[aur-general] Should we recommend removing comments from the AUR?

[Hugo Osvaldo Barrera]

On 2014-12-02 13:40, Martti Kühne wrote:
> Comments have a timestamp. You can, after all, just compare the
> comment date with the package's upload date.
> And then again. We could actually have comments more recent than the
> last source package upload have a wee bit stronger contrast and maybe
> *bold* font.
> 
> cheers!
> mar77i

I'd love to see markdown support on the AUR. It's simple enough, but makes a
huge difference. Especially when you bundle plenty of links, lists, etc.

Also, since markdown is so simple, it can be emailed as-is in plain text.

-- 
Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: Why should I start my reply below the quoted text?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20141206/eb9d1287/attachment.bin>