[aur-general] Merge/Remove Request : libkqueue

[Maxime GAUDUIN]

On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 8:22 PM, SJ_UnderWater <webmaster0007 at rcn.com> wrote:

> > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia <
> palopezv at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2013/7/3 Xorg <xorgbreaker at gmail.com>
> > >
> > > Hi everybody.
> > >
> > >
> > > Developers don't use svn today (I have downloaded source from svn, we
> can see 2010-09-18  v1.0  r344 the latest date in ChangeLog).
> > >
> > > So, only libkqueue0 appears to be good.
> > > I suggest to merge libkqueue and libkqueue-svn into libkqueue0, and
> then rename libkqueue0 into libkqueue, for example.
> > >
> >
> > libkqueue is alive and well at http://sourceforge.net/p/libkqueue/ and
> > the SVN repository is at http://sourceforge.net/p/libkqueue/code/ The
> > latest checkin (r652) was on June 11 this year. You may want to
> > contact the maintainer and see if he/she wants to orphan the packages
> > for you to update, instead.
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://about.me/palopezv
> >
> > I see libkqueue-svn has been orphaned, you can adopt and update. About
> libkqueue{,0}, did you try contacting the maintainers? It would be better
> to have maintainer of libkqueue0 adopt libkqueue and then merge libkqueue0
> into it. I'm CCing both of them.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > --
> > Maxime
> I once tried to contact niQo about these Apple-sourced packages, but
> created my -0 variants to better conform to the standards so they could at
> least see what I was talking about; I also respond to flags pretty quickly.
> I notice now that stativ has summarily deleted libpthread_workqueue0 for
> which I don't have a backup, is this normal? I would have appreciated some
> notice. If niQo decides to orphan them, I will accept.
>
> SJ


I will disown libkqueue in 2 weeks time provided there is no answer from
niQo, then you can adopt it and we will proceed with the merge.

Cheers,

-- 
Maxime