[aur-general] packages without category

Diego Principe cdprincipe at gmail.com
Wed Jun 26 13:43:48 EDT 2013


Ok, I'll fix my packages.
I'm "Diego" on AUR
*Diego*


2013/6/26 Rob Til Freedmen <rob.til.freedman at gmail.com>

> There are 828 packages from 299 maintainers where category is set to 'none'
> - another 209 packages are orphaned.
>
> orphan - Buce
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=0
>
> buhman - gtmanfred
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=250
>
> gtmanfred - Perberos
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=500
>
> Perberos - yhager
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=750
>
> yhager - zosodk69
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=1000
>
> full csv list of packages with category=none (no orphaned listed)
> http://sprunge.us/Necd
>
> This top-20 list counting for nearly 50% of the packages
>       8 masterkorp
>       9 Huulivoide
>       9 zootboy
>      10 spider-mario
>      11 buhman
>      11 kevku
>      11 nbryskin
>      12 eworm
>      13 demonicmaniac
>      15 crocowhile
>      16 Mizuchi
>      16 t-8ch
>      18 taylorchu
>      21 chenxiaolong
>      27 Diego
>      32 gtmanfred
>      33 yhager
>      34 StefanHusmann
>      35 Perberos
>      43 Morfeo
>
> full csv list maintainers with a count of packages with category=none
> http://sprunge.us/BDFD
>
> I think this has no priority but should be fixed nevertheless.
>


More information about the aur-general mailing list