[aur-general] TU application from graysky - voting period
danielmicay at gmail.com
Sun Mar 24 16:53:08 EDT 2013
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman <schiv at archlinux.org> wrote:
> The current (majority) voting system is fine -- making decisions based
> on consensus agreement is not a suitable method for the TU selection
> process (it would needlessly raise the bar for something that is not a
> matter of public safety).
Trusting someone with the ability to push binary packages out to every
Arch user seems like something that should have a pretty high bar.
It's not just trust that they won't do anything malicious, it's trust
that they'll look after their key and won't allow a situation where
someone else would have access. They need to be able to work with the
rest of the team and take responsibility for any mistakes they make.
More information about the aur-general