[aur-general] TU application from graysky - voting period
l.jirkovsky at gmail.com
Sun Mar 24 08:10:57 EDT 2013
On 24 March 2013 04:42, Xyne <xyne at archlinux.ca> wrote:
> If a TU has an objection that he cannot support publicly then something is very
> wrong. The application process should not be some mysterious black box of
> negative, baseless opinions. If a TU would rather keep an objection to himself
> than risk offending the candidate by expressing it then either the objection
> itself is without merit or the TU is more concerned about his own popularity
> than the quality of the distribution.
I completely agree with you. But as we have just seen, it doesn't
always work like that. In such case, a black box which can tell you
some of the reasons why people voted "No" is an improvement over
knowing absolutely nothing.
More information about the aur-general