[aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

[Sam Stuewe]

On 2014-02-03 16:11, Nowaker wrote:
> Yeah, but Arch Linux TUs seem to prefer "project name" than "package
> name proposed by the upstream". I have recently reported an issue
> stating that it's not possible to find PowerDNS with pacman -Ss
> powerdns. xyproto changed the package name from pdns (that's how the
> tarball is named upstream) to powerdns.
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/38231
That's valid. I don't honestly mind. Though the lwks package in the ALUR 
really needs to be updated to fetch the source from upstream (which it 
currently doesn't do).

-- 
All the best,
Sam Stuewe (HalosGhost)