[aur-general] AUR 3.3.0 released

[Johannes Löthberg]

On 09/07, Jesse McClure wrote:
>
>On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:44:56PM +0200, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
>> On 09/07, Nowaker wrote:
>> > ... I don't think differentiating between out-of-date, broken or
>> > whatever is useful for anything.
>>
>> The problem is that sometimes a package is out-of-date but can't be updated
>> for various reasons.
>
>I don't see the relevance to the point this seemed to be a response to.
>That package may be hard/impossible to maintain, true - but separate
>flags for 'out of date', 'broken', 'wont compile' wouldn't aid that
>situation any.  In fact they might make it worse.
>

I was responding to auto-orphaning of all packages, even the ones that 
aren't out-of-date due to maintainer negligence, not specifically about 
having just one flag.

-- 
Sincerely,
  Johannes Löthberg
  PGP Key ID: 3A9D0BB5
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1530 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20140709/aff9a189/attachment-0001.asc>