[aur-general] packages without category
Diego Principe
cdprincipe at gmail.com
Wed Jun 26 13:43:48 EDT 2013
Ok, I'll fix my packages.
I'm "Diego" on AUR
*Diego*
2013/6/26 Rob Til Freedmen <rob.til.freedman at gmail.com>
> There are 828 packages from 299 maintainers where category is set to 'none'
> - another 209 packages are orphaned.
>
> orphan - Buce
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=0
>
> buhman - gtmanfred
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=250
>
> gtmanfred - Perberos
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=500
>
> Perberos - yhager
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=750
>
> yhager - zosodk69
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=1000
>
> full csv list of packages with category=none (no orphaned listed)
> http://sprunge.us/Necd
>
> This top-20 list counting for nearly 50% of the packages
> 8 masterkorp
> 9 Huulivoide
> 9 zootboy
> 10 spider-mario
> 11 buhman
> 11 kevku
> 11 nbryskin
> 12 eworm
> 13 demonicmaniac
> 15 crocowhile
> 16 Mizuchi
> 16 t-8ch
> 18 taylorchu
> 21 chenxiaolong
> 27 Diego
> 32 gtmanfred
> 33 yhager
> 34 StefanHusmann
> 35 Perberos
> 43 Morfeo
>
> full csv list maintainers with a count of packages with category=none
> http://sprunge.us/BDFD
>
> I think this has no priority but should be fixed nevertheless.
>
More information about the aur-general
mailing list