[aur-general] Multiple requests
karol.blazewicz at gmail.com
Wed Jun 19 19:56:46 EDT 2013
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bacula/ is basically the same as
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bacula-mysql/ . They both are
orphans, but the latter is more up to date. Is it OK to merge bacula
with bacula-mysql or let them both be?
According to the comment, the package is obsolete. The source is gone too.
According to the comment, the package is obsolete.
According to the comment, it's OK to remove it.
The source is gone.
3. Songbird stuff: http://blog.songbirdnest.com/
The last package has a comment that says the Nightingale project
maintains a mirror for songbird:
Is it OK to remove songbird packages?
bukkit's description says "You are probably looking for the
'craftbukkit' package." The PKGBUILD doesn't list a proper source ...
Same maintainer, see comment for claws-mail-extra-plugins-cvs:
"Claws-mail moved to git, so please do not use this package but
Have a look at the comment on cockatrice about C&D from Hasbro
http://code.google.com/p/compcache/: "compcache-0.6.2 is marked
deprecated (so nothing available for download now). Please use the
version available in the mainline (drivers/staging/zram)."
(No idea if it makes sense, see comments)
See drcouzelis' comment on curator.
Hey, TUs, do you prefer shorter, bite-sized mails or longer ones?
Separate mails for merging, deleting and other stuff?
If a package has e.g. one vote and no important comments, do I still
have to suggest merging with a suitable package or is it OK to just
delete it? I have no idea which is faster and which is the proper way.
More information about the aur-general