[aur-general] Massive orphan request II
b at bpiotrowski.pl
Tue Jul 9 02:06:51 EDT 2013
On 2013-07-08 22:43, Frank Vanderham wrote:
>>> That list is huge. I can certainly pick up a couple, but some of them
>>> horribly outdated; is it an option to delete the ones that haven't been
>>> updated in - say - 12 months just to bring it down to a manageable
>>> It would be a waste of resources to spend time on a package that nobody
>>> using anymore.
>> I'm afraid it's not possible to remove old and unmaintained packages,
>> unless e.g. the upstream is dead i.e. the source is missing:
> [sorry, accidentally hit Send too soon]
> Can we create a "zombie / placeholder" status for those packages that need
> to be kept as Xyne mentions: " Even if the PKGBUILD is an ancient relic
> from the age of Judd in need of a complete rewrite, we tend to leave them
> as placeholders." I just don't think it's feasible to maintain all packages
> that were created once upon a time, since *anyone* can create a package on
There is something wrong with mine or your mail client – every time you
send a message, you create new thread.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the aur-general