[aur-general] AUR 3.3.0 released
johannes at kyriasis.com
Wed Jul 9 09:29:30 EDT 2014
On 09/07, Jesse McClure wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:44:56PM +0200, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
>> On 09/07, Nowaker wrote:
>> > ... I don't think differentiating between out-of-date, broken or
>> > whatever is useful for anything.
>> The problem is that sometimes a package is out-of-date but can't be updated
>> for various reasons.
>I don't see the relevance to the point this seemed to be a response to.
>That package may be hard/impossible to maintain, true - but separate
>flags for 'out of date', 'broken', 'wont compile' wouldn't aid that
>situation any. In fact they might make it worse.
I was responding to auto-orphaning of all packages, even the ones that
aren't out-of-date due to maintainer negligence, not specifically about
having just one flag.
PGP Key ID: 3A9D0BB5
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 1530 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the aur-general