[aur-general] AUR Best Practice for New Package Upload

Ivan Shapovalov intelfx100 at gmail.com
Wed Sep 24 11:19:54 UTC 2014

On Wednesday 24 September 2014 at 19:22:50, David Phillips wrote:	
> >A repository for "any" doesn't make sense.
> It would mean that there's not the potential for duplication between
> the various architectures' repos. I *am* assuming they'd use symlinks
> for the 'any' packages on the mirrors?

At least on mirror.yandex.ru this is true and even more so. They have
a common "pool" directory with all packages from all repositories
and then the $repo/os/$arch/* files are just symlinks to respective
files in the pool.

Ivan Shapovalov / intelfx /
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 213 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20140924/0d303149/attachment.asc>

More information about the aur-general mailing list