[aur-general] packages without category

[John D Jones III]

On 06/26/2013 10:46 AM, Rob Til Freedmen wrote:
> There are 828 packages from 299 maintainers where category is set to 'none'
> - another 209 packages are orphaned.
>
> orphan - Buce
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=0
>
> buhman - gtmanfred
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=250
>
> gtmanfred - Perberos
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=500
>
> Perberos - yhager
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=750
>
> yhager - zosodk69
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=1000
>
> full csv list of packages with category=none (no orphaned listed)
> http://sprunge.us/Necd
>
> This top-20 list counting for nearly 50% of the packages
>        8 masterkorp
>        9 Huulivoide
>        9 zootboy
>       10 spider-mario
>       11 buhman
>       11 kevku
>       11 nbryskin
>       12 eworm
>       13 demonicmaniac
>       15 crocowhile
>       16 Mizuchi
>       16 t-8ch
>       18 taylorchu
>       21 chenxiaolong
>       27 Diego
>       32 gtmanfred
>       33 yhager
>       34 StefanHusmann
>       35 Perberos
>       43 Morfeo
>
> full csv list maintainers with a count of packages with category=none
> http://sprunge.us/BDFD
>
> I think this has no priority but should be fixed nevertheless.
>

Holy crap, I am actually shocked that jnbek doesn't appear on that 
sprunge at least once... out of almost 800 pkgs, I fig'd there would be 
at least 1 without a category, I know there were like 3 that didn't have 
a description and I think I got those fixed... but all mine with 
categories, that blows my mind, lol...
-- 
John D Jones III
Perl/Javascript/Systemd Zealot
unixgeek1972 at gmail.com
http://www.zoelife4u.org/