[aur-general] TU application
public at dicebot.lv
Mon Jul 22 09:03:01 EDT 2013
On 07/22/2013 01:56 PM, Martti Kühne wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Dicebot <public at dicebot.lv> wrote:
>> It is nothing of real importance but question is, what harm does
>> explicit versioning do?
> Correct me if I overlooked it, but from what I have read here, but I
> have yet to see an argument that applies to the specific case here.
> AUR users are factually more vulnerable to missing versions on
> dependencies (for an added upstream feature) than repository packages,
> because enforcement of AUR client state is up to the sysadmin/aur
> helper. This might not apply to the community repository, I just got
> the feeling things won't be eaten as hot as they were cooked here.
I have similar impression so far but I just silently following the
discussion and waiting until some consensus is reached ;)
More information about the aur-general