[aur-general] Fighting spam on the AUR

Dave Reisner d at falconindy.com
Fri Mar 15 07:25:21 EDT 2013


On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:04:38AM +0100, Timothy Redaelli wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 11:33:18 AM Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> > Status quo:
> > 
> >     06:54 < gtmanfred> ok, it really is time for something else
> >     06:54 < gtmanfred> the spammer is now creating a new account for
> >     every comment and flag out of date
> > 
> > The account suspension feature does not help here.
> > 
> > Options:
> > 
> > * Allow package maintainers to block the "Flag package out-of-date"
> >   feature for a certain amount of time. Note that this might eventually
> >   cripple the "out-of-date" function. Also, this does not work for
> >   comments.
> > 
> > * Use CAPTCHAs during account registration. We could either use MAPTCHAs
> >   ("What is 1 + 1?") or something like reCAPTCHA [1].
> > 
> > * Moderate new accounts. Might be a lot of work. We need some TUs that
> >   review and unlock accounts. Also, it might be hard to distinguish a
> >   spam bot from a regular user. If we require a short application text,
> >   this might result in less users joining the AUR.
> > 
> > * Block IP addresses. Bye-bye, Tor users!
> > 
> > Comments and suggestions welcome! We need to find a proper solution as
> > soon as possible!
> > 
> > [1] http://www.google.com/recaptcha
> 
> Hi,
> I suggest to use http://www.flameeyes.eu/projects/modsec instead (and in wiki 
> too, so we can remove the horrible captcha).
> It's an Apache mod_security backlist that reduce the spam (using DNSBL and 
> User-Agent validation).

$ curl -I https://aur.archlinux.org |& grep Server
Server: nginx/1.2.6


More information about the aur-general mailing list