[aur-general] Custom licence directory ?

[Nowaker]

> the same is done for a lot of lib32-packages in multilib.
> even if you still get a warning from namcap, this looks like a nice,
> clean and commonly accepted solution to me.

Both solutions look nice, clean and are commonly accepted. The important 
question is what the purpose behind /usr/share/licenses/$pkgname was. If 
the purpose was to know the license of a specific package, then it just 
wins.

-- 
Kind regards,
Damian Nowak
StratusHost
www.AtlasHost.eu