[aur-general] AUR GIT and Bug Tracker

mrlemux at gmail.com mrlemux at gmail.com
Tue Aug 19 07:06:08 EDT 2014


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 08/19/2014 11:18 AM, carstene1ns wrote:
> Am 18.08.2014 um 10:01 schrieb mrlemux at gmail.com:
>> the problem is that most issue tracking systems are too heavy for
>> our uses(correct me if i'm wrong), and if we want it really KISS
>> we have to implent an issue tracking system ourselves (with a
>> feature base like github's one). i think it could replace the
>> current comment section as it is mostly used for reporting Bugs
>> already
> 
> I also like this idea. Over the years the package pages have been 
> cluttered with comments that are not applicable today anymore. Who
> cares today, if a version from 2007 did not compile correctly? Also
> users tend to write a small comment "version x.y is out" when 
> flagging a package out of date and leave it there after the package
> has been updated. It would be nice to have a lightweight tracker,
> that allows the user to choose between at least 3 types of ticket:
> bug, comment, out-of-date. The maintainer can then close an
> out-of-date ticket with a git push or respond to a bug report.
> Comments that are not not relevant anymore can also be closed after
> a time. If we think this a bit further, also the request system can
> be integrated as tickets that can be only closed by a TU. This
> would also avoid the cluttering we have today with the additional
> mailing list, as closed tickets can be shown when needed later.
I think everything should be a "bug",and TU's and maintainers should
both have the same rights(the right to merge commits(But there are
rules they have to follow)), users could associate commits  by
commiting there files with a special tag that referes to that
"bug"(something like {fix:#<issue_number>})
these would then also appear in the current "thread"

The bug could then, be either closed by merging the commit with the
assoxiated  {fix:#} (Users have 5 Days time to reopen the bug if it
just fixes half of it or something like that) or have a specialcommit
which refers to the bug in the commit message(something like
{close:#<issue_number>}, or a designated close button

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT8y+gAAoJEBWTDgtqAPQNwakIAL1LqjjG9olQTIxYenygbqlL
x8Ww2nHxz4dnYo3eE5QAJDwSqJ96fUJHltqZ+OLZ6tjM2KPsqGJ0bw7Fla9n5Dgo
9hdgg6YDIZAQJ8IesDRCiE6HQBf2plJ7BMqqA8pJCRYW7KGYc22JTkMs6kQryuWG
95HreC1keixXMbew4Udb3ECDquCUsCKEzw5Q6dHlgQPVlVRMZ4XqrJ92n3eOlII+
EBlriPSAWtYgAyb9R6MrLycsuLOT0A+gOE5CaU5UbVaDPiVL2ev9qsKARJ1uypTA
iT2lQNZkRSrQ8C63VRx+8lN4zUI7SFZfOktoawh2sE2F6wkzgdCt5JeLJs+WruA=
=1geE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the aur-general mailing list