[aur-general] Move vagrant to [community]?

[Jonathan Steel]

On Fri 21 Feb 2014 at 19:34, Jonathan Steel wrote:
> On Fri 21 Feb 2014 at 12:51, Ido Rosen wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I maintain vagrant package in AUR.  I believe vagrant is a very useful tool
> > for ArchLinux users.  I am happy to continue maintaining it in AUR;
> > however, for the good of the community, it would be great if one of you TUs
> > could move vagrant into [community] as soon as possible so it could get
> > wider exposure.  It currently has ~147 votes.  Releases are infrequent, so
> > it has been very easy to maintain overall.
> > 
> > AUR package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vagrant/
> > Upstream distribution website: http://www.vagrantup.com/
> > [...]
> 
> I use this a bit and was considering moving it to community when I had a
> bit more time. If no one steps up in the next week or so then I'll start
> looking at moving it/the best way to package it.

Vagrant has been updated in the AUR using my proposed installation method
(not using the rpm file). This means needing 22 ruby-* packages.

Please share comments/suggestions/concerns either here or in the comments:

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vagrant/

I plan to move it to [community] along with dependencies by the end of the
week, unless concerns/issues arise.

Thanks,

-- 
Jonathan Steel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20140311/8ed094aa/attachment.asc>