[aur-general] Remove a few packages

[Anatol Pomozov]

Hi

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Maxime Gauduin <alucryd at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Anatol Pomozov
> <anatol.pomozov at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please remove a number of unused versioned packages:
>>
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-fog-1.15/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-celluloid-0.14.1/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-celluloid-io-0.14.1/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-coderay-1.0.5/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-equalizer-0.0.7/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-excon-0.25.0/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-github_api-0.10.1/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-gssapi-1.0.0/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-httpi-0.9.0/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-mime-types-1.16/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-minitar-0.5.4/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-mixlib-config-1.1.2/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-moneta-0.6.0/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-multipart-post-1.2.0/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-net-ssh-multi-1.1.2/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-nori-1.0.0/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-puma-1.6.3/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-ridley-1.5.3/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-rubyntlm-0.1.1/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-wasabi-1.0.0/
>>
>> Incorrectly named packages that should be removed as well:
>>
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-digital-ocean/
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-exception-notification/
>>
>> All nuked.

Thanks. A few more that I missed

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-excon-0.25/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-fog-1.15.0/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-memoizable-0.2/

>> please merge
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-sdl/
>> into
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-rubysdl/
>>
>
> What's the rationale behind this change? ruby-sdl is perfectly fine,
> ruby-rubysdl is just silly imho.

The gemname is 'rubysdl' http://rubygems.org/gems/rubysdl, the package
name should be 'ruby-$gemname'. The question should go to upstream
developers - why do they use "ruby" prefix in their gem names if the
gems are for ruby only anyway.