[aur-general] TU application from graysky - voting period
xyne at archlinux.ca
Sun Mar 24 15:30:38 EDT 2013
Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
>> Objections were raised and then countered with arguments. If anyone felt that
>> the objections were still valid after that then they should have replied with
>> their reasons. That is the point of the discussion period: to discuss the
>> issues and reconsider them in the light of the evolving conversation. It gives
>> the candidate the chance to respond and adapt as well. If anyone felt that my
>> reply to Dave failed to address the issues then they should have stated why. No
>> one did.
>You explain again your former opinion.
>It's not because you are the last one to answer that you convince everyone.
>It's not because I will not give arguments to refute what you say that
>you convince me or others readers.
I think we have different definitions of "discussion".
I would also say that if you have no arguments to support an opinion then it is
baseless and should be re-examined.
More information about the aur-general