[aur-general] discussion about activity

[Lukas Fleischer]

On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 02:10:45PM +0000, Xyne wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I want to discuss our notions of "activity". According to the current bylaws,
> [...]

This discussion starts to get messy. Now there are three different
threads discussing the same thing, basically. Could we please
concentrate on the current proposal and the related discussion before
initiating a new one?

Also, you still didn't comment on the suggestion to remove the activity
part from the quorum computation altogether. Please read Sébastien's
reply (and follow-ups) to my proposal. The quorum is meant to ensure
that a result is representative. If 60% of all TUs are inactive, we can
currently establish a quorum of 100%. This does not seem right to me.
Also, dropping the activity restriction makes things a lot easier, so
this gets a +2 from me...