[aur-general] Package orphaning policy improvement - RFC
ebrodeur at ujami.net
Mon May 26 02:19:48 EDT 2014
+1 to auto-mail + auto-orphan, I bet more packages will get picked up
instead of sitting in limbo until somebody wants to deal with the process
of getting a package orphaned.
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Thiago Barroso Perrotta <
thiagoperrotta95 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 25 May 2014 17:06:21 +0200
> Nowaker <enwukaer at gmail.com> wrote:
> > What do you think about auto-orhpaning packages that stay marked
> > out-of-date for more than, say, 3 months? Done automatically by AUR,
> > with no request on ML.
> +1 for that.
> Of course, it would be nice to also auto-mail the maintainer, say, one
> week before the auto-orphaning.
More information about the aur-general