[aur-general] Deletion/Rename request: pebble-sdk{-beta}

Daniel Landau daniel.landau at iki.fi
Thu Feb 13 14:58:31 EST 2014

On 2014-02-13 10:18, Florian Bruhin wrote:
> * Daniel Landau <daniel.landau at iki.fi> [2014-02-13 10:00:52 -0600]:
>> On 2014-02-13 04:27, Florian Bruhin wrote:
>> >I'm the current maintainer of the pebble-sdk-beta[1] package.
>> I don't have comments on your actual questions but I do have one of my 
>> own:
>> [2] claims a license of GPLv3 and [1] claims MIT. I can't find license
>> information in the SDK tar balls but I do find binaries without
>> corresponding sources. What's the deal here?
>> >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pebble-sdk-beta/
>> >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pebble-sdk/
> * Taylor Lookabaugh <jesus.christ.i.love at gmail.com> [2014-02-13 
> 08:10:02 -0800]:
>> I went as far as looking in the github repository and I'm guessing the
>> sdk-beta assumed MIT based on this[1] where it says all examples are
>> released under MIT License.
>> [1]https://github.com/pebble/pebble-sdk-examples
> Yeah, this is just a best guess based on the examples license, and
> tools/LICENSE which also says MIT.

As far as I can tell, e.g., the PebbleKit-Android directory has source 
code but no license and the Pebble directory (for developing watch 
faces?) contains a compiled libpebble.a archive with no source code and 
no license.


More information about the aur-general mailing list