[aur-general] [rmlint] Package merge

[Doug Newgard]

----------------------------------------
> From: florian at floriandejonckheere.be
> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:12:36 +0200
> To: aur-general at archlinux.org
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] [rmlint] Package merge
>
> ----------------------------------------
>
>>> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 17:58:25 +0200
>>> From: florian at floriandejonckheere.be
>>> To: aur-general at archlinux.org
>>> Subject: Re: [aur-general] [rmlint] Package merge
>>>
>>> On Oct 16, 2013 5:44 PM, "Doug Newgard" <scimmia22 at outlook.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>>> From: florian at floriandejonckheere.be
>>>>> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:12:42 +0200
>>>>> To: aur-general at archlinux.org
>>>>> Subject: [aur-general] [rmlint] Package merge
>>>>>
>>>>> Please merge rmlint [1] into rmlint-git [2]. GitHub dropped named
>>> downloads
>>>>> a while ago, and thus the package is outdated.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rmlint/
>>>>> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rmlint-git/
>>>>
>>>> It's out of date, but I don't know about outdated. You can still get
>>> release tarballs from Github.
>>>
>>> But the release tarballs reflect the current state of master, if I'm not
>>> mistaken.
>>
>> Nope, they reflect tags. You can get a tarball of master as well, but
>> that's not what I'm talking about.
>
>
> As far as I can tell from the repo, the only existing tag is '1.0.6b',
> which makes the AUR package more recent. Am I missing something?

Just that the author is really bad at versioning. 1.0.8 in the AUR is from Apr 2011, the 1.0.6b tag is from Nov 2012, and 1.0.0 in the debian dir is from Mar 2013.