[aur-general] Package merge request: vim-solarized-git and vim-colors-solarized-git

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jason St. John <jstjohn at purdue.edu> 
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Felix Yan <felixonmars at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>>  On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 20:28:36 Jason St. John wrote:
>>>  On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Jason St. John 
>>> <jstjohn at purdue.edu> wrote:
>>>  > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Jason St. John 
>>> <jstjohn at purdue.edu> wrote:
>>>  >> Hello,
>>>  >>
>>>  >> I'm not sure which is a better package name as there seems to 
>>> be no
>>>  >> dominating convention in the AUR, so I will leave that decision 
>>> up to
>>>  >> the TUs.
>>>  >>
>>>  >> Please do one of the following:
>>>  >> --- merge vim-solarized-git into vim-colors-solarized-git
>>>  >> --- have the package maintainer update vim-solarized-git and 
>>> delete
>>>  >> vim-colors-solarized-git
>>>  >>
>>>  >>
>>>  >> I've CC'd the maintainer of both packages.
>>>  >>
>>>  >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-solarized-git/
>>>  >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-colors-solarized-git/
>>>  >>
>>>  >> Thanks
>>>  >
>>>  > This still needs to be acted upon.
>>> 
>>>  Can a TU delete vim-solarized-git please?
>>> 
>>>  Jason
>>> 
>>  We still need to wait for xales's response, as this is his package 
>> and will still be maintained by him even after the merge.
>> 
>>  Regards,
>>  Felix Yan
>> 
> xales is the new maintainer of both packages, and instead of updating
> vim-solarized-git, he created a new package
> (vim-colors-solarized-git). I think it's pretty clear which package
> xales prefers.
> 
> Jason
> 

Merged, thx.
--
Maxime