[aur-general] docker v. docker
ike.devolder at gmail.com
Wed Nov 27 06:02:59 EST 2013
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:56:44AM +0100, Ike Devolder wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 03:24:37AM +0100, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> > On 26/11/2013 16:00, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> > > extra/docker is currently a very old system tray app for openbox2,
> > > kde3 and gnome2. It hasn't been updated in a very, very long time.
> > >
> > > docker (https://www.docker.io/) on the other hand, is a widely used
> > > and current container solution. As of 0.7, it's now available on all
> > > distributions (previously was only available on ubuntu).
> > >
> > > There will be a naming conflict between the two very soon. I would be
> > > in favour of renaming extra/docker preemptively since it hasn't been
> > > updated in a decade.
> > I ping'ed Daniel about his feeling on this. He's the maintainer. I'm
> > currently looking to docker for addition to community. Probably
> > docker-io, to stay in touch with fedora.
> > Cheers,
> > --
> > Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer
> > https://www.seblu.net
> > GPG: 0x2072D77A
> We should go for 'docker' or 'lxc-docker', 'docker-io' seems a bad
> choice to me, and we don't have to be on par with fedora in any way.
> originally the docker people chose to use lxc-docker for their ubuntu
> ppa, since this name is chosen by the docker people it looks like a good
we dont need this discussion it seems, it is already added as lxc-docker
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the aur-general