[aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Honor TUs who become active/inactive during votes

Xyne xyne at archlinux.ca
Thu Aug 8 10:26:53 EDT 2013

Xyne wrote:

>Lukas Fleischer wrote:
>>> The clause should probably also specify that removal votes take precedence over
>>> any other pending votes except removal votes.
>>What does this mean in practice? :)
>Let's say that the discussion period for a TU application begins and the vote
>is scheduled to start on Monday. A motion is made for the removal of a TU
>during this period and the vote should normally start on Tuesday. I think the
>application vote should be suspended until the removal vote is finished. It
>affects quorum and the outcome of the vote.
>If two removal votes are scheduled then they occur in the usual order.

>I think that's it. I have attached up updated version of my previous
>submission. Take a look and let me know what you think.

That version does not include any mention of removal votes preceding other votes.

More information about the aur-general mailing list