packages but the ones
> they maintain seems logical.
>
> --
> Caution: breathing may be hazardous to your health.
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> int main(){printf("%s","\x4c\x65\x6f\x6e\x69\x64\x61\x73");}
>


More information about the aur-general mailing list