[aur-general] Package orphaning policy improvement - RFC
dutchman55 at gmx.com
Sun May 25 12:20:46 EDT 2014
On Sun, 25 May 2014 17:06:21 +0200
Nowaker <enwukaer at gmail.com> wrote:
> Currently one has to contact the maintainer and wait 2 weeks before
> reaching a TU on the ML to take over the package. I think this is
> totally OK when the maintainer really maintains the package, e.g. has
> generally frequent updates, responds to the comments, etc.
> However, this is an overhead when it's obvious a package is no longer
> maintained. For example, those marked out-of-date for more than 3
> months, or those that have numbers of comments requesting update with
> no single response from the maintainer.
> It includes a situation when a maintainer is otherwise active on AUR,
> e.g. they update their other packages. The fact is they don't upgrade
> the very one package that people are interested in - otherwise a
> package wouldn't have been marked out-of-date in the first place.
> What do you think about auto-orhpaning packages that stay marked
> out-of-date for more than, say, 3 months? Done automatically by AUR,
> with no request on ML.
I totally agree with you.
I have been, and still are, busy updating older Brother print/scan
It would save a lot of time and effort if this would be implemented.
Besides if the maintainer of such packages is really serious he should
More information about the aur-general