[aur-general] Re-iterating the problem of AUR xorriso and Archlinux libisoburn

Thomas Schmitt scdbackup at gmx.net
Mon Oct 21 05:03:05 EDT 2013


The proposal to augment package "libisoburn" is in the
bug tracker since a month.
(See https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/36931 )
I am thankful towards the package maintainer of "libisoburn"
for keeping it up to date. So i refrain from bothering him

Now what to do about the two outdated and misleading AUR
packages "xorriso" and "xorriso-tcltk" ?

Throw them out without substitution ?

Remove their "Sources" and rather make them depend on
"libisoburn" instead ?

Have a nice day :)


More information about the aur-general mailing list