[aur-general] Java name guideliness

[Det]

On Fri Sep 19 00:02:27 EDT 2014, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote:
 > but upstream name not necesary mean the name that the encapsulate that
 > contain the package need to be named.
 >
 > There ar a handfull either throw arch and aur history and actual named
 > packages that not follow the name.
 >
 > but too looking to the other packages in aur the version is alwas 
separate
 > from the name of the package so in the end <namepackage>-<version> 
will be
 > used.
 > Upstream not give a version or give a "-" or a plain space for 
versions if
 > ou are going to follow uptream.

I'm sorry, but I didn't understand any of this.

Also, please don't top-post, as already stated.

                     Det