[aur-general] About orphaning all packages of inactive users

Anatol Pomozov anatol.pomozov at gmail.com
Fri Jul 19 00:16:50 EDT 2013


On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Agustin Ferrario
<agustin.ferrario at hotmail.com.ar> wrote:
> On 07/18/2013 11:39 PM, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
>> Hi
>> Is there any style checker tool for PKGBUILD files? Something similar
>> to lint? If yes then it worth checking for style violations as well,
>> e.g. "PKGBUILD does not have package()" function. So bot can send a
>> note to owner and mark the package somehow e.g. "Needs improvements"
>> If no improvement has been done during some period then the package is
>> disowned.
> Namcap...

Yeah, namcap looks like what I kept in mind. I think there should be a
bot that nags about style violation + disowning if no improvements
were made during long period of time (e.g. 1 year). This should
improve AUR packages quality.

More information about the aur-general mailing list