[aur-general] TU application from graysky - voting period
seblu at seblu.net
Sun Mar 24 00:59:33 EDT 2013
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Xyne <xyne at archlinux.ca> wrote:
> Xyne wrote:
> The discussion period for this application was relatively short with very few
> participating TUs. The only real objections were raised by Dave (who even
> admitted that he may be "old and grumpy") and they were addressed without any
> further replies from Dave or anyone else. I simply do not understand how so
> many of you could vote no without raising issues during the discussion. Looking
> back through previous votes there is no other vote with this level of
> participation that has been split this close down the middle.
I was denied the first time I applied. I never heard strong arguments
about why from any TU.
The reason I found, is like here, an active TU express a tough opinion
(from a misunderstanding on awesome in my case).
I guess the team wants to be united and will not elect someone which
was strongly denied by one of us.
Now I see this as positive and only require to be solved before next
> There is no point in raising your objections now but I hope that you do so next
There were objections! You consider them not sufficient to leads to this result.
Everything that needed to be said has been said. After the voters have
made up their minds.
@graysky: Please keep going and convince every TU that you have to be
aboard and reapply.
Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer
More information about the aur-general