[aur-general] AUR 3.3.0 released
evorster at gmail.com
Wed Jul 9 08:59:00 EDT 2014
> I don't see the relevance to the point this seemed to be a response to.
> That package may be hard/impossible to maintain, true - but separate
> flags for 'out of date', 'broken', 'wont compile' wouldn't aid that
> situation any. In fact they might make it worse.
> If one flag just signifies that something is wrong that requires the
> maintainer's attention, it should be easier for users and for
Yes, don't get hung up on a name. That button could just as easily
have said: "Needs attention" and then it would cover all the bases.
More information about the aur-general