[aur-general] Custom licence directory ?
enwukaer at gmail.com
Mon Nov 18 11:02:24 EST 2013
> the same is done for a lot of lib32-packages in multilib.
> even if you still get a warning from namcap, this looks like a nice,
> clean and commonly accepted solution to me.
Both solutions look nice, clean and are commonly accepted. The important
question is what the purpose behind /usr/share/licenses/$pkgname was. If
the purpose was to know the license of a specific package, then it just
More information about the aur-general