[aur-general] packages without category

Diego Principe cdprincipe at gmail.com
Wed Jun 26 13:53:30 EDT 2013


All fixed

*Diego*


2013/6/26 chillermillerlong <chillermillerlong at hotmail.com>

> I guess this is caused by uploading new packages using the burp tool.
>  I'll fix my packages in a little bit. I'm chenxiaolong on the AUR.
>
>
> Sent from my T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S4
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Diego Principe <cdprincipe at gmail.com>
> Date: 06/26/2013  13:44  (GMT-05:00)
> To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" <
> aur-general at archlinux.org>
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] packages without category
>
> Ok, I'll fix my packages.
> I'm "Diego" on AUR
> *Diego*
>
>
> 2013/6/26 Rob Til Freedmen <rob.til.freedman at gmail.com>
>
> > There are 828 packages from 299 maintainers where category is set to
> 'none'
> > - another 209 packages are orphaned.
> >
> > orphan - Buce
> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=0
> >
> > buhman - gtmanfred
> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=250
> >
> > gtmanfred - Perberos
> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=500
> >
> > Perberos - yhager
> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=750
> >
> > yhager - zosodk69
> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=1000
> >
> > full csv list of packages with category=none (no orphaned listed)
> > http://sprunge.us/Necd
> >
> > This top-20 list counting for nearly 50% of the packages
> >       8 masterkorp
> >       9 Huulivoide
> >       9 zootboy
> >      10 spider-mario
> >      11 buhman
> >      11 kevku
> >      11 nbryskin
> >      12 eworm
> >      13 demonicmaniac
> >      15 crocowhile
> >      16 Mizuchi
> >      16 t-8ch
> >      18 taylorchu
> >      21 chenxiaolong
> >      27 Diego
> >      32 gtmanfred
> >      33 yhager
> >      34 StefanHusmann
> >      35 Perberos
> >      43 Morfeo
> >
> > full csv list maintainers with a count of packages with category=none
> > http://sprunge.us/BDFD
> >
> > I think this has no priority but should be fixed nevertheless.
> >
>


More information about the aur-general mailing list